Moreira José, João Ana, Aguiar Pedro, Raimundo Armando, Mesquita Marina, Flamínio José, Almeida Manuel, Boto Paulo
Escola Superior de Enfermagem São João de Deus, University of Évora, Évora, Portugal.
Comprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC), University of Évora, Évora, Portugal.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Dec 19;25(1):1027. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-08143-0.
Injury to the knee joint is associated with physical disability, stiffness, pain, restriction of movement and impairment of the person's quality of life, with a few treatment options, including surgery and rehabilitation. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a rehabilitation program on the quality of life reported by patients living in rural and urban areas after knee surgery, using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).
This quasi-experimental study with two groups of participants undergoing primary knee surgery was carried out in two rehabilitation centers, one in an urban area and another in a rural one. The same intervention was structured, with assessments at the start of the study (t0) and after a 4-week program (t1), and a comparison was made between the gains in rural and urban areas. We used descriptive and inferential analysis to analyze the effect of the intervention on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using a linear regression model.
Participants (n = 62 aged between 19 and 84 years (40% of the sample aged over 65years) and 61.9% female, showed improvements in their EQ-5D-5L and HADS scores after the rehabilitation program. Considering the dimensions of HRQoL in both groups, there was a significant improvement in all the components in the rural context (p < 0.005), and improvements in the Mobility (t = 3.48; p = 0.002) and EQ_VAS (t = - 3.77; p = 0.001) components in the urban context. The effect of the program on health gains considering the Mobility was significantly greater in the rural group (- 0.97) compared to the urban group (- 0.13), as well as in the Pain/Disability (- 0.73) vs. (- 0.13) respectively. After analyzing the confounding factors, the rehabilitation center variable indicated gains of the EQ-5D-5L dimensions in a rural context (β= -0.390; t = - 3.041; p = 0.004), with an average reduction in health problems.
There is evidence that the application of PROMs in rehabilitation programs after knee surgery is fundamental, considering the improvements in HRQoL and the optimization of anxiety/depression states in different contexts. PROMs should be applied systematically in clinical practice throughout the rehabilitation process, objectively measuring the results perceived by patients, and according to each context achieving health gains.
registry-ClinicTrials; trial registration number-NCT06206018; data of registration-16/01/2024.
膝关节损伤会导致身体残疾、僵硬、疼痛、活动受限以及生活质量受损,治疗选择有限,包括手术和康复治疗。本研究旨在使用患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs)评估康复计划对膝关节手术后生活在农村和城市地区患者报告的生活质量的影响。
这项准实验研究在两个康复中心进行,两组参与者均接受初次膝关节手术,一个在城市地区,另一个在农村地区。采用相同的干预措施,在研究开始时(t0)和为期4周的计划结束后(t1)进行评估,并对农村和城市地区的改善情况进行比较。我们使用描述性和推断性分析,通过线性回归模型分析干预对健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的影响。
参与者(n = 62,年龄在19至84岁之间,样本中40%年龄超过65岁,女性占61.9%)在康复计划后EQ - 5D - 5L和HADS评分有所改善。考虑到两组的HRQoL维度,农村地区所有组成部分均有显著改善(p < 0.005),城市地区在活动能力(t = 3.48;p = 0.002)和EQ - VAS(t = - 3.77;p = 0.001)组成部分有所改善。该计划对农村组(- 0.97)的活动能力健康改善效果显著大于城市组(- 0.13),疼痛/残疾方面分别为(- 0.73)对(- 0.13)。在分析混杂因素后,康复中心变量表明农村地区EQ - 5D - 5L维度有所改善(β = - 0.390;t = - 3.041;p = 0.004),健康问题平均减少。
有证据表明,考虑到不同背景下HRQoL的改善以及焦虑/抑郁状态的优化,在膝关节手术后的康复计划中应用PROMs至关重要。PROMs应在整个康复过程的临床实践中系统应用,客观测量患者感知的结果,并根据不同背景实现健康改善。
注册机构 - ClinicalTrials;试验注册号 - NCT06206018;注册日期 - 2024年1月16日。