Comparison of Clinical and Radiological Findings for the Prediction of Scar Integrity in Women With Previous Lower Segment Cesarean Sections.

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to compare the clinical and radiological findings to predict scar integrity in term antenatal mothers with a previous lower segment cesarean section (LSCS).

METHODOLOGY

This prospective study was conducted in the obstetrics and gynecology department of LN Medical College, Bhopal, India, from August 2020 to August 2021. We included all pregnant women with term gestation (37+0 to 42+0 weeks) who were admitted either for elective repeat LSCS or for emergency LSCS and had a history of a previous LSCS. A detailed history and clinical examinations were performed. We noted the presence of scar tenderness and conducted transabdominal ultrasound (USG) to assess the integrity of the uterine scar in all women. During surgery, the surgeon identified the lower uterine segment scar and graded it as normal, thinned-out, dehiscent, or ruptured. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for both clinical findings (scar tenderness) and ultrasound findings as predictors of scar integrity.

RESULTS

A total of 60 pregnant women were included in the study. During a repeat cesarean section, we found a thinned-out scar in 26 women out of 60 (43.3%). Out of 60 women, 13 had scar tenderness, and among these 13 women, 12 had thinned-out scars intraoperatively. Forty-seven women had no scar tenderness; 14 had thinned-out scars intraoperatively. The sensitivity of scar tenderness as a predictor of a thinned-out scar was 46.2%, specificity was 97.1%, PPV was 92.3%, and NPV was 70.2%. Whereas the sensitivity of ultrasound scar thickness as a predictor of a thinned-out scar was only 19.2%, with a specificity of 94.1%, a PPV of 71.4%, and an NPV of 60.4%. Thus, we documented a significant correlation between intraoperative and clinical findings (κ = 0.46; p<0.05), but no agreement could be found between ultrasound and intraoperative findings (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically evident scar tenderness continues to be a useful parameter to predict intraoperative scar status.