Department of Philosophy and History of Science, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Department of General Linguistics, Faculty of Philosophy, Palacký University in Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Theory Biosci. 2023 Nov;142(4):411-422. doi: 10.1007/s12064-023-00406-z. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
In our paper, we analyse the relationship of the evolutionary philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce to Lamarckian natural philosophy and link it to concepts of teleology, focusing especially on Aristotelian and Peircean conceptions of the final cause. Peirce commented on evolution in many of his writings, especially in 1891-1893 in essays such as 'Evolutionary Love' (1893) or 'Man's Glassy Essence' (1892). After introducing the three types of evolution distinguished by Peirce, we compare Peirce's and Lamarck's views on evolution, habit, and teleology. From a synthesis of concepts formulated by Peirce, Aristotle, nineteenth-century neo-Lamarckians, and current knowledge regarding epigenetics, there should emerge our own concept of biological teleology unburdened by panpsychism, subjective intentions, or determinism. We believe it could be a concept acceptable to current biology.
在我们的论文中,我们分析了查尔斯·桑德斯·皮尔士的进化哲学与拉马克自然哲学的关系,并将其与目的论概念联系起来,特别关注亚里士多德和皮尔士的最终原因概念。皮尔士在他的许多著作中都评论了进化,特别是在 1891-1893 年的论文中,如《进化之爱》(1893 年)或《人的玻璃本质》(1892 年)。在介绍了皮尔士区分的三种进化类型之后,我们比较了皮尔士和拉马克的进化、习惯和目的论观点。从皮尔士、亚里士多德、19 世纪新拉马克主义者和当前关于表观遗传学的概念综合来看,应该会出现我们自己的生物学目的论概念,不受泛心论、主观意图或决定论的影响。我们相信这可能是一个当前生物学可以接受的概念。