• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优化数字化种植体印模:评估不同扫描体曝光条件下扫描体图像缺失和对位的意义。

Optimizing digital implant impressions: Evaluating the significance of scan body image deficiency and alignment under varied scan body exposures.

机构信息

Dental Implant Centre, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Salaya, Thailand.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Sep 21;18(9):e0291831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291831. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0291831
PMID:37733766
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10513296/
Abstract

In implant dentistry, the advent of intraoral scanning technology has revolutionized traditional clinical processes by streamlining procedures and ensuring predictable treatment outcomes. However, achieving accurate virtual implant positions using intraoral scanners and scan bodies can be influenced by various clinical and laboratory factors. This study aims to investigate the impact of scan body image capture deficiency and scan body alignment methods in computer-aided design (CAD) software on the accuracy of virtual implant positions, particularly in different implant depths. Three stereolithographic half-arch implant models with different implant depths were prepared, representing three scenarios of scan body exposure: full exposed scan body, 2/3 exposed scan body, and 1/3 exposed scan body. The scan body image capture deficiency and alignment methods were simulated using CAD software. The deviation of virtual implant positions obtained from different scenarios were evaluated using 3D analysis software. The highest angular and linear deviation (0.237±0.059 degrees, 0.084±0.068 mm) were found in the 1/4 upper and lower part scan body deficiency using the 1-point alignment method in the 1/3 exposed scan body. Two-way ANOVA analysis revealed significant effects of scan deficiency on virtual implant position deviations across all scan body exposures, except for the linear deviation when the scan body was exposed 2/3 of its length. Furthermore, scan deficiencies in the 1/4 upper and lower parts of the scan body significantly affected implant angular deviation regardless of scan body exposure, while implant linear deviation was specifically affected when the scan body was exposed to only 1/3 of its total length. Deficiencies in scan body acquisition, particularly in deep soft tissue situations, can lead to deviations in both angular and linear positioning of virtual implants. Employing appropriate scan body alignment methods such as a 3-point alignment approach demonstrates better accuracy compared to a 1-point alignment.

摘要

在种植牙科领域,口腔内扫描技术的出现彻底改变了传统的临床流程,使治疗过程更加简化,并确保了可预测的治疗效果。然而,使用口腔内扫描仪和扫描体获得准确的虚拟种植体位置可能会受到各种临床和实验室因素的影响。本研究旨在探讨扫描体图像采集不足和扫描体在 CAD 软件中的对齐方法对虚拟种植体位置准确性的影响,特别是在不同种植深度的情况下。本研究制备了三个具有不同种植深度的立体光刻半口种植体模型,代表了三种扫描体暴露情况:完全暴露的扫描体、2/3 暴露的扫描体和 1/3 暴露的扫描体。使用 CAD 软件模拟了扫描体图像采集不足和对齐方法。使用 3D 分析软件评估了从不同情况下获得的虚拟种植体位置的偏差。在 1/3 暴露的扫描体中,使用 1 点对齐方法时,1/4 上、下扫描体采集不足的情况下,虚拟种植体位置的偏差最大(0.237±0.059 度,0.084±0.068 毫米)。双向方差分析显示,除了扫描体暴露 2/3 长度时的线性偏差外,扫描体采集不足对所有扫描体暴露的虚拟种植体位置偏差均有显著影响。此外,扫描体上、下 1/4 部分的采集不足会显著影响种植体的角度偏差,而当扫描体仅暴露其总长度的 1/3 时,种植体的线性偏差会受到特别影响。扫描体采集不足,尤其是在深部软组织情况下,会导致虚拟种植体的角度和线性定位偏差。与 1 点对齐相比,采用 3 点对齐等适当的扫描体对齐方法可以提高准确性。

相似文献

1
Optimizing digital implant impressions: Evaluating the significance of scan body image deficiency and alignment under varied scan body exposures.优化数字化种植体印模:评估不同扫描体曝光条件下扫描体图像缺失和对位的意义。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 21;18(9):e0291831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291831. eCollection 2023.
2
The Effect of Angulation and Scan Body Position on Scans for Implant-Treated Edentulism: A Clinical Simulation Study.角度和扫描体位置对种植治疗无牙颌扫描的影响:一项临床模拟研究
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Apr;27(2):e70001. doi: 10.1111/cid.70001.
3
Accuracy of Digital Impressions at Varying Implant Depths: An In Vitro Study.不同种植体深度下数字印模的准确性:一项体外研究
J Prosthodont. 2023 Jan;32(1):54-61. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13496. Epub 2022 Mar 13.
4
Effects of scan body exposure and operator on the accuracy of image matching of implant impressions with scan bodies.扫描体的暴露和操作人员对种植体印模与扫描体图像匹配准确性的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Sep;124(3):379.e1-379.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.04.004. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
5
The effect of the improperly scanned scan body images on the accuracy of virtual implant positioning in computer-aided design software.扫描体图像扫描不当对计算机辅助设计软件中虚拟种植体定位准确性的影响。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2020 Jun;12(3):107-113. doi: 10.4047/jap.2020.12.3.107. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
6
Effect of using scan body accessories and inter-implant distances on the accuracy of complete arch implant digital impressions: An in vitro study.使用扫描体附件和种植体间距离对全牙弓种植体数字化印模准确性的影响:一项体外研究。
J Prosthodont. 2024 Apr 9. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13856.
7
Scanning accuracy with splinted and unsplinted implant scan bodies for the edentulous arch at implant level: an in vitro study.种植体水平下无牙颌使用带夹板和不带夹板的种植体扫描体的扫描准确性:一项体外研究。
J Oral Implantol. 2022 Jul 11. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-21-00293.
8
Does the geometry of scan bodies affect the alignment accuracy of computer-aided design in implant digital workflow: An in vitro study?扫描体的几何形状是否会影响种植体数字化流程中计算机辅助设计的定位精度:一项体外研究?
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Mar;33(3):313-321. doi: 10.1111/clr.13890. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
9
Accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions taken using intraoral scanners and related variables: A systematic review.采用口内扫描仪获取全口数字化种植体印模的准确性及其相关变量:系统评价。
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2021 May 12;14(2):157-179.
10
Effect of different surface locking patterns on the trueness of complete arch digital implant scans: An in vitro study.不同表面锁定模式对全弓数字化种植体扫描精度的影响:一项体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Sep;132(3):601.e1-601.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.05.019. Epub 2024 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Correction: Optimizing digital implant impressions: Evaluating the significance of scan body image deficiency and alignment under varied scan body exposures.更正:优化数字化种植体印模:评估不同扫描体曝光条件下扫描体图像缺陷和对齐的重要性。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 10;19(12):e0315735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315735. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Digital workflow in implant prosthodontics: The critical aspects for reliable accuracy.种植义齿修复中的数字化工作流程:实现可靠精度的关键因素
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023 Jan;35(1):250-261. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13004. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
2
Investigation of the Accuracy of Four Intraoral Scanners in Mandibular Full-Arch Digital Implant Impression: A Comparative In Vitro Study.四种口内扫描仪在下颌全颌数字化种植印模中的准确性研究:一项比较性的体外研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 13;19(8):4719. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084719.
3
Influence of the implant scan body bevel location, implant angulation and position on intraoral scanning accuracy: An in vitro study.
种植体扫描体斜度位置、种植体角度和位置对口腔内扫描精度的影响:一项体外研究。
J Dent. 2022 Jun;121:104122. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104122. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
4
Different Implant Subgingival Depth Affects the Trueness and Precision of the 3D Dental Implant Position: A Comparative in Vitro Study Among Five Digital Scanners and a Conventional Technique.不同种植体龈下深度对三维牙种植体位置的准确性和精确性的影响:五种数字扫描仪与传统技术的体外比较研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 Nov-Dec;36(6):1111-1120. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9014.
5
Comparison of Dental Stone Models and Their 3D Printed Acrylic Replicas for the Accuracy and Mechanical Properties.牙科石膏模型及其3D打印丙烯酸复制品在精度和力学性能方面的比较
Materials (Basel). 2020 Sep 13;13(18):4066. doi: 10.3390/ma13184066.
6
The effect of the improperly scanned scan body images on the accuracy of virtual implant positioning in computer-aided design software.扫描体图像扫描不当对计算机辅助设计软件中虚拟种植体定位准确性的影响。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2020 Jun;12(3):107-113. doi: 10.4047/jap.2020.12.3.107. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
7
Digital scanning for complete-arch implant-supported restorations: A systematic review.全牙弓种植支持修复体的数字扫描:一项系统评价。
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Aug;124(2):161-167. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.014. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
8
Accuracy of 3D Printed Models Created by Two Technologies of Printers with Different Designs of Model Base.两种不同模型基底设计的 3D 打印机打印模型的精度比较。
J Prosthodont. 2020 Feb;29(2):124-128. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13107. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
9
Accuracy of printed casts generated from digital implant impressions versus stone casts from conventional implant impressions: A comparative in vitro study.数字化种植体印模与传统种植体印模制取石膏模型的精度比较:一项体外研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Aug;29(8):835-842. doi: 10.1111/clr.13297. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
10
Evaluation of the Accuracy of Conventional and Digital Impression Techniques for Implant Restorations.评估常规和数字化印模技术在种植体修复中的准确性。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Feb;28(2):e530-e535. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12799. Epub 2018 May 1.