• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环磷酰胺诱导早期缓解,在抗 PLA2R 抗体水平较高的特发性膜性肾病患者中优于利妥昔单抗。

Cyclophosphamide induced early remission and was superior to rituximab in idiopathic membranous nephropathy patients with high anti-PLA2R antibody levels.

机构信息

Division of Nephrology, Kidney Institute of CPLA, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University (Navy Medical University),

Department of Nephrology, No. 2 People's Hospital of Fuyang City, Fuyang, 236000, Anhui Province, China.

出版信息

BMC Nephrol. 2023 Sep 22;24(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12882-023-03307-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12882-023-03307-x
PMID:37740193
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10517553/
Abstract

Rituximab (RTX) and cyclophosphamide (CYC) based treatments are both recommended as first-line therapies in idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) by KDIGO 2021 guideline. However, the efficacy of RTX vs. CYC-based treatments in IMN is still controversial. We performed this systemic review and meta-analysis registered in PROSPERO (CRD 42,022,355,717) by pooling data from randomized controlled trials or cohort studies in IMN patients using the EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane libraries (till Orc 1, 2022). The primary outcomes were the complete remission (CR) rate + partial remission (PR) rate. CR rate, immunologic response rate, relapse rate, and the risk of serious adverse events (SAE) were secondary outcomes. Eight studies involving 600 adult patients with IMN were included with a median follow-up duration of 12 to 60 months. RTX induced a similar overall remission rate compared with CYC (RR 0.88, 95% CI: 0.71, 1.09, P = 0.23). At the follow-up time of 6 months, RTX was associated with a lower CR + PR rate compared with CYC (RR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.52, 0.88, P = 0.003). Moreover, RTX might be less effective in inducing CR + PR than CYC treatment in IMN patients with high antiPLA2R antibody levels (RR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.48, 0.94, P = 0.02). The occurrences of CRs, relapse rates, immunologic response rates, and SAE were not significantly different between RTX and CYC, respectively. In conclusion, although the long-term efficacy and safety of CYC compared to RTX were comparable, CYC might respond faster and be more advantageous in IMN patients with high antiPLA2R antibody titers.

摘要

RTX 和基于 CYC 的治疗均被 KDIGO 2021 指南推荐为特发性膜性肾病(IMN)的一线治疗方法。然而,RTX 与基于 CYC 的治疗在 IMN 中的疗效仍存在争议。我们通过在 EMBASE、PubMed 和 Cochrane 图书馆中对 IMN 患者的随机对照试验或队列研究进行数据汇总,进行了这项系统评价和荟萃分析,并在 PROSPERO 中进行了注册(CRD42022355717)。主要结局是完全缓解(CR)率+部分缓解(PR)率。CR 率、免疫反应率、复发率和严重不良事件(SAE)风险为次要结局。纳入了 8 项涉及 600 例成人 IMN 患者的研究,中位随访时间为 12 至 60 个月。RTX 诱导的总缓解率与 CYC 相似(RR0.88,95%CI:0.71,1.09,P=0.23)。在 6 个月的随访时间,与 CYC 相比,RTX 与较低的 CR+PR 率相关(RR0.67,95%CI:0.52,0.88,P=0.003)。此外,在抗 PLA2R 抗体水平较高的 IMN 患者中,RTX 诱导 CR+PR 的效果可能不如 CYC 治疗(RR0.67,95%CI:0.48,0.94,P=0.02)。RTX 与 CYC 之间 CR 发生情况、复发率、免疫反应率和 SAE 的发生率无显著差异。总之,虽然 CYC 的长期疗效和安全性与 RTX 相当,但 CYC 可能在抗 PLA2R 抗体滴度较高的 IMN 患者中起效更快且更具优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5e4/10517553/590c0a9dbac5/12882_2023_3307_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5e4/10517553/e2f30b9ca8b7/12882_2023_3307_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5e4/10517553/bd30fad74276/12882_2023_3307_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5e4/10517553/b2913309efc5/12882_2023_3307_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5e4/10517553/34c2ae356573/12882_2023_3307_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5e4/10517553/e1e2c1b975f4/12882_2023_3307_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5e4/10517553/590c0a9dbac5/12882_2023_3307_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5e4/10517553/e2f30b9ca8b7/12882_2023_3307_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5e4/10517553/bd30fad74276/12882_2023_3307_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5e4/10517553/b2913309efc5/12882_2023_3307_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5e4/10517553/34c2ae356573/12882_2023_3307_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5e4/10517553/e1e2c1b975f4/12882_2023_3307_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5e4/10517553/590c0a9dbac5/12882_2023_3307_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cyclophosphamide induced early remission and was superior to rituximab in idiopathic membranous nephropathy patients with high anti-PLA2R antibody levels.环磷酰胺诱导早期缓解,在抗 PLA2R 抗体水平较高的特发性膜性肾病患者中优于利妥昔单抗。
BMC Nephrol. 2023 Sep 22;24(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12882-023-03307-x.
2
[Comparison of efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive therapy and rituximab targeting therapy in idiopathic membranous nephropathy].免疫抑制治疗与利妥昔单抗靶向治疗在特发性膜性肾病中的疗效与安全性比较
Xi Bao Yu Fen Zi Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Jul;40(7):636-641.
3
Efficacy and safety of rituximab in the treatment of membranous nephropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.利妥昔单抗治疗膜性肾病的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Apr;99(16):e19804. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019804.
4
Optimized rituximab regimen versus recommended regimen for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A single-center retrospective cohort study.优化利妥昔单抗方案与特发性膜性肾病推荐方案的比较:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2024 Mar 30;130:111718. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2024.111718. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
5
Combination of rituximab and short-term glucocorticoids in the treatment of anti-phospholipase A receptor antibody positive idiopathic membranous nephropathy.利妥昔单抗联合短期糖皮质激素治疗抗磷脂酶 A2 受体抗体阳性特发性膜性肾病。
Clin Exp Med. 2023 Dec;23(8):5337-5343. doi: 10.1007/s10238-023-01183-1. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
6
PLA2R-IgG4 antibody as a predictive biomarker of treatment effectiveness and prognostic evaluation in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a retrospective study.PLA2R-IgG4 抗体作为特发性膜性肾病患者治疗效果和预后评估的预测生物标志物:一项回顾性研究。
PeerJ. 2022 Oct 10;10:e14193. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14193. eCollection 2022.
7
Immunosuppressive treatment for idiopathic membranous nephropathy in adults with nephrotic syndrome.成人肾病综合征特发性膜性肾病的免疫抑制治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 16;2014(10):CD004293. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004293.pub3.
8
Combination of Rituximab and Low-dose Tacrolimus in the Treatment of Refractory Membranous Nephropathy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.利妥昔单抗联合低剂量他克莫司治疗难治性膜性肾病:一项回顾性队列研究。
Balkan Med J. 2023 Jul 12;40(4):287-293. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2023.2022-9-7. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
9
Rituximab for the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy with nephrotic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.利妥昔单抗治疗肾病综合征特发性膜性肾病的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Turk J Med Sci. 2021 Dec 13;51(6):2870-2880. doi: 10.3906/sag-2104-177.
10
Safety of Rituximab Compared with Steroids and Cyclophosphamide for Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy.利妥昔单抗与类固醇及环磷酰胺治疗特发性膜性肾病的安全性比较
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Sep;28(9):2729-2737. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016091022. Epub 2017 May 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost per Response of Acthar® Gel vs Standard of Care for the Treatment of Proteinuria in Nephrotic Syndrome Due to Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy Among Adults from the US Healthcare Perspective.从美国医疗保健角度看,Acthar®凝胶与标准治疗方案治疗成人特发性膜性肾病所致肾病综合征蛋白尿的每反应成本。
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2025 Aug 6;12(2):50-61. doi: 10.36469/001c.142078. eCollection 2025.
2
Rituximab, tacrolimus, cyclophosphamide and cyclosporin in primary membranous nephropathy with nephrotic syndrome: comparison of safety profiles, effect on remission rate, 24-h urinary total protein, serum albumin, and serum creatinine levels using network meta-analysis.利妥昔单抗、他克莫司、环磷酰胺和环孢素治疗原发性膜性肾病伴肾病综合征:使用网状Meta分析比较安全性、对缓解率、24小时尿总蛋白、血清白蛋白和血清肌酐水平的影响
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 May 8. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04549-4.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Novel Treatments Paradigms: Membranous Nephropathy.新型治疗模式:膜性肾病
Kidney Int Rep. 2023 Jan 2;8(3):419-431. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.12.011. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
Efficacy and safety of 12 immunosuppressive agents for idiopathic membranous nephropathy in adults: A pairwise and network meta-analysis.12种免疫抑制剂治疗成人特发性膜性肾病的疗效与安全性:一项成对和网状荟萃分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jul 25;13:917532. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.917532. eCollection 2022.
3
Membranous nephropathy: new pathogenic mechanisms and their clinical implications.
Efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal medicines combined with biomedicine in the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.中药联合生物医学治疗特发性膜性肾病的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Oct 30;15:1391675. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1391675. eCollection 2024.
膜性肾病:新的发病机制及其临床意义。
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2022 Jul;18(7):466-478. doi: 10.1038/s41581-022-00564-1. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
4
Rituximab Is Preferable to Cyclophosphamide for Treatment of Membranous Nephropathy: PRO.利妥昔单抗治疗膜性肾病优于环磷酰胺:支持观点。
Kidney360. 2021 Apr 19;2(11):1696-1698. doi: 10.34067/KID.0001842021. eCollection 2021 Nov 25.
5
Immunosuppression therapy for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: systematic review with network meta-analysis.特发性膜性肾病的免疫抑制治疗:系统评价与网络荟萃分析。
J Nephrol. 2022 May;35(4):1159-1170. doi: 10.1007/s40620-022-01268-2. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
6
Recent Clinical Trials Insights into the Treatment of Primary Membranous Nephropathy.近期原发性膜性肾病治疗的临床试验观察
Drugs. 2022 Feb;82(2):109-132. doi: 10.1007/s40265-021-01656-1. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
7
Immunosuppressive Therapy in Primary Membranous Nephropathy with Compromised Renal Function.肾功能受损的原发性膜性肾病的免疫抑制治疗
Nephron. 2022;146(2):138-145. doi: 10.1159/000518609. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
8
Anti-PLA2R1 Antibodies as Prognostic Biomarker in Membranous Nephropathy.抗磷脂酶A2受体1抗体作为膜性肾病的预后生物标志物
Kidney Int Rep. 2021 Apr 22;6(6):1677-1686. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.04.002. eCollection 2021 Jun.
9
Rituximab or Cyclophosphamide in the Treatment of Membranous Nephropathy: The RI-CYCLO Randomized Trial.利妥昔单抗或环磷酰胺治疗膜性肾病:RI-CYCLO随机试验
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Apr;32(4):972-982. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020071091. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
10
Efficacy and cost of different treatment in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.特发性膜性肾病患者不同治疗方法的疗效和成本:一项网络荟萃分析和成本效益分析。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2021 May;94:107376. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2021.107376. Epub 2021 Feb 11.