Suppr超能文献

行动时刻:一种基于准则的方法,用于将公正、公平、多样性和包容性制度化。

Time to act: A rubric-based approach for institutionalizing justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion.

作者信息

Norman Marie K, Radomski Thomas R, Proulx Chelsea N, Rubio Doris M, Alston Tasha L, Mayowski Colleen A

机构信息

Institute for Clinical Research Education, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Jul 24;7(1):e172. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.599. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Attacks on minoritized communities and increasing awareness of the societal causes of health disparities have combined to highlight deep systemic inequities. In response, academic health centers have prioritized justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion (JEDI) in their strategic goals. To have a sustained impact, JEDI efforts cannot be siloed; rather, they must be woven into the fabric of our work and systematically assessed to promote meaningful outcomes and accountability. To this end, the University of Pittsburgh's Institute for Clinical Research Education assembled a task force to create and apply a rubric to identify short and long-term JEDI goals, assess the current state of JEDI at our Institute, and make recommendations for immediate action. To ensure deep buy-in, we gathered input from diverse members of our academic community, who served on targeted subcommittees. We then applied a three-step process to ensure rapid forward progress. We emerged with concrete actions for priority focus and a plan for ongoing assessment of JEDI institutionalization. We believe our process and rubric offer a scalable and adaptable model for other institutions and departments to follow as we work together across academic medical institutions to put our justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion goals into meaningful action.

摘要

对少数族裔社区的攻击以及对健康差距社会成因认识的不断提高,共同凸显了深层次的系统性不平等。作为回应,学术医疗中心已将公正、公平、多样性和包容性(JEDI)作为其战略目标的优先事项。为了产生持续影响,JEDI的努力不能孤立进行;相反,它们必须融入我们的工作结构,并进行系统评估,以促进有意义的成果和问责制。为此,匹兹堡大学临床研究教育学院组建了一个特别工作组,以创建并应用一个评分标准,来确定JEDI的短期和长期目标,评估我们学院JEDI的现状,并提出立即采取行动的建议。为确保广泛认可,我们收集了来自学术社区不同成员的意见,他们在有针对性的小组委员会中任职。然后,我们应用了一个三步流程,以确保迅速取得进展。我们得出了优先关注的具体行动以及JEDI制度化的持续评估计划。我们相信,在我们跨学术医疗机构共同努力将公正、公平、多样性和包容性目标转化为有意义的行动时,我们的流程和评分标准为其他机构和部门提供了一个可扩展且适应性强的模式以供遵循。

相似文献

8
Discussion of an approach to starting a JEDI inventory in a College of Pharmacy.探讨在药学院建立 JEDI 库存的方法。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2024 Apr;16(4):244-254. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2024.02.007. Epub 2024 Feb 29.

本文引用的文献

3
Gender-diverse teams produce more novel and higher-impact scientific ideas.性别多样化的团队能产生更多新颖且影响深远的科学理念。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Sep 6;119(36):e2200841119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2200841119. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
5
Shining a Light on Diversity in Team Science.照亮团队科学中的多样性
Crit Care Med. 2022 Apr 1;50(4):685-687. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005292.
6
Health Equity Tourism: Ravaging the Justice Landscape.健康公平旅游:破坏正义景观。
J Med Syst. 2022 Feb 12;46(3):17. doi: 10.1007/s10916-022-01803-5.
9
Opportunities and challenges in translational science.转化科学中的机遇与挑战。
Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Sep;14(5):1629-1647. doi: 10.1111/cts.13055. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
10
The Importance of Diversity and Inclusion in the Healthcare Workforce.医疗保健工作队伍中多样性和包容性的重要性。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2020 Jun;112(3):247-249. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2020.03.014. Epub 2020 Apr 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验