• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Germline Pathogenic Variants and Genetic Counseling by Ancestry in Patients With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.胚系致病性变异与卵巢上皮癌患者的家族遗传咨询。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2023 Sep;7:e2300137. doi: 10.1200/PO.23.00137.
2
Disparities in cancer genetics care by race/ethnicity among pan-cancer patients with pathogenic germline variants.泛癌种携带致病变异体种系变异患者的种族/民族差异与癌症遗传学护理。
Cancer. 2022 Nov 1;128(21):3870-3879. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34434. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
3
Pathogenic germline variants in patients with endometrial cancer of diverse ancestry.不同种系来源的子宫内膜癌患者中的致病性种系变异。
Cancer. 2024 Feb 15;130(4):576-587. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35071. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
4
Causality and functional relevance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants in non-high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas.BRCA1和BRCA2致病变异在非高级别浆液性卵巢癌中的因果关系及功能相关性
J Pathol. 2024 Feb;262(2):137-146. doi: 10.1002/path.6218. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
5
Probability of detecting germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants in histological subtypes of ovarian carcinoma. A meta-analysis.卵巢癌组织学亚型中胚系 BRCA1/2 致病性变异的检测概率。一项荟萃分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Jan;164(1):221-230. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.10.072. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
6
Predicting the likelihood of a pathogenic variant being somatic by testing only tumour DNA in non-mucinous high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer.仅检测非黏液性高级别上皮性卵巢癌的肿瘤 DNA 预测致病性变异为体细胞的可能性。
J Clin Pathol. 2023 Oct;76(10):684-689. doi: 10.1136/jcp-2022-208369. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
7
Variants Identified Through Tumor Genomic Profiling: Assessing Genetic Counseling Outcomes.通过肿瘤基因组分析鉴定的变异:评估遗传咨询结果。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2022 Oct;6:e2100375. doi: 10.1200/PO.21.00375.
8
Frequency of germline pathogenic variants in breast cancer predisposition genes among young Turkish breast cancer patients.年轻土耳其乳腺癌患者中乳腺癌易感基因种系致病性变异的频率。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Nov;202(2):297-304. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07074-z. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
9
Time Trends in Receipt of Germline Genetic Testing and Results for Women Diagnosed With Breast Cancer or Ovarian Cancer, 2012-2019.2012-2019 年乳腺癌或卵巢癌诊断女性的种系基因检测及结果的时间趋势。
J Clin Oncol. 2021 May 20;39(15):1631-1640. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02785. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
10
Uptake of testing for germline mutations in patients with non-mucinous epithelial ovarian cancers in Western Australia: a comparison of different genetic counseling methods.西澳大利亚州非黏液性上皮性卵巢癌患者种系突变检测的应用:不同遗传咨询方法的比较。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Jul;29(6):1038-1042. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000389. Epub 2019 May 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Global, regional, and national burden of ovarian cancer in women aged 45 + from 1990 to 2021 and projections for 2050: a systematic analysis based on the 2021 global burden of disease study.1990年至2021年45岁及以上女性卵巢癌的全球、区域和国家负担以及2050年预测:基于2021年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2025 Aug 2;151(8):225. doi: 10.1007/s00432-025-06277-9.
2
Homologous recombination deficiency in ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma by self-reported race.根据自我报告的种族分析卵巢高级别浆液性癌中的同源重组缺陷
medRxiv. 2025 Jan 28:2025.01.21.25320918. doi: 10.1101/2025.01.21.25320918.
3
Optimizing Mainstreaming of Genetic Testing in Parallel With Ovarian and Endometrial Cancer Tumor Testing: How Do We Maximize Our Impact?优化基因检测与卵巢癌和子宫内膜癌肿瘤检测并行的主流化:我们如何最大化我们的影响?
JCO Precis Oncol. 2024 Dec;8:e2400525. doi: 10.1200/PO-24-00525. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
4
Mainstreaming in parallel with ovarian cancer tumor testing to improve genetic testing uptake.与卵巢癌肿瘤检测并行实施主流化,以提高基因检测的采用率。
Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Apr;183:126-132. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.03.005. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
5
Early-Onset Ovarian Cancer <30 Years: What Do We Know about Its Genetic Predisposition?早发性卵巢癌(<30 岁):其遗传易感性方面我们了解多少?
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Nov 30;24(23):17020. doi: 10.3390/ijms242317020.

本文引用的文献

1
Disparities According to Genetic Ancestry in the Use of Precision Oncology Assays.精准肿瘤学检测使用中基于遗传血统的差异
N Engl J Med. 2023 Jan 19;388(3):281-283. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2213457.
2
Healthcare Access Dimensions and Guideline-Concordant Ovarian Cancer Treatment: SEER-Medicare Analysis of the ORCHiD Study.医疗保健可及性维度与符合指南的卵巢癌治疗:SEER-Medicare对ORCHiD研究的分析
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022 Nov;20(11):1255-1266.e11. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.7055.
3
Genetic Ancestry Correlates with Somatic Differences in a Real-World Clinical Cancer Sequencing Cohort.遗传背景与真实世界临床癌症测序队列中的体细胞差异相关。
Cancer Discov. 2022 Nov 2;12(11):2552-2565. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-22-0312.
4
Disparities in cancer genetics care by race/ethnicity among pan-cancer patients with pathogenic germline variants.泛癌种携带致病变异体种系变异患者的种族/民族差异与癌症遗传学护理。
Cancer. 2022 Nov 1;128(21):3870-3879. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34434. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
5
Genetic Testing for All: Overcoming Disparities in Ovarian Cancer Genetic Testing.全民基因检测:克服卵巢癌基因检测中的差异
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2022 Apr;42:1-12. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_350292.
6
Retrospective assessment of barriers and access to genetic services for hereditary cancer syndromes in an integrated health care delivery system.在综合医疗服务体系中对遗传性癌症综合征的遗传服务障碍及可及性进行回顾性评估。
Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2022 Feb 10;20(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13053-022-00213-5.
7
Racial Biology and Medical Misconceptions.种族生物学与医学误解。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Feb 10;386(6):501-503. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2116224. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
8
Cancer statistics, 2022.癌症统计数据,2022 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Jan;72(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
9
Disparities in telemedicine during COVID-19.新冠肺炎疫情期间的远程医疗差距。
Cancer Med. 2022 Feb;11(4):1192-1201. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4518. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
10
The context-specific role of germline pathogenicity in tumorigenesis.种系致病性在肿瘤发生中的语境特异性作用。
Nat Genet. 2021 Nov;53(11):1577-1585. doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00949-1. Epub 2021 Nov 5.

胚系致病性变异与卵巢上皮癌患者的家族遗传咨询。

Germline Pathogenic Variants and Genetic Counseling by Ancestry in Patients With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

机构信息

Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.

Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.

出版信息

JCO Precis Oncol. 2023 Sep;7:e2300137. doi: 10.1200/PO.23.00137.

DOI:10.1200/PO.23.00137
PMID:37738546
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10861001/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate rates of germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (PVs) and genetic counseling by ancestry in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

METHODS

Patients with pathologically confirmed EOC who underwent clinical tumor-normal sequencing from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2020, inclusive of germline analysis of ≥76 genes were included. Patients with newly identified PVs were referred for Clinical Genetics Service (CGS) counseling. Ancestry groups were defined using self-reported race/ethnicity and Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) heritage. Genetic ancestry was inferred computationally using validated algorithms. Logistic regression models were built.

RESULTS

Of 1,266 patients, self-reported ancestry (AJ, 17%; Asian, 10%; Black/African American, 5.4%; Hispanic, 6.2%; non-Hispanic White, 57%; other, 0.16%; unknown, 4.0%) correlated with genetic ancestry (AJ ancestry, 18%; admixed, 10%; African, 4%; East Asian [EAS], 6%; European, 56%; Native American, 0.2%; South Asian [SAS], 4%; unknown, 2%). Germline PVs were observed in 313 (25%) patients, including 195 (15%) with PVs in EOC-associated genes. Those with PVs were younger at diagnosis (59 62 years; < .001) and more likely to have high-grade serous ovarian cancer (83% 72%; = .009). PV prevalence varied between ancestry groups ( < .001), with highest rates in the AJ (39.9%) and Asian (26.5%) groups and similar rates (>10%) across other ancestry groups. Use of genetic ancestry demonstrated similar findings and further characterized high rates of PV in EAS/SAS groups. Younger age, high-grade serous histology, and self-reported AJ or Asian ancestry were associated with PV in an EOC-associated gene. Rates of CGS counseling for newly identified PVs were high (80%) across ancestry groups.

CONCLUSION

Rates of PV, particularly in EOC-associated genes, were high regardless of ancestry, with similar rates of counseling between groups, emphasizing the importance of universal genetic testing in all patients with EOC.

摘要

目的

评估上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)患者种系致病性/可能致病性变异(PVs)的发生率和按种族进行遗传咨询。

方法

纳入了 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间接受临床肿瘤-正常测序且种系分析至少 76 个基因的病理证实为 EOC 的患者。发现新的 PV 患者将被推荐接受临床遗传学服务(CGS)咨询。采用自我报告的种族/民族和阿什肯纳兹犹太人(AJ)血统定义种族群体。采用经过验证的算法进行遗传祖先的计算推断。建立逻辑回归模型。

结果

在 1266 名患者中,自我报告的种族(AJ,17%;亚洲人,10%;黑种人/非裔美国人,5.4%;西班牙裔,6.2%;非西班牙裔白人,57%;其他,0.16%;未知,4.0%)与遗传祖先(AJ 血统,18%;混血,10%;非洲人,4%;东亚人 [EAS],6%;欧洲人,56%;美洲原住民,0.2%;南亚人 [SAS],4%;未知,2%)相关。313 名(25%)患者中发现种系 PV,包括 195 名(15%)EOC 相关基因的 PV 患者。PV 患者的诊断年龄较小(59 62 岁;<.001),且更可能患有高级别浆液性卵巢癌(83% 72%;=.009)。不同种族群体之间的 PV 发生率存在差异(<.001),AJ(39.9%)和亚洲(26.5%)组的发生率最高,其他组的发生率相似(>10%)。遗传祖先的使用得出了相似的结果,并进一步表明 EAS/SAS 组的 PV 发生率较高。年轻、高级别浆液性组织学和自我报告的 AJ 或亚洲血统与 EOC 相关基因中的 PV 相关。在所有患者中,新发现的 PVs 的 CGS 咨询率都很高(80%),无论其种族如何。

结论

无论种族如何,PV 的发生率均较高,尤其是在 EOC 相关基因中,各组之间的咨询率相似,这强调了在所有 EOC 患者中进行通用基因检测的重要性。