• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用脑电图和眼动数据以及机器学习开发FLS和RAS手术任务中的性能和学习率预测模型。

Performance and learning rate prediction models development in FLS and RAS surgical tasks using electroencephalogram and eye gaze data and machine learning.

作者信息

Shafiei Somayeh B, Shadpour Saeed, Intes Xavier, Rahul Rahul, Toussi Mehdi Seilanian, Shafqat Ambreen

机构信息

Intelligent Cancer Care Laboratory, Department of Urology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA.

University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2023 Nov;37(11):8447-8463. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10409-y. Epub 2023 Sep 20.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-023-10409-y
PMID:37730852
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10615961/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study explored the use of electroencephalogram (EEG) and eye gaze features, experience-related features, and machine learning to evaluate performance and learning rates in fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) and robotic-assisted surgery (RAS).

METHODS

EEG and eye-tracking data were collected from 25 participants performing three FLS and 22 participants performing two RAS tasks. Generalized linear mixed models, using L1-penalized estimation, were developed to objectify performance evaluation using EEG and eye gaze features, and linear models were developed to objectify learning rate evaluation using these features and performance scores at the first attempt. Experience metrics were added to evaluate their role in learning robotic surgery. The differences in performance across experience levels were tested using analysis of variance.

RESULTS

EEG and eye gaze features and experience-related features were important for evaluating performance in FLS and RAS tasks with reasonable results. Residents outperformed faculty in FLS peg transfer (p value = 0.04), while faculty and residents both excelled over pre-medical students in the FLS pattern cut (p value = 0.01 and p value < 0.001, respectively). Fellows outperformed pre-medical students in FLS suturing (p value = 0.01). In RAS tasks, both faculty and fellows surpassed pre-medical students (p values for the RAS pattern cut were 0.001 for faculty and 0.003 for fellows, while for RAS tissue dissection, the p value was less than 0.001 for both groups), with residents also showing superior skills in tissue dissection (p value  = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Findings could be used to develop training interventions for improving surgical skills and have implications for understanding motor learning and designing interventions to enhance learning outcomes.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨了利用脑电图(EEG)和眼动注视特征、经验相关特征以及机器学习来评估腹腔镜手术基础(FLS)和机器人辅助手术(RAS)中的操作表现和学习率。

方法

收集了25名进行三项FLS操作的参与者以及22名进行两项RAS任务的参与者的EEG和眼动追踪数据。使用L1惩罚估计的广义线性混合模型,通过EEG和眼动注视特征来客观化操作表现评估,并建立线性模型,利用这些特征和首次尝试时的操作表现得分来客观化学习率评估。加入经验指标以评估其在机器人手术学习中的作用。使用方差分析来检验不同经验水平下操作表现的差异。

结果

EEG和眼动注视特征以及经验相关特征对于评估FLS和RAS任务中的操作表现很重要,结果合理。在FLS套管针转移操作中,住院医师的表现优于教员(p值 = 0.04),而在FLS图案切割操作中,教员和住院医师均优于医学预科学生(p值分别为0.01和p值 < 0.001)。在FLS缝合操作中,研究员的表现优于医学预科学生(p值 = 0.01)。在RAS任务中,教员和研究员均超过医学预科学生(RAS图案切割操作中,教员的p值为0.001,研究员的p值为0.003,而在RAS组织解剖操作中,两组的p值均小于0.001),住院医师在组织解剖方面也表现出卓越技能(p值 = 0.03)。

结论

研究结果可用于制定提高手术技能的培训干预措施,并对理解运动学习以及设计增强学习效果的干预措施具有启示意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eac4/10615961/4c42278365ee/464_2023_10409_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eac4/10615961/4c42278365ee/464_2023_10409_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eac4/10615961/4c42278365ee/464_2023_10409_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Performance and learning rate prediction models development in FLS and RAS surgical tasks using electroencephalogram and eye gaze data and machine learning.使用脑电图和眼动数据以及机器学习开发FLS和RAS手术任务中的性能和学习率预测模型。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Nov;37(11):8447-8463. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10409-y. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
2
Surgical skill level classification model development using EEG and eye-gaze data and machine learning algorithms.基于 EEG 和眼动数据及机器学习算法的外科手术技能水平分类模型的建立。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Dec;17(6):2963-2971. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01722-8. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
3
Convergent validation and transfer of learning studies of a virtual reality-based pattern cutting simulator.基于虚拟现实的裁剪模拟样片的融合验证和学习迁移研究。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1265-1272. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5802-8. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
4
Robotic Assistance Confers Ambidexterity to Laparoscopic Surgeons.机器人辅助赋予腹腔镜医师双手操作能力。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Jan;25(1):76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.010. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
5
An Integrated Electroencephalography and Eye-Tracking Analysis Using eXtreme Gradient Boosting for Mental Workload Evaluation in Surgery.一种结合脑电图和眼动追踪分析的方法,利用极端梯度提升算法评估手术中的精神负荷
Hum Factors. 2025 May;67(5):464-484. doi: 10.1177/00187208241285513. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
6
Prediction of Robotic Anastomosis Competency Evaluation (RACE) metrics during vesico-urethral anastomosis using electroencephalography, eye-tracking, and machine learning.使用脑电图、眼动追踪和机器学习预测膀胱-尿道吻合术中的机器人吻合术能力评估 (RACE) 指标。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 25;14(1):14611. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65648-3.
7
FLS tasks can be used as an ergonomic discriminator between laparoscopic and robotic surgery.功能性腹腔镜技能(FLS)任务可作为区分腹腔镜手术和机器人手术人体工程学差异的指标。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Aug;28(8):2459-65. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3497-7. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
8
Value of fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery training in a fourth-year medical school advanced surgical skills elective.腹腔镜手术基础训练在医学院四年级高级外科技能选修课程中的价值。
J Surg Res. 2012 Oct;177(2):207-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.05.015. Epub 2012 May 24.
9
Visuospatial abilities and fine motor experiences influence acquisition and maintenance of fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) task performance.视空间能力和精细运动经验影响腹腔镜手术(FLS)基本技能获得和维持。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4639-4648. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6220-2. Epub 2018 May 18.
10
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS™) versus standard laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of performance using a surgical simulator.单孔腹腔镜手术(SILS™)与标准腹腔镜手术:使用手术模拟器比较手术性能。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Feb;25(2):483-90. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1197-5. Epub 2010 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Multi-perspective analysis of daVinci surgical virtual reality training: a prospective randomized controlled study.达芬奇手术虚拟现实训练的多视角分析:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
J Robot Surg. 2025 May 16;19(1):221. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02309-1.
2
An Integrated Electroencephalography and Eye-Tracking Analysis Using eXtreme Gradient Boosting for Mental Workload Evaluation in Surgery.一种结合脑电图和眼动追踪分析的方法,利用极端梯度提升算法评估手术中的精神负荷
Hum Factors. 2025 May;67(5):464-484. doi: 10.1177/00187208241285513. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
3
Using neuroimaging to assess brain activity and areas associated with surgical skills: a systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing surgical skill level classification model using visual metrics and a gradient boosting algorithm.使用视觉指标和梯度提升算法开发手术技能水平分类模型。
Ann Surg Open. 2023 Jun;4(2). doi: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000292. Epub 2023 May 24.
2
The development of an eye movement-based deep learning system for laparoscopic surgical skills assessment.基于眼动的腹腔镜手术技能评估深度学习系统的开发。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 15;12(1):11036. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15053-5.
3
SCC-MPGCN: self-attention coherence clustering based on multi-pooling graph convolutional network for EEG emotion recognition.
使用神经影像学评估与手术技能相关的大脑活动和区域:系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jun;38(6):3004-3026. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10830-x. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
SCC-MPGCN:基于多池化图卷积网络的自注意力相干聚类的 EEG 情绪识别。
J Neural Eng. 2022 Apr 21;19(2). doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac6294.
4
Changes in attentional resources during the acquisition of laparoscopic surgical skills.注意力资源在腹腔镜手术技能获取过程中的变化。
BJS Open. 2021 Mar 5;5(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa012.
5
The cost of robotics: an analysis of the added costs of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery using the National Inpatient Sample.机器人手术的成本:利用国家住院患者样本分析机器人辅助手术与腹腔镜手术的附加成本。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jul;33(7):2217-2221. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6507-3. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
6
Brain state flexibility accompanies motor-skill acquisition.大脑状态的灵活性伴随着运动技能的获得。
Neuroimage. 2018 May 1;171:135-147. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.093. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
7
Positive affect, surprise, and fatigue are correlates of network flexibility.积极情绪、惊讶和疲劳是网络灵活性的相关因素。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 31;7(1):520. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00425-z.
8
Depth Perception of Surgeons in Minimally Invasive Surgery.微创手术中外科医生的深度感知
Surg Innov. 2016 Oct;23(5):515-24. doi: 10.1177/1553350616639141. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
9
A Functional Cartography of Cognitive Systems.认知系统的功能图谱
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Dec 2;11(12):e1004533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004533. eCollection 2015 Dec.
10
Learning from the other limb's experience: sharing the 'trained' M1 representation of the motor sequence knowledge.从另一肢体的经验中学习:共享运动序列知识的“训练过的”M1表征。
J Physiol. 2016 Jan 1;594(1):169-88. doi: 10.1113/JP270184. Epub 2015 Nov 23.