• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

教育性行星餐盘图形对斯坦福大学食堂肉类消费的影响:一项随机对照试验。

Effects of an educational planetary plate graphic on meat consumption in a Stanford University dining hall: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Marcone Alessandra L, Darmstadt Gary L, Challamel Ghislaine Amsler, Mathur Maya B, Gardner Christopher D

机构信息

Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.

Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.

出版信息

BMC Nutr. 2023 Sep 25;9(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s40795-023-00764-3.

DOI:10.1186/s40795-023-00764-3
PMID:37749609
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10518909/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Assess the impact of an educational Planetary Health Plate (PHP) graphic on meat-related dietary choices of Stanford University dining hall patrons using a randomized controlled trial crossover design. All patrons entering the dining hall during study periods were enrolled as participants. Control, n = 631; PHP, n = 547.

METHODS

Compare dietary behavior without signage to behavior while exposed to PHP during four equivalent dinner meals. The primary outcome was total meat-dish weight adjusted for the number of people entering the dining hall. Secondary outcomes included the number of meat-dish servings and average meat-dish serving weight. Analysis using T-tests, Poisson generalized linear model.

RESULTS

Differences in total meat-dish weight, (1.54 kg; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] = -4.41,1.33; P = .19) and average meat-dish serving weight (0.03 kg; 95% CI = 0.00, 0.06; P = .07) between PHP and control patrons did not reach significance. The rate at which PHP patrons took meat was significantly lower (Incidence Rate Ratio 0.80; 95% CI = 0.71, 0.91; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Exposure to an educational plate graphic decreased the proportion of patrons taking meat but had no impact on total meat consumption or meat-dish serving weight. Statistical methods used in this study may inform future investigations on dietary change in the dining hall setting. Further research on the role of educational signage in influencing dietary behavior is warranted, with an aim to improve human health and environmental sustainability.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05565859, registered 4 October 2022.

摘要

背景

采用随机对照试验交叉设计,评估教育性的行星健康餐盘(PHP)图形对斯坦福大学食堂顾客与肉类相关的饮食选择的影响。在研究期间进入食堂的所有顾客均被纳入为参与者。对照组,n = 631;PHP组,n = 547。

方法

比较在四顿等量晚餐中,无标识时的饮食行为与接触PHP时的饮食行为。主要结局是根据进入食堂的人数调整后的肉类菜肴总重量。次要结局包括肉类菜肴的份数和平均肉类菜肴份量。使用t检验、泊松广义线性模型进行分析。

结果

PHP组和对照组顾客之间,肉类菜肴总重量的差异(1.54千克;95%置信区间[CI]= -4.41,1.33;P = 0.19)和平均肉类菜肴份量的差异(0.03千克;95% CI = 0.00, 0.06;P = 0.07)均未达到显著水平。PHP组顾客选择肉类的比率显著更低(发病率比0.80;95% CI = 0.71, 0.91;P < 0.001)。

结论

接触教育性餐盘图形降低了选择肉类的顾客比例,但对肉类总消费量或肉类菜肴份量没有影响。本研究中使用的统计方法可能为未来食堂环境中饮食变化的调查提供参考。有必要进一步研究教育标识在影响饮食行为中的作用,以改善人类健康和环境可持续性。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT05565859,于2022年10月4日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9a1/10518909/57f3510f6b39/40795_2023_764_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9a1/10518909/b72a1843e7c0/40795_2023_764_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9a1/10518909/b89029cdd835/40795_2023_764_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9a1/10518909/57f3510f6b39/40795_2023_764_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9a1/10518909/b72a1843e7c0/40795_2023_764_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9a1/10518909/b89029cdd835/40795_2023_764_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9a1/10518909/57f3510f6b39/40795_2023_764_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of an educational planetary plate graphic on meat consumption in a Stanford University dining hall: a randomized controlled trial.教育性行星餐盘图形对斯坦福大学食堂肉类消费的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Nutr. 2023 Sep 25;9(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s40795-023-00764-3.
2
Impact of trayless dining intervention on food choices of university students.无托盘用餐干预对大学生食物选择的影响。
Arch Public Health. 2018 Sep 24;76:61. doi: 10.1186/s13690-018-0301-5. eCollection 2018.
3
Using nutrition labeling as a potential tool for changing eating habits of university dining hall patrons.将营养标签作为改变大学食堂顾客饮食习惯的潜在工具。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2008 Dec;108(12):2071-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.09.009.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Developing a digital photography-based method for dietary analysis in self-serve dining settings.开发一种基于数码摄影的自助餐饮环境下饮食分析方法。
Appetite. 2017 Jul 1;114:217-225. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.03.050. Epub 2017 Apr 2.
6
Single-Meal Nutrient Assessment by a Self-Administered, Electronic Exit Survey Compared with a Multipass Dietary Interview in University Undergraduates in an All-You-Care-to-Eat Campus Dining Hall.在一个提供任意份量的校园自助餐厅中,通过自我管理的电子出口调查与多阶段饮食访谈对大学生进行单餐营养素评估。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 May;119(5):739-749. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2019.01.020.
7
Nudging healthy college dining hall choices using behavioral economics.运用行为经济学推动健康的大学食堂选择。
J Am Coll Health. 2021 Oct;69(7):697-703. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2019.1705842. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
8
Olfactory Cues of Restaurant Wait Staff Modulate Patrons' Dining Experiences and Behavior.餐厅服务员的嗅觉线索会调节顾客的用餐体验和行为。
Foods. 2019 Nov 26;8(12):619. doi: 10.3390/foods8120619.
9
Testing a Beverage and Fruit/Vegetable Education Intervention in a University Dining Hall.在大学食堂测试一项饮料及水果/蔬菜教育干预措施。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2017 Jun;49(6):457-465.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
10
Replacing meat with alternative plant-based products (RE-MAPs): protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a behavioural intervention to reduce meat consumption.用替代植物性产品代替肉类(RE-MAPs):一项减少肉类消费的行为干预随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 1;9(5):e027016. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027016.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of a portion-size default nudge on meat consumption and diner satisfaction: controlled experiments in Stanford University dining halls.一份量默认助推对肉类消费和用餐者满意度的影响:斯坦福大学食堂的对照实验。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 16;25(1):1434. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22495-9.
2
Measuring and shaping the nutritional environment via food sales logs: case studies of campus-wide food choice and a call to action.通过食品销售记录衡量和塑造营养环境:校园食品选择的案例研究及行动呼吁。
Front Nutr. 2024 Jun 4;11:1231070. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1231070. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Interventions to reduce meat consumption by appealing to animal welfare: Meta-analysis and evidence-based recommendations.呼吁关注动物福利以减少肉类消费的干预措施:荟萃分析和循证建议。
Appetite. 2021 Sep 1;164:105277. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105277. Epub 2021 May 11.
2
Non-nutrients and nutrients from Latin American fruits for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases.来自拉丁美洲水果的非营养物和营养素可预防心血管疾病。
Food Res Int. 2021 Jan;139:109844. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109844. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
3
Multiple health and environmental impacts of foods.
食物对健康和环境的多重影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Nov 12;116(46):23357-23362. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1906908116. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
4
Can Diets Be Healthy, Sustainable, and Equitable?饮食能否既健康又可持续且公平?
Curr Obes Rep. 2019 Dec;8(4):495-503. doi: 10.1007/s13679-019-00362-0.
5
Increasing Vegetable Intake by Emphasizing Tasty and Enjoyable Attributes: A Randomized Controlled Multisite Intervention for Taste-Focused Labeling.强调美味和享受属性来增加蔬菜摄入量:以口味为重点的标签的随机对照多点干预。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Nov;30(11):1603-1615. doi: 10.1177/0956797619872191. Epub 2019 Oct 2.
6
Vitamin D supplementation and musculoskeletal health.维生素D补充与肌肉骨骼健康。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019 Feb;7(2):85. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30347-4.
7
Restructuring physical micro-environments to reduce the demand for meat: a systematic review and qualitative comparative analysis.重构物理微环境以减少对肉类的需求:系统评价和定性比较分析。
Lancet Planet Health. 2018 Sep;2(9):e384-e397. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30188-8.
8
Meat consumption, health, and the environment.肉类消费、健康与环境。
Science. 2018 Jul 20;361(6399). doi: 10.1126/science.aam5324.
9
Consumer Decision-Making Based on Review Websites: Are There Differences Between Choosing a Hotel and Choosing a Physician?基于点评网站的消费者决策:选择酒店和选择医生之间存在差异吗?
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jun 16;18(6):e129. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5580.
10
Perception of academic examination stress: effects on serum leptin, cortisol, appetite and performance.对学术考试压力的感知:对血清瘦素、皮质醇、食欲及表现的影响。
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2011 Apr-Jun;23(2):97-9.