• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

礼貌性疏忽——论关系隔离的根源

Civil inattention-On the sources of relational segregation.

作者信息

Arminen Ilkka A T, Heino Anna S M

机构信息

Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Front Sociol. 2023 Sep 5;8:1212090. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1212090. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2023.1212090
PMID:37731909
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10508291/
Abstract

The article employs ethnomethodological conversation analysis (CA) and experimental video analysis to scrutinize the gaze behavior of urban passersby. We operationalize Goffman's concept of civil inattention to make it an empirical research object with defined boundaries. Video analysis enabled measurement of gaze lengths to establish measures for "normal" gazes within civil inattention and to account for their breaches. We also studied the dependence of gazing behavior on the recipient's social appearance by comparing the unmarked condition, the experimenter wearing casual, indistinctive clothes, to marked conditions, the experimenter wearing either a distinct sunhat or an abaya and niqab. The breaches of civil inattention toward marked gaze recipients were 10-fold compared to unmarked recipients. Furthermore, the analysis points out the commonality of hitherto unknown micro gazes and multiple gazes. Together the findings suggest the existence of subconscious monitoring beneath the public social order, which pre-structures interaction order, and indicates that stigmatization is a source for relational segregation.

摘要

本文采用民族方法学对话分析(CA)和实验视频分析来审视城市路人的注视行为。我们将戈夫曼的“礼貌性忽视”概念进行操作化处理,使其成为一个有明确界定的实证研究对象。视频分析能够测量注视时长,以确定“礼貌性忽视”范围内“正常”注视的标准,并对其被打破的情况进行记录。我们还通过比较无明显特征的条件(实验者穿着随意、无明显特征的衣服)和有明显特征的条件(实验者戴着醒目的太阳帽或穿着阿巴亚长袍和尼卡布),研究了注视行为对接受者社会外表的依赖性。与无明显特征的接受者相比,对有明显特征的注视对象的礼貌性忽视被打破的情况高出10倍。此外,分析还指出了迄今未知的微观注视和多重注视的普遍性。这些发现共同表明,在公共社会秩序之下存在潜意识监控,它预先构建了互动秩序,并表明污名化是关系隔离的一个根源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b606/10508291/befd9abe2a8a/fsoc-08-1212090-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b606/10508291/befd9abe2a8a/fsoc-08-1212090-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b606/10508291/befd9abe2a8a/fsoc-08-1212090-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Civil inattention-On the sources of relational segregation.礼貌性疏忽——论关系隔离的根源
Front Sociol. 2023 Sep 5;8:1212090. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1212090. eCollection 2023.
2
Moral landscapes and morally meaningful encounters: how interaction ritual connects conversation analysis and cultural sociology.道德景观与具有道德意义的相遇:互动仪式如何连接会话分析与文化社会学。
Front Sociol. 2024 Apr 25;9:1251164. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1251164. eCollection 2024.
3
The ethics of inattention: revitalising civil inattention as a privacy-protecting mechanism in public spaces.疏忽的伦理:重振文明疏忽作为公共场所隐私保护机制
Ethics Inf Technol. 2021;23(3):331-343. doi: 10.1007/s10676-020-09575-7. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
4
Social motivation predicts gaze following between 6 and 14 months.社会动机预测 6 至 14 个月的目光跟随。
Infancy. 2023 Jul-Aug;28(4):836-860. doi: 10.1111/infa.12544. Epub 2023 May 17.
5
ERP evidence on how gaze convergence affects social attention.眼动融合证据对社会注意力的影响。
Sci Rep. 2019 May 20;9(1):7586. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44058-w.
6
Timing of gazes in child dialogues: a time-course analysis of requests and back channelling in referential communication.儿童对话中的注视时间:参照交流中请求和反馈的时间进程分析。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2012 Jul-Aug;47(4):373-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-6984.2012.00151.x. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
7
Context-sensitivity and context-productivity: notions of "practice" and "practicality" in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis.情境敏感性与情境生成性:常人方法论与会话分析中的“实践”和“实用性”概念
Front Sociol. 2024 Jul 24;9:1221026. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1221026. eCollection 2024.
8
Influences of eye gaze cues on memory and its mechanisms: The function and evolution of social attention.目光注视线索对记忆的影响及其机制:社会注意力的功能与进化
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 14;13:1036530. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1036530. eCollection 2022.
9
Does social presence or the potential for interaction reduce social gaze in online social scenarios? Introducing the "live lab" paradigm.在在线社交场景中,社交临场感或互动可能性会减少社交凝视吗?引入“现场实验室”范式。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Apr;72(4):779-791. doi: 10.1177/1747021818772812. Epub 2018 May 11.
10
The neural basis of intergroup threat effect on social attention.群体间威胁效应对社会注意力的神经基础。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 25;7:41062. doi: 10.1038/srep41062.

引用本文的文献

1
Moral landscapes and morally meaningful encounters: how interaction ritual connects conversation analysis and cultural sociology.道德景观与具有道德意义的相遇:互动仪式如何连接会话分析与文化社会学。
Front Sociol. 2024 Apr 25;9:1251164. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1251164. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Multimodal Language Processing in Human Communication.人类交流中的多模态语言处理。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Aug;23(8):639-652. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
2
The dual function of social gaze.社会凝视的双重功能。
Cognition. 2015 Mar;136:359-64. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.040. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
3
Early binding of gaze, gesture, and emotion: neural time course and correlates.早期的目光、手势和情感绑定:神经时程和相关物。
J Neurosci. 2012 Mar 28;32(13):4531-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5636-11.2012.
4
panhandling repertoires and routines for overcoming the nonperson treatment.行乞的全部技能及克服被不当对待的惯常做法。
Deviant Behav. 1999;20(2):183-206. doi: 10.1080/016396299266551.
5
First impressions: making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face.第一印象:在对一张脸暴露100毫秒后做出决定。
Psychol Sci. 2006 Jul;17(7):592-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01750.x.
6
The look of love: gaze shifts and person perception.爱的眼神:目光转移与人物感知。
Psychol Sci. 2005 Mar;16(3):236-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00809.x.
7
Visual recognition: as soon as you know it is there, you know what it is.视觉识别:一旦你知道它在那里,你就知道它是什么。
Psychol Sci. 2005 Feb;16(2):152-60. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00796.x.
8
Speed of processing in the human visual system.人类视觉系统中的信息处理速度。
Nature. 1996 Jun 6;381(6582):520-2. doi: 10.1038/381520a0.