Vitas Marko, Dobovišek Andrej
Laze pri Borovnici 38, 1353, Borovnica, Slovenia.
University of Maribor, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Koroška Cesta 160, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia; University of Maribor, Faculty of Medicine, Taborska Ulica 6B, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia.
Biosystems. 2023 Nov;233:105031. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2023.105031. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
Modern science has still not provided a satisfactory empirical explanation for the increasing complexity of living organisms through evolutionary history. As no agreed-upon definitions of the complexity exist, the working definition of biological complexity has been formulated. There is no theoretical reason to expect evolutionary lineages to increase in complexity over time, and there is no empirical evidence that they do so. In our discussion we have assumed the hypothesis that at the origins of life, evolution had to first involve autocatalytic systems that only subsequently acquired the capacity of genetic heredity. We discuss the role of Darwinian selection in evolution and pose the hypothesis that Darwinian selection acts predominantly as a retrograde driving force of evolution. In this context we understand the term retrograde evolution as a degeneration of living systems from higher complexity towards living systems with lower complexity. With the proposed hypothesis we have closed the gap between Darwinism and Lamarckism early in the evolutionary process. By Lamarckism, the action of a special principle called complexification force is understood here rather than inheritance of acquired characteristics.
现代科学仍未对生物在进化史上日益增加的复杂性给出令人满意的实证解释。由于不存在关于复杂性的公认定义,因此制定了生物复杂性的工作定义。没有理论依据预期进化谱系会随时间推移而增加复杂性,也没有实证证据表明它们确实如此。在我们的讨论中,我们假设了这样一个假说:在生命起源时,进化首先必须涉及自催化系统,这些系统随后才获得遗传遗传能力。我们讨论了达尔文选择在进化中的作用,并提出假说,即达尔文选择主要作为进化的逆向驱动力起作用。在这种背景下,我们将逆向进化这一术语理解为生命系统从较高复杂性向较低复杂性生命系统的退化。通过提出的假说,我们在进化过程早期就弥合了达尔文主义和拉马克主义之间的差距。在这里,通过拉马克主义,理解的是一种称为复杂化力的特殊原理的作用,而不是获得性特征的遗传。