Suppr超能文献

高渗葡萄糖注射疗法与传统物理疗法治疗膝骨关节炎患者的比较。

A comparison between hypertonic dextrose prolotherapy and conventional physiotherapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

作者信息

Yildiz Kamil Mursit, Guler Hayal, Ogut Halil, Yildizgoren Mustafa Turgut, Turhanoglu Ayse Dicle

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical School, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Antakya, Hatay, 31001, Turkey.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Konya City Hospital, Karatay, Konya 42020, Turkey.

出版信息

Med Int (Lond). 2023 Aug 29;3(5):45. doi: 10.3892/mi.2023.105. eCollection 2023 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of hypertonic dextrose prolotherapy (HDP) with conventional physiotherapy (CPT) in improving symptoms in females with knee osteoarthritis (OA). The present study included 60 patients with a diagnosis of knee OA. The patients were randomly assigned to the HDP (n=30) and CPT (n=30) groups. The patients in the HDP group were treated with a dextrose injection into the knee joint (25% dextrose) and around the knee (15% dextrose) in two sessions for 1 month, while those in the CPT group received a hot pack, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and therapeutic ultrasound in five sessions a week for 4 weeks. Prior to commencing the treatment, and at 1 and 3 months post-treatment, all the patients were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the goniometric measurement of active knee range of motion (ROM), a 50-m walking test and isokinetic knee muscle strength measurements. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups as regards the demographic characteristics at pre-treatment (P>0.05). However, at 1 and 3 months post-treatment, the scores of all the outcome parameters were significantly improved in the HDP group compared with the CPT group (P<0.05 for all). In both groups, a significant improvement was observed in the VAS scores, WOMAC total values and ROM following the treatments, with the greatest improvement observed in the HDP group (P<0.001). The isokinetic quadriceps peak torque measurements were increased in both groups following treatment. All the scores exhibited a statistically significant improvement in the HDP group at both 1 and 3 months post-treatment. On the whole, the results of the present study demonstrate that both HDP and CPT are effective treatment modalities to relieve pain, and increase functionality and strength in patients with knee OA. However, greater improvements in pain and functionality can be achieved with prolotherapy.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较高渗葡萄糖注射疗法(HDP)与传统物理疗法(CPT)在改善女性膝骨关节炎(OA)症状方面的疗效。本研究纳入了60例诊断为膝OA的患者。患者被随机分为HDP组(n = 30)和CPT组(n = 30)。HDP组患者接受膝关节内注射葡萄糖(25%葡萄糖)和膝关节周围注射(15%葡萄糖),分两个疗程,为期1个月,而CPT组患者接受热敷、经皮电刺激神经疗法和治疗性超声,每周进行5次,为期4周。在开始治疗前以及治疗后1个月和3个月,所有患者均使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)、主动膝关节活动范围(ROM)的角度测量、50米步行试验和等速膝关节肌肉力量测量进行评估。两组在治疗前人口统计学特征方面无统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。然而,在治疗后1个月和3个月,与CPT组相比,HDP组所有结局参数的评分均显著改善(所有P<0.05)。两组治疗后VAS评分、WOMAC总分值和ROM均有显著改善,HDP组改善最为明显(P<0.001)。两组治疗后等速股四头肌峰值扭矩测量值均增加。HDP组在治疗后1个月和3个月时所有评分均有统计学显著改善。总体而言,本研究结果表明,HDP和CPT都是缓解膝OA患者疼痛、增加功能和力量的有效治疗方式。然而,注射疗法在疼痛和功能改善方面效果更佳。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6168/10514571/ecb4983be294/mi-03-05-00105-g00.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验