• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊髓能力尺(SCAR)的最小临床重要差异(MCID)和最小可检测变化(MDC)。

Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and minimal detectable change (MDC) of Spinal Cord Ability Ruler (SCAR).

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Department of Family Medicine and Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Clinical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

出版信息

Spinal Cord. 2023 Dec;61(12):652-657. doi: 10.1038/s41393-023-00934-x. Epub 2023 Sep 26.

DOI:10.1038/s41393-023-00934-x
PMID:37752176
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

To find minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and minimal detectable change (MDC) of Spinal Cord Ability Ruler (SCAR) in Thai participants with spinal cord injury (SCI).

SETTING

Rehabilitation ward at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital.

METHODS

Data of individuals with SCI who were not diagnosed with central cord syndrome and were admitted for the first time for rehabilitation were analyzed. Upper extremities motor score, self-care and mobility items of Spinal Cord Independence Measure version III were collected and used to calculate SCAR difference between data on date of admission and discharge. MCID and MDC were calculated by distribution-based method and categorized for each subgroup according to SCI characteristics.

RESULTS

From data of 311 individuals, MCID of SCAR is approximately 4 for individual with tetraplegia AIS A, B, C; and individual with AIS D at any level, and 2 for individual with paraplegia AIS A, B, C. MDC of SCAR should be 1 for individual with tetraplegia AIS A, B, C; and individual with AIS D at any level and 0.5 for individual with paraplegia AIS A, B, C.

CONCLUSION

This study provides MCID and MDC of SCAR in each subgroup. These values could be used as a benchmark for clinicians and researchers to determine whether participant has significant improvement or not after receiving an intervention.

摘要

研究设计

回顾性队列研究。

目的

在泰国脊髓损伤(SCI)患者中寻找脊髓能力标尺(SCAR)的最小临床重要差异(MCID)和最小可检测变化(MDC)。

地点

玛哈沙拉堪清迈医院康复病房。

方法

分析首次入院接受康复治疗且未诊断为中央脊髓综合征的 SCI 患者的数据。收集上肢运动评分、脊髓独立性测量第三版的自理和移动项目,并用于计算入院和出院时 SCAR 差异。通过基于分布的方法计算 MCID 和 MDC,并根据 SCI 特征对每个亚组进行分类。

结果

从 311 名患者的数据中得出,四肢瘫痪 AIS A、B、C 的个体以及任何水平的 AIS D 的个体的 SCAR MCID 约为 4,而 AIS A、B、C 的个体的 SCAR MCID 约为 2。四肢瘫痪 AIS A、B、C 的个体以及任何水平的 AIS D 的个体的 SCAR MDC 应为 1,而 AIS A、B、C 的个体的 SCAR MDC 应为 0.5。

结论

本研究提供了每个亚组中 SCAR 的 MCID 和 MDC。这些值可作为临床医生和研究人员的基准,用于确定患者在接受干预后是否有显著改善。

相似文献

1
Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and minimal detectable change (MDC) of Spinal Cord Ability Ruler (SCAR).脊髓能力尺(SCAR)的最小临床重要差异(MCID)和最小可检测变化(MDC)。
Spinal Cord. 2023 Dec;61(12):652-657. doi: 10.1038/s41393-023-00934-x. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
2
What Are the Minimum Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient-Acceptable Symptom State Thresholds for the Modified Harris Hip Score and International Hip Outcome Tool 12 Among Patients Who Undergo Periacetabular Osteotomy?对于接受髋臼周围截骨术的患者,改良Harris髋关节评分和国际髋关节结果工具12的最小临床重要差异、显著临床益处及患者可接受的症状状态阈值分别是多少?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 12. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003393.
3
Clinical Subsets of Central Cord Syndrome: Is It a Distinct Entity from Other Forms of Incomplete Tetraplegia for Research?中央索综合征的临床亚型:它是否是与其他形式不完全四肢瘫痪不同的研究实体?
J Neurotrauma. 2024 Sep;41(17-18):2133-2145. doi: 10.1089/neu.2023.0613. Epub 2024 May 9.
4
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
5
Development of a machine learning model and a web application for predicting neurological outcome at hospital discharge in spinal cord injury patients.开发用于预测脊髓损伤患者出院时神经功能结局的机器学习模型和网络应用程序。
Spine J. 2025 Jan 31. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2025.01.005.
6
Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的肺康复治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 23;2015(2):CD003793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003793.pub3.
7
Management of faecal incontinence and constipation in adults with central neurological diseases.成人中枢神经系统疾病患者粪便失禁和便秘的管理
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 13;2014(1):CD002115. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002115.pub5.
8
Exercise for acutely hospitalised older medical patients.急性住院老年医学患者的运动治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 10;11(11):CD005955. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005955.pub3.
9
Management of faecal incontinence and constipation in adults with central neurological diseases.成人中枢神经系统疾病患者大便失禁和便秘的管理
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 18(12):CD002115. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002115.pub4.
10
The Role of Motor Zones of Partial Preservation in Conversion From Initially Complete to Motor Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury.部分保留运动区在脊髓损伤从最初的完全性向运动不完全性转变中的作用
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2025 Jul;106(7):1053-1063. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2025.01.473. Epub 2025 Feb 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Updates of the International Standards for Neurologic Classification of Spinal Cord Injury: 2015 and 2019.国际脊髓损伤神经分类标准更新:2015 年和 2019 年。
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2020 Aug;31(3):319-330. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2020.03.005. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
2
Feasibility of predicting improvements in motor function following SCI using the SCAR outcome measure: a retrospective study.使用 SCAR 结局测量预测 SCI 后运动功能改善的可行性:一项回顾性研究。
Spinal Cord. 2019 Nov;57(11):966-971. doi: 10.1038/s41393-019-0307-z. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
3
Is admission to an SCI specialized rehabilitation facility associated with better functional outcomes? Analysis of data from the Thai Spinal Cord Injury Registry.
入住 SCI 专科康复机构是否与更好的功能结果相关?来自泰国脊髓损伤登记处的数据分析。
Spinal Cord. 2019 Aug;57(8):684-691. doi: 10.1038/s41393-019-0267-3. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
4
Distribution- and anchor-based methods to determine the minimally important difference on patient-reported outcome questionnaires in oncology: a structured review.分布和锚定基方法在肿瘤患者报告结局问卷中的最小重要差异的确定:系统评价。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Dec 11;16(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1055-z.
5
Minimal Clinically Important Difference: A Review of Outcome Measure Score Interpretation.最小临床重要差异:结局测量分数解读综述
Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2018 May;44(2):177-188. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2018.01.011. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
6
International Spinal Cord Injury Core Data Set (version 2.0)-including standardization of reporting.国际脊髓损伤核心数据集(第2.0版)——包括报告的标准化。
Spinal Cord. 2017 Aug;55(8):759-764. doi: 10.1038/sc.2017.59. Epub 2017 May 30.
7
Spinal cord ability ruler: an interval scale to measure volitional performance after spinal cord injury.脊髓能力标尺:一种用于测量脊髓损伤后意志表现的等距量表。
Spinal Cord. 2017 Aug;55(8):730-738. doi: 10.1038/sc.2017.1. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
8
What do spinal cord injury patients think of their improvement? A study of the minimal clinically important difference of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III.脊髓损伤患者如何看待自己的改善?《脊髓独立性测量量表 III 的最小临床重要差异研究》。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Aug;53(4):508-515. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04240-X. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
9
How Small Is Big: Sample Size and Skewness.小亦大焉:样本量与偏度
Assessment. 2018 Sep;25(6):793-800. doi: 10.1177/1073191116669784. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
10
Minimal clinically important difference of the functional gait assessment in older adults.老年人功能步态评估的最小临床重要差异。
Phys Ther. 2014 Nov;94(11):1594-603. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130596. Epub 2014 Jun 19.