Suppr超能文献

特发性膜性肾病患者不同治疗方法的疗效和成本:一项网络荟萃分析和成本效益分析。

Efficacy and cost of different treatment in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China.

Department of Quality Management, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325000, China.

出版信息

Int Immunopharmacol. 2021 May;94:107376. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2021.107376. Epub 2021 Feb 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) is the most common pathological type of adult nephrotic syndrome. However, the treatments for IMN patients had not been compared from the perspectives of therapeutic effect and pharmacoeconomics. Therefore, a network meta-analysis and a cost-effectiveness analysis were conducted to find the optimum treatment for IMN patients.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which compared the treatments including cyclophosphamide (CTX), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), cyclosporine (CsA), tacrolimus (TAC), leflunomide (LEF), chlorambucil (CLB) and rituximab (RTX) for patients with IMN were reviewed. The complete and partial remission rates were extracted and then compared by network meta-analysis. The surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) was calculated to rank the remission rate for all treatments. Then, the cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to compared the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of different treatments.

RESULTS

A total of 75 articles with 4806 participants were included according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Compared with the glucocorticoids (GC) group, CTX + GC (95%RR 1.02,1.76), CsA + GC (95%RR 1.11,2.13) and TAC + GC (95%RR 1.44,2.59) were associated with a significantly higher rate of complete remission. TAC + GC were most likely to be ranked the best (SUCRA of 92.1%). From the perspective of the cost-effectiveness analysis in China, the ICER of LEF + GC to CTX + GC was $30616.336 per unit utility, and that of TAC + GC to CTX + GC was $670475.210 per unit utility. And the ICER of CTX + GC to LEF + GC in the UK was $-65680.879 per unit utility.

CONCLUSIONS

CTX + GC was the cheapest treatment with obvious curative effect in China, while LEF + GC was a cost-effective alternative to CTX + GC. The remission rate of TAC + GC was highest despite the high single-dose cost.

摘要

背景

特发性膜性肾病(IMN)是成人肾病综合征中最常见的病理类型。然而,IMN 患者的治疗方法尚未从治疗效果和药物经济学的角度进行比较。因此,进行了一项网络荟萃分析和成本效益分析,以找到 IMN 患者的最佳治疗方法。

方法

综述了比较环磷酰胺(CTX)、霉酚酸酯(MMF)、环孢素(CsA)、他克莫司(TAC)、来氟米特(LEF)、苯丁酸氮芥(CLB)和利妥昔单抗(RTX)治疗 IMN 患者的随机对照试验(RCT)。提取完全缓解率和部分缓解率,并通过网络荟萃分析进行比较。计算累积排序概率曲线下面积(SUCRA)以对所有治疗方法的缓解率进行排序。然后,进行成本效益分析以比较不同治疗方法的增量成本效益比(ICER)。

结果

根据纳入和排除标准,共纳入 75 篇文章,共 4806 名参与者。与糖皮质激素(GC)组相比,CTX+GC(95%RR 1.02,1.76)、CsA+GC(95%RR 1.11,2.13)和 TAC+GC(95%RR 1.44,2.59)的完全缓解率更高。TAC+GC 最有可能被评为最佳治疗方法(SUCRA 为 92.1%)。从中国的成本效益分析角度来看,LEF+GC 相对于 CTX+GC 的增量成本效益比为每单位效用 30616.336 美元,TAC+GC 相对于 CTX+GC 的增量成本效益比为每单位效用 670475.210 美元。而在英国,CTX+GC 相对于 LEF+GC 的增量成本效益比为每单位效用-65680.879 美元。

结论

CTX+GC 是中国最便宜的有效治疗方法,而 LEF+GC 是 CTX+GC 的一种具有成本效益的替代方法。尽管单次剂量成本较高,但 TAC+GC 的缓解率最高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验