Department of Medicine, MetroWest Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Framingham, MA, USA.
Department of Immunology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Feb;64(2):164-177. doi: 10.1002/jcph.2358. Epub 2023 Oct 15.
Macrolides and tetracyclines are antibiotics that have a range of anti-inflammatory properties beyond their microbial capabilities. Although these antibiotics have been in widespread use, the long-term safety profiles are limited. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials that compared macrolides or tetracyclines with placeboes to provide long-term safety information. We searched Medline and EMBASE from inception to October 2022 and identified studies that reported study drug-related death, serious adverse events (SAEs), or withdrawal rates, and common adverse effects of each drug. Relative risk (RR) and number needed to harm were calculated. Of the 52 randomized clinical trials included, there are 3151 participants on doxycycline, 2519 participants on minocycline, 3049 participants on azithromycin, 763 participants on clarithromycin, 262 participants on erythromycin, and 100 participants on roxithromycin. There was no death related to any study drugs and rates of SAE were not significantly different from placebo in any drug. Overall withdrawal rates were slightly higher than placebo in doxycycline (RR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.12-1.52) and minocycline (RR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.15-1.46). Withdrawal rates due to adverse events were higher in doxycycline (RR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.88-4.22), minocycline (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.09-1.98), and azithromycin (RR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.13-2.08). Gastrointestinal disturbances are the most common tolerable adverse effects for every drug. Photosensitivity and rash are the second most common adverse effects for doxycycline and minocycline. We found no evidence that long-term use up to 2 years of macrolides or tetracyclines was associated with increased risk of SAEs.
大环内酯类和四环素类抗生素除了具有抗菌作用外,还具有广泛的抗炎特性。尽管这些抗生素已被广泛应用,但长期安全性数据有限。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,比较了大环内酯类或四环素类药物与安慰剂治疗的随机临床试验,以提供长期安全性信息。我们检索了 Medline 和 EMBASE 从成立到 2022 年 10 月,确定了报告研究药物相关死亡、严重不良事件(SAE)或停药率以及每种药物常见不良反应的研究。计算了相对风险(RR)和需要治疗的人数。在纳入的 52 项随机临床试验中,有 3151 名参与者接受多西环素治疗,2519 名参与者接受米诺环素治疗,3049 名参与者接受阿奇霉素治疗,763 名参与者接受克拉霉素治疗,262 名参与者接受红霉素治疗,100 名参与者接受罗红霉素治疗。没有任何研究药物相关的死亡,任何药物的 SAE 发生率与安慰剂相比均无显著差异。总体停药率略高于安慰剂的多西环素(RR,1.30;95%CI,1.12-1.52)和米诺环素(RR,1.29;95%CI,1.15-1.46)。由于不良反应导致的停药率在多西环素(RR,2.82;95%CI,1.88-4.22)、米诺环素(RR,1.48;95%CI,1.09-1.98)和阿奇霉素(RR,1.53;95%CI,1.13-2.08)中更高。胃肠道紊乱是每种药物最常见的可耐受不良反应。光过敏和皮疹是多西环素和米诺环素的第二常见不良反应。我们没有发现长期使用(长达 2 年)大环内酯类或四环素类药物与 SAE 风险增加相关的证据。