• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于微信公众号反谣言文章的健康谣言热点话题识别:主题建模。

Hot Topic Recognition of Health Rumors Based on Anti-Rumor Articles on the WeChat Official Account Platform: Topic Modeling.

机构信息

Chongqing Medical University, College of Medical Informatics, Chongqing, China.

Department of Quality Management, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University (The Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 21;25:e45019. doi: 10.2196/45019.

DOI:10.2196/45019
PMID:37733396
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10557010/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Social networks have become one of the main channels for obtaining health information. However, they have also become a source of health-related misinformation, which seriously threatens the public's physical and mental health. Governance of health-related misinformation can be implemented through topic identification of rumors on social networks. However, little attention has been paid to studying the types and routes of dissemination of health rumors on the internet, especially rumors regarding health-related information in Chinese social media.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore the types of health-related misinformation favored by WeChat public platform users and their prevalence trends and to analyze the modeling results of the text by using the Latent Dirichlet Allocation model.

METHODS

We used a web crawler tool to capture health rumor-dispelling articles on WeChat rumor-dispelling public accounts. We collected information from health-debunking articles posted between January 1, 2016, and August 31, 2022. Following word segmentation of the collected text, a document topic generation model called Latent Dirichlet Allocation was used to identify and generalize the most common topics. The proportion distribution of the themes was calculated, and the negative impact of various health rumors in different periods was analyzed. Additionally, the prevalence of health rumors was analyzed by the number of health rumors generated at each time point.

RESULTS

We collected 9366 rumor-refuting articles from January 1, 2016, to August 31, 2022, from WeChat official accounts. Through topic modeling, we divided the health rumors into 8 topics, that is, rumors on prevention and treatment of infectious diseases (1284/9366, 13.71%), disease therapy and its effects (1037/9366, 11.07%), food safety (1243/9366, 13.27%), cancer and its causes (946/9366, 10.10%), regimen and disease (1540/9366, 16.44%), transmission (914/9366, 9.76%), healthy diet (1068/9366, 11.40%), and nutrition and health (1334/9366, 14.24%). Furthermore, we summarized the 8 topics under 4 themes, that is, public health, disease, diet and health, and spread of rumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that topic modeling can provide analysis and insights into health rumor governance. The rumor development trends showed that most rumors were on public health, disease, and diet and health problems. Governments still need to implement relevant and comprehensive rumor management strategies based on the rumors prevalent in their countries and formulate appropriate policies. Apart from regulating the content disseminated on social media platforms, the national quality of health education should also be improved. Governance of social networks should be clearly implemented, as these rapidly developed platforms come with privacy issues. Both disseminators and receivers of information should ensure a realistic attitude and disseminate health information correctly. In addition, we recommend that sentiment analysis-related studies be conducted to verify the impact of health rumor-related topics.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/928a/10557010/bd99e57fe3df/jmir_v25i1e45019_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/928a/10557010/d72ba4376a89/jmir_v25i1e45019_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/928a/10557010/8f8744775f45/jmir_v25i1e45019_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/928a/10557010/87c252105bf5/jmir_v25i1e45019_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/928a/10557010/bd99e57fe3df/jmir_v25i1e45019_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/928a/10557010/d72ba4376a89/jmir_v25i1e45019_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/928a/10557010/8f8744775f45/jmir_v25i1e45019_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/928a/10557010/87c252105bf5/jmir_v25i1e45019_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/928a/10557010/bd99e57fe3df/jmir_v25i1e45019_fig4.jpg
摘要

背景

社交网络已成为获取健康信息的主要渠道之一。然而,它们也成为了健康相关错误信息的来源,严重威胁着公众的身心健康。可以通过对社交网络上的谣言进行主题识别来对健康相关错误信息进行治理。然而,对于互联网上健康谣言的传播类型和途径,特别是中国社交媒体中与健康相关信息的谣言,关注甚少。

目的

本研究旨在探讨微信公众平台用户偏好的健康相关错误信息类型及其流行趋势,并通过潜在狄利克雷分配模型(Latent Dirichlet Allocation,LDA)分析文本的建模结果。

方法

我们使用网络爬虫工具捕获微信辟谣公众号上的健康谣言辟谣文章。我们收集了 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 8 月 31 日期间发布的健康辟谣文章的信息。在对收集的文本进行分词后,使用名为潜在狄利克雷分配的文档主题生成模型来识别和概括最常见的主题。计算了主题的比例分布,并分析了不同时期各种健康谣言的负面影响。此外,还通过每个时间点生成的健康谣言数量来分析健康谣言的流行程度。

结果

我们从 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 8 月 31 日期间从微信官方账号收集了 9366 篇辟谣文章。通过主题建模,我们将健康谣言分为 8 个主题,即传染病防治谣言(1284/9366,13.71%)、疾病治疗及其效果谣言(1037/9366,11.07%)、食品安全谣言(1243/9366,13.27%)、癌症及其成因谣言(946/9366,10.10%)、方案和疾病谣言(1540/9366,16.44%)、传播谣言(914/9366,9.76%)、健康饮食谣言(1068/9366,11.40%)和营养与健康谣言(1334/9366,14.24%)。此外,我们总结了 4 个主题下的 8 个主题,即公共卫生、疾病、饮食与健康和谣言传播。

结论

我们的研究表明,主题建模可以为健康谣言治理提供分析和见解。谣言的发展趋势表明,大多数谣言都集中在公共卫生、疾病和饮食与健康问题上。政府仍需要根据本国流行的谣言,实施相关和全面的谣言管理策略,并制定适当的政策。除了规范社交媒体平台上的内容传播外,还应提高国家健康教育质量。应明确实施网络治理,因为这些快速发展的平台存在隐私问题。信息的传播者和接收者都应保持现实态度,正确传播健康信息。此外,我们建议进行与情感分析相关的研究,以验证健康谣言相关主题的影响。

相似文献

1
Hot Topic Recognition of Health Rumors Based on Anti-Rumor Articles on the WeChat Official Account Platform: Topic Modeling.基于微信公众号反谣言文章的健康谣言热点话题识别:主题建模。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 21;25:e45019. doi: 10.2196/45019.
2
Dissemination and Refutation of Rumors During the COVID-19 Outbreak in China: Infodemiology Study.新冠疫情期间中国谣言的传播与驳斥:信息流行病学研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 15;23(2):e22427. doi: 10.2196/22427.
3
Difference in Rumor Dissemination and Debunking Before and After the Relaxation of COVID-19 Prevention and Control Measures in China: Infodemiology Study.中国放松新冠疫情防控措施前后的谣言传播和辟谣差异:信息流行病学研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 15;26:e48564. doi: 10.2196/48564.
4
Improving the Communication and Credibility of Government Media in Response to Public Health Emergencies: Analysis of Tweets From the WeChat Official Accounts of 10 Chinese Health Commissioners.提高政府媒体应对突发公共卫生事件的沟通和公信力:对 10 位中国卫生局长微信公众号推文的分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 22;10:900776. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.900776. eCollection 2022.
5
COVID-19-Related Rumor Content, Transmission, and Clarification Strategies in China: Descriptive Study.中国与新冠疫情相关的谣言内容、传播及澄清策略:描述性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 23;23(12):e27339. doi: 10.2196/27339.
6
New Insights Into the Social Rumor Characteristics During the COVID-19 Pandemic in China.中国新冠疫情期间社会谣言特征的新洞察
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 27;10:864955. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.864955. eCollection 2022.
7
Concerns Expressed by Chinese Social Media Users During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Content Analysis of Sina Weibo Microblogging Data.新冠疫情期间中国社交媒体用户表达的担忧:对新浪微博数据的内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 26;22(11):e22152. doi: 10.2196/22152.
8
Evaluating Rumor Debunking Effectiveness During the COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis: Utilizing User Stance in Comments on Sina Weibo.评估新冠疫情期间谣言破解的有效性:利用新浪微博评论中的用户立场。
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 30;9:770111. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.770111. eCollection 2021.
9
Medical and Health-Related Misinformation on Social Media: Bibliometric Study of the Scientific Literature.社交媒体上的医疗健康相关错误信息:科学文献的文献计量研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 25;24(1):e28152. doi: 10.2196/28152.
10
Health-Related Rumor Control through Social Collaboration Models: Lessons from Cases in China during the COVID-19 Pandemic.通过社会协作模式进行健康相关谣言管控:新冠疫情期间中国案例的经验教训
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Aug 5;10(8):1475. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10081475.

引用本文的文献

1
Harnessing Social Media Data to Understand Information Needs About Kidney Diseases and Emotional Experiences With Disease Management: Topic and Sentiment Analysis.利用社交媒体数据了解肾脏疾病的信息需求及疾病管理中的情感体验:主题与情感分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 25;27:e64838. doi: 10.2196/64838.
2
Comparing the Accuracy of Two Generated Large Language Models in Identifying Health-Related Rumors or Misconceptions and the Applicability in Health Science Popularization: Proof-of-Concept Study.比较两个生成式大语言模型在识别健康相关谣言或误解方面的准确性及其在健康科学普及中的适用性:概念验证研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Dec 2;8:e63188. doi: 10.2196/63188.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Public health agencies outreach through Instagram during the COVID-19 pandemic: Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication perspective.公共卫生机构在新冠疫情期间通过照片墙进行宣传:危机与应急风险沟通视角
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2021 Jul;61:102346. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102346. Epub 2021 May 27.
2
When do people believe, check, and share health rumors on social media? Effects of evidence type, health literacy, and health knowledge.人们何时在社交媒体上相信、查看和分享健康谣言?证据类型、健康素养和健康知识的影响。
J Health Psychol. 2023 Jun;28(7):607-619. doi: 10.1177/13591053221125992. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
3
Assessing the Role of Social Bots During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Infodemic, Disagreement, and Criticism.
Cancer misinformation on social media.
社交媒体上的癌症错误信息。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 Sep-Oct;74(5):453-464. doi: 10.3322/caac.21857. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
4
Survival analysis of the duration of rumors during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间谣言持续时间的生存分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 19;24(1):519. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17991-3.
评估新冠疫情期间社交机器人的作用:信息疫情、分歧和批评。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 25;24(8):e36085. doi: 10.2196/36085.
4
The effect of information literacy heterogeneity on epidemic spreading in information and epidemic coupled multiplex networks.信息素养异质性对信息与疫情耦合多重网络中疫情传播的影响。
Physica A. 2022 Jun 15;596:127119. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2022.127119. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
5
Dirichlet process mixture models for single-cell RNA-seq clustering.Dirichlet 过程混合模型在单细胞 RNA-seq 聚类中的应用。
Biol Open. 2022 Apr 15;11(4). doi: 10.1242/bio.059001. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
6
Internet Rumors During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Dynamics of Topics and Public Psychologies.新冠疫情期间的网络谣言:话题动态与公众心理。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 20;9:788848. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.788848. eCollection 2021.
7
COVID-19-Related Rumor Content, Transmission, and Clarification Strategies in China: Descriptive Study.中国与新冠疫情相关的谣言内容、传播及澄清策略:描述性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 23;23(12):e27339. doi: 10.2196/27339.
8
Systematic evaluation of COVID-19 related Internet health rumors during the breaking out period of COVID-19 in China.中国新冠疫情爆发期间与新冠病毒相关网络健康谣言的系统评估
Health Promot Perspect. 2021 Aug 18;11(3):288-298. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2021.37. eCollection 2021.
9
PAN-LDA: A latent Dirichlet allocation based novel feature extraction model for COVID-19 data using machine learning.PAN-LDA:一种基于潜在狄利克雷分配的新型特征提取模型,用于使用机器学习对 COVID-19 数据进行分析。
Comput Biol Med. 2021 Nov;138:104920. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104920. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
10
A rumor reversal model of online health information during the Covid-19 epidemic.新冠疫情期间在线健康信息的谣言反转模型
Inf Process Manag. 2021 Nov;58(6):102731. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102731. Epub 2021 Aug 24.