Chuang I-Ching, Chiau Hui-Yan, Liao Wan-Wen, Wu Yih-Ru, Chang Chih-Hung, Wu Ching-Yi
Department of Occupational Therapy and Graduate Institute of Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan.
Department of Neurology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan.
Digit Health. 2023 Sep 20;9:20552076231203633. doi: 10.1177/20552076231203633. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
Combined physical (PHY) and cognitive (COG) training in sequential (SEQ) and simultaneous (SIMUL) sessions may delay the progression of cognitive impairment. To date, no study has directly compared in older adults with cognitive impairment the effects of COG training, PHY training, SEQ motor-cognitive training and SIMUL motor-cognitve training on specific indices of cognitive performance and activities of daily living (ADL). The purpose of this study was to determine whether SEQ and SIMUL motor-cognitive training can improve treatment outcomes compared with PHY or COG training alone. We also aimed to compare the effects of SEQ versus SIMUL motor-cognitive training on cognitive functions and instrumental ADL (IADL) in older adults with cognitive impairment.
A cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted. Eighty older adults with cognitive impairment were randomly assigned to COG, PHY, SEQ or SIMUL training groups. The intervention consisted of 90-min training sessions, totaling 36 sessions. Outcome measures were the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, three subtests of the Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS) and the Lawton IADL scale.
Significant interaction effects between group and time were found in WMS-spatial span (= 0.04) and WMS-word lists (= 0.041). For WMS-spatial span, the SIMUL group showed outperformed the COG ( = 0.039), PHY ( = 0.010) and SEQ groups ( = 0.017). For WMS-word lists, the SEQ group improve more than COG ( = 0.013), PHY ( = 0.030) and SIMUL ( = 0.019) groups. No significant differences were found in IADL performance among four groups (= 0.645).
Our study showed SEQ and SIMUL motor-cognitive training led to more pronounced improvements in visuospatial working memory or verbal memory compared with isolated COG or PHY training for community-based older adults with cognitive impairment. For enhancing effects on IADL, we suggest the use of sensitive measurement tools and context-enriched cognitive training involving real-life task demands.
在连续(SEQ)和同时(SIMUL)训练课程中结合身体(PHY)和认知(COG)训练可能会延缓认知障碍的进展。迄今为止,尚无研究在患有认知障碍的老年人中直接比较COG训练、PHY训练、SEQ运动 - 认知训练和SIMUL运动 - 认知训练对认知表现和日常生活活动(ADL)特定指标的影响。本研究的目的是确定与单独的PHY或COG训练相比,SEQ和SIMUL运动 - 认知训练是否能改善治疗效果。我们还旨在比较SEQ与SIMUL运动 - 认知训练对患有认知障碍的老年人认知功能和工具性ADL(IADL)的影响。
进行了一项整群随机对照试验。80名患有认知障碍的老年人被随机分配到COG、PHY、SEQ或SIMUL训练组。干预包括90分钟的训练课程,共36节。结果测量指标为蒙特利尔认知评估、韦氏记忆量表(WMS)的三个子测试和洛顿IADL量表。
在WMS - 空间广度(= 0.04)和WMS - 单词列表(= 0.041)中发现了组与时间之间的显著交互作用。对于WMS - 空间广度,SIMUL组表现优于COG组(= 0.039)、PHY组(= 0.010)和SEQ组(= 0.017)。对于WMS - 单词列表,SEQ组的改善程度超过COG组(= 0.013)、PHY组(= 0.030)和SIMUL组(= 0.019)。四组在IADL表现方面未发现显著差异(= 0.645)。
我们的研究表明,对于社区中患有认知障碍的老年人,与单独的COG或PHY训练相比,SEQ和SIMUL运动 - 认知训练在视觉空间工作记忆或言语记忆方面带来了更显著的改善。为了增强对IADL的影响,我们建议使用敏感的测量工具以及涉及现实生活任务需求的情境丰富的认知训练。