• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国纽约州北部在新冠疫情期间对野生及自家种植食物的食用情况。

Wild and backyard food use during COVID-19 in upstate New York, United States.

作者信息

Coffin-Schmitt Jeanne L, Clements Nia, Marshall Grace, Liu Lu, Trombitas Aly, Wang Zi, Yuan Shuai, Safi Amelia Greiner, Hanson Karla L, Fiorella Kathryn J

机构信息

Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.

Department of Public and Ecosystem Health, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.

出版信息

Front Nutr. 2023 Sep 5;10:1222610. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1222610. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fnut.2023.1222610
PMID:37731401
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10507697/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

COVID-19 acutely shocked both socio-economic and food systems in 2020. We investigated the impact of COVID-19 on production and consumption of gardened produce, backyard poultry, wild game and fish, and foraged mushrooms, berries, and other plants in New York State, aiming to understand crisis influenced food choice and motivations, including food security.

METHODS

We conducted an online, cross-sectional survey in October-December 2020 with a convenience sample of participants ( = 505) with an interest in gardening, poultry rearing, foraging, hunting, and/or fishing from six counties in upstate New York. We recruited through the New York Department of Environmental Conservation, Cornell Cooperative Extension, and other relevant email and social media pages.

RESULTS

Across the wild and backyard food production strategies, 4.0-14.3% of respondents reported engaging for the first time and 39.6-45.7% reported increased production (a little or a lot more), and 31.6-42.7% of respondents' production was the same as the previous year. Consumption of foods produced was widespread, including fruit and vegetables (97.6% of producers also consumed), backyard eggs (92.7%), and foraged foods (93.8%). For meats, a majority consumed backyard poultry meat (51.2%), wild-caught fish (69.7%), and wild game they hunted (80.1%). The frequency of consumption of fruit and vegetables (average of 13.5 times/month) and eggs (16.4 times/month) was very high, while average consumption of poultry meat, foraged foods, fish, and wild game ranged from 3.1 to 5.8 times/month. The number of respondents who reported "have more control over food availability" as motivation to produce all wild and backyard foods increased from 2019 to 2020 ( < 0.05 - < 0.001). There was also a significant relationship between experiences of COVID-19 related hardship (i.e., food insecurity, income loss) with gardening and poultry-rearing ( ≤ 0.05), but not with other production methods or with consumption of wild and backyard foods.

DISCUSSION

Our findings help to locate wild and backyard foods within COVID-19 impacted food environments, and describe food security as a particularly relevant motivation, among others, reported by respondents in 2020. Given this, New York State service providers can use these findings to tailor current future support for households exerting control over their own food environments with wild and backyard foods, allowing the state to be better prepared for future crises.

摘要

引言

2020年,新冠疫情对社会经济和粮食系统造成了严重冲击。我们调查了新冠疫情对纽约州园圃农产品、后院家禽、野生动物和鱼类以及野生蘑菇、浆果和其他植物的生产和消费的影响,旨在了解危机如何影响食物选择和动机,包括粮食安全。

方法

2020年10月至12月,我们对纽约州北部六个县对园艺、家禽饲养、觅食、狩猎和/或捕鱼感兴趣的参与者(n = 505)进行了一项在线横断面调查,采用便利抽样法。我们通过纽约州环境保护部、康奈尔大学合作推广部以及其他相关电子邮件和社交媒体页面招募参与者。

结果

在野生和后院食物生产策略方面,4.0 - 14.3%的受访者表示首次参与,39.6 - 45.7%的受访者表示产量增加(略有增加或大幅增加),31.6 - 42.7%的受访者产量与上一年相同。所生产食物的消费很普遍,包括水果和蔬菜(97.6%的生产者也消费)、后院鸡蛋(92.7%)和野生食物(93.8%)。对于肉类,大多数人消费后院家禽肉(51.2%)、野生捕捞的鱼(69.7%)以及他们猎杀的野生动物(80.1%)。水果和蔬菜的消费频率(平均每月13.5次)和鸡蛋的消费频率(平均每月16.4次)非常高,而家禽肉(3.1次/月)、野生食物(5.8次/月)、鱼类和野生动物(平均每月3.1至5.8次)的消费频率则较低。报告“对食物供应有更多控制权”是生产所有野生和后院食物动机的受访者数量从2019年到2020年有所增加(P < 0.05 - P < 0.001)。新冠疫情相关困难(即粮食不安全、收入损失)的经历与园艺和家禽饲养之间也存在显著关系(P ≤ 0.05),但与其他生产方式或野生和后院食物的消费无关。

讨论

我们的研究结果有助于在新冠疫情影响的食物环境中定位野生和后院食物,并将粮食安全描述为2020年受访者报告的特别相关的动机之一。鉴于此,纽约州的服务提供者可以利用这些结果,为那些通过野生和后院食物对自己的食物环境施加控制的家庭量身定制当前和未来的支持措施,使该州能够更好地应对未来的危机。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4554/10507697/c935b5bb2b07/fnut-10-1222610-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4554/10507697/c935b5bb2b07/fnut-10-1222610-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4554/10507697/c935b5bb2b07/fnut-10-1222610-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Wild and backyard food use during COVID-19 in upstate New York, United States.美国纽约州北部在新冠疫情期间对野生及自家种植食物的食用情况。
Front Nutr. 2023 Sep 5;10:1222610. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1222610. eCollection 2023.
2
Home food procurement impacts food security and diet quality during COVID-19.家庭食品采购对 COVID-19 期间的食品安全和饮食质量有影响。
BMC Public Health. 2021 May 19;21(1):945. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10960-0.
3
Influx of Backyard Farming with Limited Biosecurity Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic Carries an Increased Risk of Zoonotic Spillover in Cambodia.由于 COVID-19 大流行,后院农业的涌入带来了更高的柬埔寨人畜共患病溢出风险。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Feb 14;11(1):e0420722. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04207-22. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
4
Does plate waste matter?: A two-stage cluster survey to assess the household plate waste in the Philippines.盘子浪费问题严重吗?:菲律宾两阶段聚类调查评估家庭盘子浪费情况。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jan 4;23(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14894-z.
5
The Egg Hub Model: A Sustainable and Replicable Approach to Address Food Security and Improve Livelihoods.鸡蛋中心模式:一种解决粮食安全和改善生计的可持续且可复制的方法。
Curr Dev Nutr. 2024 Jun 13;8(8):103795. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.103795. eCollection 2024 Aug.
6
How did the COVID-19 pandemic affect food environment, food purchase, and fish consumption among low-income urban households in Bangladesh-A path analysis.新冠疫情如何影响孟加拉国城市低收入家庭的食物环境、食物购买和鱼类消费——路径分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 15;10:994236. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.994236. eCollection 2022.
7
8
Backyard poultry raising in Bangladesh: a valued resource for the villagers and a setting for zoonotic transmission of avian influenza. A qualitative study.孟加拉国的后院家禽养殖:村民的宝贵资源及禽流感人畜共患病传播的环境。一项定性研究。
Rural Remote Health. 2012;12:1927. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
9
Using multiple data sources to explore disease transmission risk between commercial poultry, backyard poultry, and wild birds in New Zealand.利用多种数据源探索新西兰商业家禽、后院家禽和野生鸟类之间的疾病传播风险。
Prev Vet Med. 2021 May;190:105327. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105327. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
10
Raising Backyard Poultry in Rural Bangladesh: Financial and Nutritional Benefits, but Persistent Risky Practices.在孟加拉国农村地区饲养后院家禽:经济和营养上的好处,但仍存在风险行为。
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017 Oct;64(5):1454-1464. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12536. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Does Home and Wild Food Procurement Enhance Food Security in High-Income Countries?在高收入国家,家庭和野生食物采购能增强粮食安全吗?
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2025 Aug 26;12(1):32. doi: 10.1007/s40572-025-00495-6.
2
Centering context when characterizing food environments: the potential of participatory mapping to inform food environment research.在描述食物环境时以背景为中心:参与式绘图对食物环境研究提供信息的潜力。
Front Nutr. 2024 Feb 21;11:1324102. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1324102. eCollection 2024.
3
An insight into market and non-market alternative food networks in Czechia during Covid-19 and beyond.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of COVID-19 in food supply chain: Disruptions and recovery strategy.新冠疫情对食品供应链的影响:中断与恢复策略
Curr Res Behav Sci. 2021 Nov;2:100017. doi: 10.1016/j.crbeha.2021.100017. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
2
Building a safety buffer for European food security: the role of small-scale food production and local ecological and gastronomic knowledge in light of COVID-19.为欧洲粮食安全建立安全缓冲:鉴于新冠疫情,小规模粮食生产以及当地生态和美食知识的作用
Open Res Eur. 2021 Oct 21;1:10. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.13138.2. eCollection 2021.
3
COVID-19 restrictions and recreational fisheries in Ontario, Canada: Preliminary insights from an online angler survey.
对新冠疫情期间及之后捷克共和国的市场和非市场替代食品网络的洞察。
Front Nutr. 2024 Feb 6;11:1327308. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1327308. eCollection 2024.
加拿大安大略省的新冠疫情限制措施与休闲渔业:一项在线垂钓者调查的初步见解
Fish Res. 2021 Aug;240:105961. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2021.105961. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
4
Physically apart but socially connected: Lessons in social resilience from community gardening during the COVID-19 pandemic.身体上保持距离,但社会上紧密相连:新冠疫情期间社区园艺带来的社会复原力经验教训。
Landsc Urban Plan. 2022 Jul;223:104418. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104418. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
5
Home garden use during COVID-19: Associations with physical and mental wellbeing in older adults.新冠疫情期间家庭园艺活动:与老年人身心健康的关联
J Environ Psychol. 2021 Feb;73:101545. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101545. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
6
Small-scale fishing households facing COVID-19: The case of Lake Victoria, Kenya.面临新冠疫情的小规模渔业家庭:以肯尼亚维多利亚湖为例。
Fish Res. 2021 May;237:105856. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2020.105856. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
7
Digital food sharing and food insecurity in the COVID-19 era.新冠疫情时代的数字食品共享与粮食不安全问题
Resour Conserv Recycl. 2023 Feb;189:106735. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106735. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
8
Perceived COVID-19-related stress drives home gardening intentions and improves human health in Taiwan.在台湾,感知到的与新冠疫情相关的压力促使人们产生家庭园艺的意愿,并改善人类健康。
Urban For Urban Green. 2022 Dec;78:127770. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127770. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
9
frequency in backyard chickens in Vermont and biosecurity knowledge and practices of owners.佛蒙特州后院养鸡的频率以及鸡主人的生物安全知识与做法。
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Sep 22;9:979548. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.979548. eCollection 2022.
10
Experiences of gardening during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.园艺体验在 COVID-19 大流行初期。
Health Place. 2022 Jul;76:102854. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102854. Epub 2022 Jun 30.