Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
J Neuroinflammation. 2023 Sep 25;20(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12974-023-02895-7.
Studies of microglial gene manipulation in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease (AD) amyloidopathy can cause unpredictable effects on various key endpoints, including amyloidosis, inflammation, neuritic dystrophy, neurodegeneration, and learning behavior. In this Correspondence, we discuss three examples, microRNA 155 (miR155), TREM2, and INPP5D, in which observed results have been difficult to reconcile with predicted results based on precedent, because these six key endpoints do not reliably track together. The pathogenesis of AD involves multiple cell types and complex events that may change with disease stage. We propose that cell-type targeting and timing of intervention are responsible for the sometimes impossibility of predicting whether any prospective therapeutic intervention should aim at increasing or decreasing the level or activity of a particular molecular target.
阿尔茨海默病(AD)淀粉样变的小鼠模型中对小胶质细胞基因操作的研究可能会对各种关键终点产生不可预测的影响,包括淀粉样变性、炎症、神经突营养不良、神经退行性变和学习行为。在这篇通讯中,我们讨论了三个例子,即 microRNA 155(miR155)、TREM2 和 INPP5D,观察到的结果很难与基于先例的预测结果相协调,因为这六个关键终点并不可靠地一起跟踪。AD 的发病机制涉及多种细胞类型和复杂事件,这些事件可能会随着疾病阶段的变化而变化。我们提出,细胞类型靶向和干预时机是决定某些预期治疗干预措施是否应该旨在增加或减少特定分子靶标水平或活性的有时不可能的原因。