Department of Psychology, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Nov;153(11):2729-2741. doi: 10.1037/xge0001472. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
The increasing ethnic and cultural diversity of contemporary societies has raised the importance of integration policies for people with a migrant background. Tools like the Migrant Integration Policy Index have been developed to evaluate different countries' integration approaches. If, on the one hand, focusing on what governments are doing to promote integration is necessary, on the other hand, it is of utmost importance to consider individuals' attitudes toward these policies. Study 1: A pilot study with 356 adolescents (41.1% female, 58.9% male; = 15.38) and 200 adults (69% female, 31% male; = 47.43) was conducted to test the psychometric proprieties of the Attitudes Toward Migrant Integration Policies scale. Study 2: A total of 1,156 adolescents (51.6% female, 48.4% male; = 15.69), 1,288 parents (56.9% mothers, 43.1% fathers; = 49.39), and 284 teachers (68.3% female, 31.7% male; = 45.55) were involved in a study to evaluate how attitudes toward integration policies differ within generations (e.g., ethnic majority and minority groups), within families (e.g., adolescents vs. their fathers), and across generational groups (i.e., adolescents, parents, and teachers). Latent mean comparisons indicated that attitudes toward integration policies varied significantly across sex (for adolescents and parents), ethnic background (parents only), and school track (adolescents) groups. Regarding differences within family dyads, adolescents reported more positive attitudes toward integration policies than their fathers and mothers. Finally, teachers showed more positive attitudes compared to adolescents and their parents. Overall, this study highlights nuanced intergenerational differences, with adolescents standing in between the different positions of their parents and teachers. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
当代社会的民族和文化多样性不断增加,使得移民背景人群的融合政策变得更加重要。为此,人们开发了移民融合政策指数等工具,以评估不同国家的融合方法。一方面,关注政府为促进融合所做的努力是必要的;另一方面,考虑个人对这些政策的态度也至关重要。研究 1:对 356 名青少年(41.1%为女性,58.9%为男性; = 15.38)和 200 名成年人(69%为女性,31%为男性; = 47.43)进行了一项初步研究,以检验移民融合政策态度量表的心理测量特性。研究 2:共有 1156 名青少年(51.6%为女性,48.4%为男性; = 15.69)、1288 名家长(56.9%为母亲,43.1%为父亲; = 49.39)和 284 名教师(68.3%为女性,31.7%为男性; = 45.55)参与了一项研究,以评估融合政策的态度在代际(例如,多数族裔和少数族裔群体)、家庭内部(例如,青少年与他们的父亲)和跨代群体(即青少年、家长和教师)之间的差异。潜在均值比较表明,融合政策的态度在性别(青少年和家长)、族裔背景(家长)和学校轨道(青少年)群体之间存在显著差异。关于家庭内的差异,青少年对融合政策的态度比他们的父亲和母亲更积极。最后,教师的态度比青少年和他们的父母更积极。总的来说,这项研究强调了代际差异的细微差别,青少年处于父母和教师不同立场之间。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2024 APA,保留所有权利)。