Vetter Philipp, Eckl Larissa, Bellmann Frederik, Moroder Philipp, Audigé Laurent, Scheibel Markus
Department of Traumatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Dec;31(12):5962-5969. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07570-1. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations are usually graded radiographically according to Rockwood, but differentiation between Rockwood types III and V may be ambiguous. The potentially clinically relevant horizontal instability is barely addressed in coronal radiographs. It was hypothesized that a new radiologic parameter (V angle) would complement ACJ diagnostics on anteroposterior radiographs by differentiating between cases of Rockwood III and V while also considering the aspect of dynamic horizontal translation (DHT).
Ninety-five patients with acute ACJ dislocations (Rockwood types III and V) were included retrospectively between 2017 and 2020. On anteroposterior views (weightbearing: n = 62, non-weight-bearing: n = 33), the coracoclavicular (CC) distance and the newly introduced V angle for assessing scapular orientation were measured bilaterally. This angle is referenced between the spinal column and a line crossing the superior scapular angle and the crossing point between the supraspinatus fossa and the medial base of the coracoid process, reported as the side-comparative difference (non-injured side minus injured side). DHT on Alexander views was divided into stable, partially unstable or completely unstable.
The V angle on the injured side alone (mean 50.0°; 95% confidence interval (CI), 48.6°-51.3°) showed no correlation with the side-comparative CC distance [%] (r = - 0.040; n.s.). Thus, the V angle on the non-injured side was considered, displaying a normal distribution (n.s.) with a mean of 58.0° (95% CI, 56.6°-59.4°). The side-comparative V angle showed a correlation with the side-comparative CC distance (r = 0.83; p < 0.001) and was able to differentiate between Rockwood types III (4.7°; 95% CI, 3.9°-5.5°; n = 39) and V (10.3°; 95% CI, 9.7°-11.0°; n = 56) (p < 0.001). A cut-off value of 7° had a 94.6% sensitivity and an 82.1% specificity (area under curve, AUC: 0.954; 95% CI, 0.915-0.994). The side-comparative V angle was greater for cases with complete DHT (8.7°; 95% CI, 7.9°-9.5°; n = 78) than for cases with partial DHT (4.8°; 95% CI, 3.3°-6.3°; n = 16) (p < 0.001). A cut-off value of 5° showed a sensitivity of 84.6% and a specificity of 66.7% (AUC 0.824; 95% CI, 0.725-0.924).
The scapular-based V angle on anteroposterior radiographs distinguishes between Rockwood types III and V as well as cases with partial or complete DHT.
Diagnostic study.
Level II.
肩锁关节(ACJ)脱位通常根据罗克伍德(Rockwood)分类法进行影像学分级,但罗克伍德Ⅲ型和Ⅴ型之间的区分可能不明确。在冠状位X线片上,潜在的临床相关水平不稳定几乎未得到体现。研究假设,一个新的放射学参数(V角)将通过区分罗克伍德Ⅲ型和Ⅴ型病例,并同时考虑动态水平移位(DHT)方面,来辅助前后位X线片对ACJ的诊断。
回顾性纳入2017年至2020年间95例急性ACJ脱位患者(罗克伍德Ⅲ型和Ⅴ型)。在前后位片上(负重位:n = 62,非负重位:n = 33),双侧测量喙锁(CC)间距以及新引入的用于评估肩胛骨方向的V角。该角度是指脊柱与一条穿过肩胛上角以及冈上窝与喙突内侧基部交点的连线之间的夹角,以双侧对比差值(非损伤侧减去损伤侧)表示。亚历山大位片上的DHT分为稳定、部分不稳定或完全不稳定。
仅损伤侧的V角(平均50.0°;95%置信区间(CI),48.6° - 51.3°)与双侧对比CC间距[%]无相关性(r = - 0.040;无统计学意义)。因此,考虑非损伤侧的V角,其呈正态分布(无统计学意义),均值为58.0°(95% CI,56.6° - 59.4°)。双侧对比V角与双侧对比CC间距相关(r = 0.83;p < 0.001),并且能够区分罗克伍德Ⅲ型(4.7°;95% CI,3.9° - 5.5°;n = 39)和Ⅴ型(10.3°;95% CI,9.7° - 11.0°;n = 56)(p < 0.001)。截断值为7°时,灵敏度为94.6%,特异度为82.1%(曲线下面积,AUC:0.954;95% CI,0.915 - 0.994)。完全DHT病例的双侧对比V角(8.7°;95% CI,7.9° - 9.5°;n = 78)大于部分DHT病例(4.8°;95% CI,3.3° - 6.3°;n = 16)(p < 0.001)。截断值为5°时,灵敏度为84.6%,特异度为66.7%(AUC 0.824;95% CI,0.725 - 0.924)。
前后位X线片上基于肩胛骨的V角可区分罗克伍德Ⅲ型和Ⅴ型以及部分或完全DHT病例。
诊断性研究。
Ⅱ级。