• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

需要大量患者来获得新癌症药物的额外批准:一项回顾性队列研究。

Large numbers of patients are needed to obtain additional approvals for new cancer drugs: A retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Equity, Ethics and Policy, McGill University School of Population and Global Health, 2001 McGill College Avenue, Montreal, QC, H3A 1G1, Canada.

CARE Advocates Network, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 26;13(1):16138. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42213-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-42213-y
PMID:37752147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10522579/
Abstract

Patients endure risk and uncertainty when they participate in clinical trials. We previously estimated that 12,217 patient-participants are required to bring a new cancer drug to market. However, many development efforts are aimed at extending the label of already approved drugs. Herein, we estimate the number of patients required to extend the indication of an FDA approved cancer drug. We identified all anti-cancer drugs approved by the FDA 2012 to 2015. We searched clinicaltrials.gov to identify all drug development trajectories (i.e., a series of one or more clinical trials testing a unique drug-indication pairing) launched after FDA approval for each drug. We identified which trajectories produced the following milestones: secondary FDA approvals, secondary FDA approvals achieving substantial clinical benefit in ESMO-MCBS, and recommendations in NCCN clinical practice guidelines. Using the total enrollment, we estimated the number of patients needed to reach each milestone. Forty-two drugs were approved by the FDA between 2012 and 2015, leading to 451 post-approval trajectories enrolling 129,548 patients. Fourteen secondary FDA approvals were identified, of which 4 met the ESMO-MCBS definition of substantial clinical benefit. Fourteen NCCN off-label recommendations were obtained. A total of 9253, 32,387 and 4627 patients were needed to attain an FDA approval, an approval with substantial clinical benefit on ESMO-MCBS, and an NCCN guideline recommendation, respectively. The number of patients needed to obtain a first secondary FDA approval was 16,596. Large numbers of patients are needed to extend the label of prior FDA approved drugs. Label extension after approval entails lower marginal costs for developers. However, extra knowledge available to researchers about a drug's safety and pharmacology after FDA approval does not appear to translate into reduced patient numbers required for developing new cancer applications.

摘要

患者在参与临床试验时会承受风险和不确定性。我们之前估计,需要 12217 名患者参与才能将一种新的癌症药物推向市场。然而,许多研发工作的目标是扩大已批准药物的标签。在此,我们估计扩大 FDA 批准的癌症药物适应证所需的患者数量。我们确定了 2012 年至 2015 年期间 FDA 批准的所有抗癌药物。我们在 clinicaltrials.gov 上搜索了所有在 FDA 批准后启动的药物开发轨迹(即一系列测试独特药物-适应证配对的一个或多个临床试验)。我们确定了哪些轨迹产生了以下里程碑:FDA 的二次批准、在 ESMO-MCBS 中具有实质性临床获益的 FDA 二次批准,以及 NCCN 临床实践指南中的建议。我们使用总入组人数估计达到每个里程碑所需的患者数量。2012 年至 2015 年间,FDA 批准了 42 种药物,随后批准了 451 个后续批准的治疗方案,共招募了 129548 名患者。确定了 14 项 FDA 的二次批准,其中 4 项符合 ESMO-MCBS 对实质性临床获益的定义。获得了 14 项 NCCN 标签外推荐。分别需要 9253、32387 和 4627 名患者才能获得 FDA 批准、具有 ESMO-MCBS 实质性临床获益的批准和 NCCN 指南建议。获得首次 FDA 二次批准所需的患者人数为 16596 名。需要大量患者来扩大之前 FDA 批准药物的标签。批准后扩大标签对开发者来说意味着边际成本较低。然而,FDA 批准后,研究人员对药物安全性和药理学的了解似乎并没有转化为开发新癌症应用所需的患者数量减少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2d8/10522579/30669bbf6df1/41598_2023_42213_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2d8/10522579/30669bbf6df1/41598_2023_42213_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2d8/10522579/30669bbf6df1/41598_2023_42213_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Large numbers of patients are needed to obtain additional approvals for new cancer drugs: A retrospective cohort study.需要大量患者来获得新癌症药物的额外批准:一项回顾性队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 26;13(1):16138. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42213-y.
2
Diminishing clinical impact for post-approval cancer clinical trials: A retrospective cohort study.上市后癌症临床试验临床影响减弱:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 12;17(9):e0274115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274115. eCollection 2022.
3
Patient burden and clinical advances associated with postapproval monotherapy cancer drug trials: a retrospective cohort study.与批准后单药癌症药物试验相关的患者负担和临床进展:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 17;10(2):e034306. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034306.
4
Cancer Drug Approvals That Displaced Existing Standard-of-Care Therapies, 2016-2021.2016-2021 年取代现有标准治疗药物的癌症治疗药物批准情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e222265. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.2265.
5
An estimate of rate of deviation from NCCN guideline recommendations for central nervous system imaging in trials forming basis for drug approval in first line advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).评估临床试验中中枢神经系统成像偏离 NCCN 指南建议的比率,这些临床试验构成了一线晚期非小细胞肺癌 (NSCLC) 药物批准的基础。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Jan 16;22(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09179-y.
6
Clinical benefit, price and approval characteristics of FDA-approved new drugs for treating advanced solid cancer, 2000-2015.2000-2015 年美国食品和药物管理局批准治疗晚期实体瘤新药的临床获益、价格和审批特点。
Ann Oncol. 2017 May 1;28(5):1111-1116. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx053.
7
Clinical benefit and cost of breakthrough cancer drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.美国食品和药物管理局批准的突破性癌症药物的临床获益和成本。
Cancer. 2020 Oct 1;126(19):4390-4399. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33095. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
8
Clinical Value of Molecular Targets and FDA-Approved Genome-Targeted Cancer Therapies.分子靶点的临床价值和美国食品药品监督管理局批准的基于基因组的癌症治疗药物。
JAMA Oncol. 2024 May 1;10(5):634-641. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0194.
9
Patient Participation in Clinical Trials of Oncology Drugs and Biologics Preceding Approval by the US Food and Drug Administration.患者参与美国食品和药物管理局批准前肿瘤药物和生物制剂的临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2110456. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10456.
10
Approval of Cancer Drugs With Uncertain Therapeutic Value: A Comparison of Regulatory Decisions in Europe and the United States.具有不确定治疗价值的癌症药物的批准:欧洲和美国的监管决策比较。
Milbank Q. 2020 Dec;98(4):1219-1256. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12476. Epub 2020 Oct 6.

引用本文的文献

1
New cancer medicines in Europe 2010-2020: comparison of medicines with or without extensions of indications.2010-2020 年欧洲的新型癌症药物:有或无适应症扩展的药物比较。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 21;14(10):e083549. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083549.

本文引用的文献

1
Diminishing clinical impact for post-approval cancer clinical trials: A retrospective cohort study.上市后癌症临床试验临床影响减弱:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 12;17(9):e0274115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274115. eCollection 2022.
2
The Human Cost: Patient Contribution to Clinical Trials in Neurology.人类的代价:神经病学临床试验中的患者贡献。
Neurotherapeutics. 2022 Sep;19(5):1503-1506. doi: 10.1007/s13311-022-01292-x. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
3
Quantifying Patient Investment in Novel Neurological Drug Development.量化患者在新型神经药物研发中的投入。
Neurotherapeutics. 2022 Sep;19(5):1507-1513. doi: 10.1007/s13311-022-01259-y. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
4
Patient Participation in Clinical Trials of Oncology Drugs and Biologics Preceding Approval by the US Food and Drug Administration.患者参与美国食品和药物管理局批准前肿瘤药物和生物制剂的临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2110456. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10456.
5
Estimated Research and Development Investment Needed to Bring a New Medicine to Market, 2009-2018.2009-2018 年新药推向市场所需的研发投资估算。
JAMA. 2020 Mar 3;323(9):844-853. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1166.
6
Patient burden and clinical advances associated with postapproval monotherapy cancer drug trials: a retrospective cohort study.与批准后单药癌症药物试验相关的患者负担和临床进展:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 17;10(2):e034306. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034306.
7
Assessment of the Clinical Benefit of Cancer Drugs Receiving Accelerated Approval.加速批准的癌症药物的临床获益评估。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Jul 1;179(7):906-913. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0462.
8
ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 1.1.ESMO-临床获益量表 1.1 版
Ann Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;28(10):2340-2366. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx310.
9
Post-marketing research and its outcome for novel anticancer agents approved by both the FDA and EMA between 2005 and 2010: A cross-sectional study.2005年至2010年间获美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)和欧洲药品管理局(EMA)批准的新型抗癌药物的上市后研究及其结果:一项横断面研究。
Int J Cancer. 2018 Jan 15;142(2):414-423. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31061. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
10
Biotech R&D spend jumps by more than 15.生物技术研发支出跃升超过15% 。 (原英文表述似乎不完整,推测补充完整后是这样的意思,你可根据实际情况调整)
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016 Jun 30;15(7):447. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2016.135.