Moserová J, Bĕhounková-Housková E
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;13(1):143-5. doi: 10.3109/02844317909013043.
The authors worked out a simple method, which enables an orientative evaluation of different skin substitutes as to their effectiveness in preventing gross evaporative water loss from decorticated dermis. The method is based on the loss of weight of decorticated dermis samples (covered by different materials) incubated in a thermostat for 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours at 37 degrees C. Following skin substitutes were tested: Lyofoam; Epigard; collagen foil; freeze dried amniotic membrane; freeze dried porcine xenografts; deep frozen porcine xenografts; and fresh porcine xenografts. Controls lost during 4 hours incubation at 37 degrees C 61.34% of the original weight (similarly as samples covered by synthetic skin substitutes or amniotic membrane). Samples covered by freeze dried xenografts lost only 33.07%, samples covered by deep frozen xenografts 13.20% and by fresh xenografts, 6.06%.
作者们研究出了一种简单的方法,该方法能够对不同的皮肤替代物在防止去皮质真皮大量水分蒸发方面的有效性进行定向评估。该方法基于在37摄氏度的恒温箱中孵育1、2、3和4小时的去皮质真皮样本(覆盖有不同材料)的重量损失。测试了以下皮肤替代物:冻干海绵;Epigard;胶原箔;冻干羊膜;冻干猪异种移植物;深冻猪异种移植物;以及新鲜猪异种移植物。对照组在37摄氏度下孵育4小时期间损失了原始重量的61.34%(与覆盖有合成皮肤替代物或羊膜的样本情况相同)。覆盖有冻干异种移植物的样本仅损失了33.07%,覆盖有深冻异种移植物的样本损失了13.20%,而覆盖有新鲜异种移植物的样本损失了6.06%。