• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直肠和结肠息肉的流行病学。息肉检测2年后未切除息肉的转归及评估

Epidemiology of polyps in the rectum and colon. Recovery and evaluation of unresected polyps 2 years after detection.

作者信息

Hoff G, Foerster A, Vatn M H, Sauar J, Larsen S

出版信息

Scand J Gastroenterol. 1986 Sep;21(7):853-62. doi: 10.3109/00365528609011130.

DOI:10.3109/00365528609011130
PMID:3775252
Abstract

In an endoscopic population screening study for colorectal polyps among 200 men and 200 women, 50-59 years of age, 215 polyps less than 5 mm in diameter were left in situ for the present 2-year follow-up examination. The attendance rate was 102 of 106 (96%) for polyp patients and 77 of 90 (86%) in the control group. Of 194 polyps, 143 (74%) in the 102 polyp-bearing individuals were recovered for histological evaluation and 57 polyps were registered as new. Ninety-nine (50%) of the polyps were hyperplastic, 45 (23%) were adenomas, and 45 (23%) were mucosal tags. Both growth and regression of polyps were registered. Regression was commoner in the distal part of the rectum than in the proximal part or distal sigmoid colon. Growth was similar for recovered adenomas and hyperplastic polyps, whereas mucosal tags more often showed diminution in size. No polyp had reached a size of more than 5 mm in 2 years, and no case of severe dysplasia or carcinoma was registered. The estimated total polyp mass more than doubled both for adenomas and hyperplastic polyps. It is concluded that the time interval between initial examination with removal of polyps 5 mm or larger in diameter and the first follow-up examination may safely be set at 2 years.

摘要

在一项针对200名年龄在50 - 59岁的男性和200名女性进行的结直肠息肉内镜人群筛查研究中,215枚直径小于5毫米的息肉被留作原位观察,进行本次为期2年的随访检查。息肉患者的随访率为106人中的102人(96%),对照组为90人中的77人(86%)。在194枚息肉中,102名有息肉的个体中的143枚(74%)被回收用于组织学评估,57枚息肉被登记为新增息肉。99枚(50%)息肉为增生性息肉,45枚(23%)为腺瘤,45枚(23%)为黏膜赘生物。息肉的生长和消退情况均有记录。息肉消退在直肠远端比在近端或乙状结肠远端更常见。回收的腺瘤和增生性息肉的生长情况相似,而黏膜赘生物的大小更常减小。2年内没有息肉直径超过5毫米,也没有严重发育异常或癌变的病例记录。腺瘤和增生性息肉的估计息肉总量均增加了一倍多。结论是,首次检查时切除直径5毫米或更大的息肉与首次随访检查之间的时间间隔可以安全地设定为2年。

相似文献

1
Epidemiology of polyps in the rectum and colon. Recovery and evaluation of unresected polyps 2 years after detection.直肠和结肠息肉的流行病学。息肉检测2年后未切除息肉的转归及评估
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1986 Sep;21(7):853-62. doi: 10.3109/00365528609011130.
2
Growth of colorectal polyps: redetection and evaluation of unresected polyps for a period of three years.结直肠息肉的生长:对未切除息肉进行为期三年的重新检测与评估
Gut. 1996 Sep;39(3):449-56. doi: 10.1136/gut.39.3.449.
3
Epidemiology of polyps in the rectum and sigmoid colon. Histological examination of resected polyps.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1985 Aug;20(6):677-83. doi: 10.3109/00365528509089194.
4
Epidemiology of polyps in the rectum and sigmoid colon. Size, enzyme levels, DNA distributions, and nuclear diameter in polyps of the large intestine.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1985 Oct;20(8):983-9. doi: 10.3109/00365528509088859.
5
Epidemiology of polyps in the rectum and sigmoid colon. Endoscopic evaluation of size and localization of polyps.直肠和乙状结肠息肉的流行病学。息肉大小及定位的内镜评估。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1985 Apr;20(3):356-60. doi: 10.3109/00365528509091664.
6
Correlation of polypoid lesions in the distal colorectum and proximal colon in asymptomatic screening subjects.无症状筛查人群中远端结直肠与近端结肠息肉样病变的相关性
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1996 Apr;8(4):351-4. doi: 10.1097/00042737-199604000-00012.
7
Epidemiology of polyps in the rectum and sigmoid colon. Discriminant analysis for identification of individuals at risk of developing colorectal neoplasia.直肠和乙状结肠息肉的流行病学。鉴别分析以识别有发生结直肠肿瘤风险的个体。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1986 Sep;21(7):848-52. doi: 10.3109/00365528609011129.
8
Distal hyperplastic polyps do not predict proximal adenomas: results from a multicentric study of colorectal adenomas.远端增生性息肉不能预测近端腺瘤:一项关于结直肠腺瘤的多中心研究结果
Gastrointest Endosc. 1997 Aug;46(2):124-30. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(97)70059-2.
9
Prevalence and malignant potential of colorectal polyps in asymptomatic, average-risk men.无症状平均风险男性结直肠息肉的患病率及恶性潜能
Am J Gastroenterol. 1991 Aug;86(8):941-5.
10
Small rectosigmoid polyps as markers of proximal neoplasms.
Dis Colon Rectum. 1993 Dec;36(12):1121-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02052260.

引用本文的文献

1
Natural History of Colorectal Polyps Undergoing Longitudinal in Vivo CT Colonography Surveillance.结直肠息肉行 CT 结肠成像纵向体内监测的自然史。
Radiology. 2024 Jan;310(1):e232078. doi: 10.1148/radiol.232078.
2
Growth rates and histopathological outcomes of small (6-9 mm) colorectal polyps based on CT colonography surveillance and endoscopic removal.基于 CT 结肠成像监测和内镜下切除的小(6-9mm)结直肠息肉的生长速度和组织病理学结果。
Gut. 2023 Nov 24;72(12):2321-2328. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-326970.
3
Follow-up of small and diminutive colonic polyps-How to balance the risks in the COVID-19 era.
小的和微小的结肠息肉的随访——如何在新冠疫情时代平衡风险
Colorectal Dis. 2021 Dec;23(12):3061-3064. doi: 10.1111/codi.15907. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
4
A Diffusion-like Process Accommodates New Crypts During Clonal Expansion in Human Colonic Epithelium.在人类结肠上皮的克隆扩张过程中,一种类似扩散的过程为新隐窝提供了空间。
Gastroenterology. 2021 Aug;161(2):548-559.e23. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.04.035. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
5
Tumour growth rate of carcinoma of the colon and rectum: retrospective cohort study.结直肠癌的肿瘤生长速率:回顾性队列研究
BJS Open. 2020 Sep 30;4(6):1200-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50355.
6
Screening colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy for reduction of colorectal cancer incidence: A case-control study.筛查结肠镜检查和乙状结肠镜检查对降低结直肠癌发病率的作用:一项病例对照研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 5;14(12):e0226027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226027. eCollection 2019.
7
The Natural History of Colorectal Polyps: Overview of Predictive Static and Dynamic Features.结直肠息肉的自然史:预测静态和动态特征概述。
Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2018 Sep;47(3):515-536. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
8
CMOST: an open-source framework for the microsimulation of colorectal cancer screening strategies.CMOST:一种用于结直肠癌筛查策略微观模拟的开源框架。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Jun 5;17(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0458-9.
9
The potential of imaging techniques as a screening tool for colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.成像技术作为结直肠癌筛查工具的潜力:一项成本效益分析。
Br J Radiol. 2016 Jul;89(1063):20150910. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150910. Epub 2016 May 19.
10
Surveillance of colonic polyps: Are we getting it right?结肠息肉的监测:我们做得对吗?
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Feb 14;22(6):1925-34. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i6.1925.