• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2010-2020 年欧洲的新型癌症药物:有或无适应症扩展的药物比较。

New cancer medicines in Europe 2010-2020: comparison of medicines with or without extensions of indications.

机构信息

Research at Kela, The Social Insurance Institution of Finland (Kela), Helsinki, Finland.

School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 21;14(10):e083549. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083549.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083549
PMID:39433409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11499751/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

During the last decade, extensions of therapeutic indications have been one of the most common methods to extend the lifecycle of a medical product in the post-authorisation phase and to increase the use and sales of medicines. The aim of this study was to gain understanding of the lifecycle of cancer medicines and especially the role and level of evidence extensions in comparison to first indications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified all new outpatient cancer medicines approved by the European Medicines Agency between 2010 and 2020 and the extensions to their indications. We compared general study design characteristics from the European public assessment reports using critical appraisal tools and clinical added value assessments.

RESULTS

We identified altogether 55 new outpatient cancer medicines, 31 of which had one or more extension(s) of indication and 24 had no extension of indication. In total, there were 57 extensions. The most common extension of indication was a change in the treatment line (35%). Compared with first indications, the overall quality of studies supporting extensions was better in terms of study designs. The proportion of medicines providing CAV was higher in extensions compared with first indication of medicines with and without extensions.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on different assessments and perspectives, we found that extensions of indications are a very common and important part of extending the lifecycle of outpatient cancer medicines in Europe. Our findings also suggest that the clinical value of cancer medicines increases with extensions.

摘要

简介

在过去十年中,扩大治疗适应症一直是延长医疗产品上市后生命周期和增加药品使用和销售的最常见方法之一。本研究旨在了解癌症药物的生命周期,特别是适应症扩展的作用和证据水平,与首次适应症相比。

材料与方法

我们确定了 2010 年至 2020 年间欧洲药品管理局批准的所有新的门诊癌症药物及其适应症的扩展。我们使用关键评估工具和临床附加值评估,比较了欧洲公共评估报告中的一般研究设计特征。

结果

我们总共确定了 55 种新的门诊癌症药物,其中 31 种有一个或多个适应症扩展,24 种没有适应症扩展。共有 57 个扩展。最常见的适应症扩展是治疗线的变化(35%)。与首次适应症相比,支持扩展的研究在研究设计方面的整体质量更好。与无扩展的药品相比,提供 CAV 的药品比例在扩展中更高。

结论

基于不同的评估和观点,我们发现适应症的扩展是延长欧洲门诊癌症药物生命周期的非常常见和重要的部分。我们的研究结果还表明,癌症药物的临床价值随着适应症的扩展而增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/577c/11499751/26ce53ee0232/bmjopen-14-10-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/577c/11499751/29e701c0cc36/bmjopen-14-10-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/577c/11499751/3ed2066794b5/bmjopen-14-10-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/577c/11499751/436410d40222/bmjopen-14-10-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/577c/11499751/26ce53ee0232/bmjopen-14-10-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/577c/11499751/29e701c0cc36/bmjopen-14-10-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/577c/11499751/3ed2066794b5/bmjopen-14-10-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/577c/11499751/436410d40222/bmjopen-14-10-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/577c/11499751/26ce53ee0232/bmjopen-14-10-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
New cancer medicines in Europe 2010-2020: comparison of medicines with or without extensions of indications.2010-2020 年欧洲的新型癌症药物:有或无适应症扩展的药物比较。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 21;14(10):e083549. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083549.
2
Therapeutic indications in oncology: emerging features and regulatory dynamics.肿瘤学治疗适应证:新出现的特征和监管动态。
Eur J Cancer. 2010 Feb;46(3):471-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.11.021. Epub 2009 Dec 26.
3
Availability of evidence of benefits on overall survival and quality of life of cancer drugs approved by European Medicines Agency: retrospective cohort study of drug approvals 2009-13.欧洲药品管理局批准的癌症药物对总生存期和生活质量有益的证据可得性:2009 - 2013年药物批准情况的回顾性队列研究
BMJ. 2017 Oct 4;359:j4530. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4530.
4
Approval of Cancer Drugs With Uncertain Therapeutic Value: A Comparison of Regulatory Decisions in Europe and the United States.具有不确定治疗价值的癌症药物的批准:欧洲和美国的监管决策比较。
Milbank Q. 2020 Dec;98(4):1219-1256. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12476. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
5
Pre-approval and post-approval availability of evidence and clinical benefit of conditionally approved cancer drugs in Europe: A comparison with standard approved cancer drugs.在欧洲,有条件批准的癌症药物的证据和临床获益的审批前和审批后可及性:与标准批准的癌症药物的比较。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 May;88(5):2169-2179. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15141. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
6
Uncertainties about the benefit-risk balance of oncology medicines assessed by the European Medicines Agency.欧洲药品管理局评估的肿瘤药物效益风险平衡的不确定性。
ESMO Open. 2024 Dec;9(12):103991. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103991. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
7
Therapeutic value of first versus supplemental indications of drugs in US and Europe (2011-20): retrospective cohort study.美国和欧洲(2011-20 年)药物一线与二线适应证的治疗价值:回顾性队列研究。
BMJ. 2023 Jul 5;382:e074166. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-074166.
8
A Qualitative Study on the Differences Between Trial Populations and the Approved Therapeutic Indications of Antineoplastic Agents by 3 Regulatory Agencies From 2010 to 2018.一项关于 2010 年至 2018 年间 3 个监管机构的抗肿瘤药物试验人群与批准治疗适应证之间差异的定性研究。
Clin Ther. 2020 Feb;42(2):305-320.e0. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
9
Twelve years of European cancer drug approval-a systematic investigation of the 'magnitude of clinical benefit'.十二年欧洲抗癌药物审批-对“临床获益幅度”的系统调查
ESMO Open. 2021 Jun;6(3):100166. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100166. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
10
Extensions of indication throughout the drug product lifecycle: a quantitative analysis.药品全生命周期适应症扩展:定量分析
Drug Discov Today. 2016 Feb;21(2):348-55. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2015.11.009. Epub 2015 Dec 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Primary endpoint acceptance and its association with benefit ratings and market access in German health technology assessments: a retrospective cohort study.德国卫生技术评估中主要终点的接受情况及其与效益评级和市场准入的关联:一项回顾性队列研究
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 Jul 17;55:101382. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101382. eCollection 2025 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Partial Orphan Cancer Drugs: US Food and Drug Administration Approval, Clinical Benefit, Trials, Epidemiology, Price, Beneficiaries, and Spending.部分孤儿癌药物:美国食品和药物管理局批准、临床获益、临床试验、流行病学、价格、受益人群和支出。
Value Health. 2024 Apr;27(4):449-457. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.01.002. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
2
Large numbers of patients are needed to obtain additional approvals for new cancer drugs: A retrospective cohort study.需要大量患者来获得新癌症药物的额外批准:一项回顾性队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 26;13(1):16138. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42213-y.
3
Healthcare Payer Perspectives on the Assessment and Pricing of Oncology Multi-Indication Products: Evidence from Nine OECD Countries.
医疗保健支付方对肿瘤多适应症产品评估与定价的观点:来自九个经合组织国家的证据
Pharmacoecon Open. 2023 Jul;7(4):553-565. doi: 10.1007/s41669-023-00406-1. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
4
Rapid access to innovative medicinal products while ensuring relevant health technology assessment. Position of the French National Authority for Health.在确保进行相关卫生技术评估的同时,快速获取创新药品。法国国家卫生管理局的立场。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Jan 19;29(1):1-5. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112091.
5
Launch sequencing of pharmaceuticals with multiple therapeutic indications: evidence from seven countries.多治疗适应症药品的上市序贯:来自七个国家的证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 13;23(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09095-2.
6
Assessing the risk of bias of quantitative analytical studies: introducing the vision for critical appraisal within JBI systematic reviews.评估定量分析研究的偏倚风险:引入 JBI 系统评价中批判性评价的视野。
JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Mar 1;21(3):467-471. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00224.
7
Value and Price of Multi-indication Cancer Drugs in the USA, Germany, France, England, Canada, Australia, and Scotland.美国、德国、法国、英国、加拿大、澳大利亚和苏格兰的多适应症癌症药物的价值和价格。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2022 Sep;20(5):757-768. doi: 10.1007/s40258-022-00737-w. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
8
Initial and supplementary indication approval of new targeted cancer drugs by the FDA, EMA, Health Canada, and TGA.美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)、欧洲药品管理局(EMA)、加拿大卫生部(Health Canada)和澳大利亚治疗用品管理局(TGA)对新型靶向抗癌药物的初始和补充适应证批准。
Invest New Drugs. 2022 Aug;40(4):798-809. doi: 10.1007/s10637-022-01227-5. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
9
Oncologic Drugs Approval in Europe for Solid Tumors: Overview of the Last 6 Years.欧洲实体瘤肿瘤药物批准情况:过去6年概述
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 11;14(4):889. doi: 10.3390/cancers14040889.
10
Extension of Indication for Authorised Oncology Products in the European Union: A Joint Effort of Multiple Stakeholders.欧盟授权肿瘤产品适应症的扩展:多方利益相关者的共同努力
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Dec 9;8:790782. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.790782. eCollection 2021.