• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Increasing the transparency of systematic reviews: presenting a generalized registration form.提高系统评价透明度:呈现通用注册表格。
Syst Rev. 2023 Sep 22;12(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02281-7.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Legal concerns in health-related artificial intelligence: a scoping review protocol.健康相关人工智能的法律问题:范围综述方案
Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 17;11(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01939-y.
5
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review.评价系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明及其扩展的采用和影响:范围综述。
Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 19;6(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0663-8.
6
The association between hospital financial performance and the quality of care-a scoping review protocol.医院财务绩效与医疗质量之间的关联:范围综述研究方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 10;10(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01778-3.
7
WHO/ILO work-related burden of disease and injury: Protocol for systematic reviews of exposure to occupational ergonomic risk factors and of the effect of exposure to occupational ergonomic risk factors on osteoarthritis of hip or knee and selected other musculoskeletal diseases.世卫组织/国际劳工组织与工作相关的疾病和伤害负担:职业人体工程学风险因素暴露和职业人体工程学风险因素暴露对髋关节或膝关节骨关节炎和其他选定肌肉骨骼疾病影响的系统评价议定书。
Environ Int. 2019 Apr;125:554-566. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.09.053. Epub 2018 Dec 22.
8
A Critical Analysis of Reporting in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in the Peyronie's Disease Literature.对佩罗尼病文献中系统评价和荟萃分析报告的批判性分析。
J Sex Med. 2022 Apr;19(4):629-640. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2022.01.008. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
9
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
10
Process of pain assessment in people with dementia living in nursing homes: a scoping review protocol.养老院中痴呆患者疼痛评估流程:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 28;12(9):e063230. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063230.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of Cardiovascular Risk Factors Among Adults in the European Union: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.欧盟成年人心血管危险因素的患病率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 14;14(16):5752. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165752.
2
Neurotechnological Approaches to Cognitive Rehabilitation in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review of Neuromodulation, EEG, Virtual Reality, and Emerging AI Applications.轻度认知障碍认知康复的神经技术方法:神经调节、脑电图、虚拟现实及新兴人工智能应用的系统综述
Brain Sci. 2025 May 28;15(6):582. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15060582.
3
In Vivo Evidence of Melatonin's Protective Role in Alkylating-Agent-Induced Pulmonary Toxicity: A Systematic Review.褪黑素在烷化剂诱导的肺毒性中保护作用的体内证据:一项系统评价。
Antioxidants (Basel). 2025 Jun 11;14(6):712. doi: 10.3390/antiox14060712.
4
Brain-Inspired Multisensory Learning: A Systematic Review of Neuroplasticity and Cognitive Outcomes in Adult Multicultural and Second Language Acquisition.受脑启发的多感官学习:成人多元文化和第二语言习得中神经可塑性与认知结果的系统综述
Biomimetics (Basel). 2025 Jun 12;10(6):397. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics10060397.
5
Psychological correlates of hearing protective behaviors in adolescents and young adults: a systematic review.青少年和青年成人听力保护行为的心理关联:一项系统综述
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2025 Jun 17;13(1):2507264. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2025.2507264. eCollection 2025.
6
Comparison of TAVR with SAVR on clinical outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)与外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)治疗主动脉瓣狭窄患者临床结局的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 May 21;87(6):3768-3776. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003275. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
Digital and AI-Enhanced Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia: Neurocognitive Mechanisms and Clinical Outcomes.数字与人工智能增强的失眠认知行为疗法:神经认知机制与临床结果
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 26;14(7):2265. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072265.
8
From Neural Networks to Emotional Networks: A Systematic Review of EEG-Based Emotion Recognition in Cognitive Neuroscience and Real-World Applications.从神经网络到情感网络:认知神经科学与现实世界应用中基于脑电图的情感识别系统综述
Brain Sci. 2025 Feb 20;15(3):220. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15030220.
9
Next-Generation Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Depression: Integrating Digital Tools, Teletherapy, and Personalization for Enhanced Mental Health Outcomes.下一代抑郁症认知行为疗法:整合数字工具、远程治疗和个性化以改善心理健康结果。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Feb 28;61(3):431. doi: 10.3390/medicina61030431.
10
Exploring how health inequalities are conceptualised and measured in patient experience surveys in acute care: a protocol for a scoping review.探索急性护理患者体验调查中健康不平等如何被概念化和衡量:一项范围综述方案
HRB Open Res. 2024 Nov 26;7:74. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13998.1. eCollection 2024.

提高系统评价透明度:呈现通用注册表格。

Increasing the transparency of systematic reviews: presenting a generalized registration form.

机构信息

Department of Methodology & Statistics, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

Department of Theory Methodology & Statistics, Open University, Heerlen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2023 Sep 22;12(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02281-7.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-023-02281-7
PMID:37736736
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10514995/
Abstract

This paper presents a generalized registration form for systematic reviews that can be used when currently available forms are not adequate. The form is designed to be applicable across disciplines (i.e., psychology, economics, law, physics, or any other field) and across review types (i.e., scoping review, review of qualitative studies, meta-analysis, or any other type of review). That means that the reviewed records may include research reports as well as archive documents, case law, books, poems, etc. Items were selected and formulated to optimize broad applicability instead of specificity, forgoing some benefits afforded by a tighter focus. This PRISMA 2020 compliant form is a fallback for more specialized forms and can be used if no specialized form or registration platform is available. When accessing this form on the Open Science Framework website, users will therefore first be guided to specialized forms when they exist. In addition to this use case, the form can also serve as a starting point for creating registration forms that cater to specific fields or review types.

摘要

本文提出了一种通用的系统评价注册表格,可用于当前可用表格不充分的情况。该表格旨在适用于不同学科(即心理学、经济学、法学、物理学或任何其他领域)和不同类型的综述(即范围综述、定性研究综述、荟萃分析或任何其他类型的综述)。这意味着被评价的记录可能包括研究报告以及档案文件、判例法、书籍、诗歌等。选择和制定项目是为了优化广泛的适用性,而不是特异性,因此放弃了一些更紧密关注所带来的好处。这个符合 PRISMA 2020 的表格是更专门表格的备用表格,如果没有专门的表格或注册平台可用,也可以使用。当用户在开放科学框架网站上访问此表格时,首先会引导他们使用专门的表格,如果存在的话。除了这种用法之外,该表格还可以作为创建满足特定领域或综述类型的注册表格的起点。