Lachance Andrew D, Call Catherine, Radford Zachary, Stoddard Henry, Sturgeon Callahan, Babikian George, Rana Adam, McGrory Brian J
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Guthrie Clinic, Sayre, PA, USA.
Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Arthroplast Today. 2023 Sep 14;23:101190. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101190. eCollection 2023 Oct.
Rural patients have unique health-care factors influencing outcomes of arthroplasty, hypothetically putting these patients at increased risk for complications following total joint arthroplasty. The aim of this study is to better understand differences in patient outcomes and satisfaction between rural and urban patients receiving care in an urban setting and to provide more equitable care.
A retrospective chart review was performed on patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty at a single large academic center between January 2013 and August 2020. Demographic, operative, and hospital outcomes were obtained from the institutional electronic medical record. Rurality was determined by rural-urban code (RUC) classifications by zip code with RUC codes 1-3 defined as urban and RUC 4-10 defined as rural.
Patients from urban areas were more likely to visit the emergency department within 30 days postoperatively ( = .006) and be readmitted within 90 days ( < .001). However, unplanned ( < .001) admissions were higher in the rural group. There was no statistical difference in postoperative complications ( = .4). At 6 months, rural patients had higher patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score total ( = .05), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score interval ( = .05), self-reported functional improvement ( < .05), improvements in pain ( < .05), and that the surgery met expectations ( < .05). However, these values did not reach minimal clinically important difference.
There may be differences in emergency department visits, readmissions, and PROMs in rural vs urban populations undergoing total hip arthroplasty in an urban setting. Patient access to care and attitudes of rural patients toward health care may underlie these findings. Understanding differences in PROMs, satisfaction, and hospital-based outcomes based on rurality is essential to provide equitable arthroplasty care.
农村患者具有影响关节置换术结局的独特医疗因素,据推测,这些患者在全关节置换术后发生并发症的风险会增加。本研究的目的是更好地了解在城市环境中接受治疗的农村和城市患者在患者结局和满意度方面的差异,并提供更公平的医疗服务。
对2013年1月至2020年8月期间在一个大型学术中心接受初次全髋关节置换术的患者进行回顾性病历审查。从机构电子病历中获取人口统计学、手术和医院结局数据。根据邮政编码的城乡代码(RUC)分类确定农村地区,RUC代码1-3定义为城市,RUC 4-10定义为农村。
城市地区的患者术后30天内更有可能前往急诊科就诊(P = 0.006),并且在90天内再次入院(P < 0.001)。然而,农村组的非计划入院率更高(P < 0.001)。术后并发症方面无统计学差异(P = 0.4)。在6个月时,农村患者的患者报告结局指标(PROMs)更高,包括髋关节残疾和骨关节炎结局评分总分(P = 0.05)、髋关节残疾和骨关节炎结局评分区间(P = 0.05)、自我报告的功能改善(P < 0.05)、疼痛改善(P < 0.05)以及手术达到预期(P < 0.05)。然而,这些值未达到最小临床重要差异。
在城市环境中接受全髋关节置换术的农村和城市人群在急诊科就诊、再入院和PROMs方面可能存在差异。患者获得医疗服务的机会以及农村患者对医疗保健的态度可能是这些发现的基础。了解基于农村地区的PROMs、满意度和医院结局差异对于提供公平的关节置换术护理至关重要。