Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜逆行阑尾切除术(从根部到尖端入路)的安全性和有效性

The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic retrograde appendicectomy, base-to-tip approach.

作者信息

Ko Ara, Lindsay Perry, Choi Julian

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Western Health, St Albans, VIC, Australia.

School of Medicine, Monash University, Campus Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2023 Sep 11;10:1256256. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1256256. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic appendicectomy is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures worldwide. There is limited evidence evaluating the role and safety of laparoscopic retrograde appendicectomy (LRA), base to tip approach, compared to standard laparoscopic antegrade appendicectomy (LAA), tip to base approach. This study aims to assess the safety of LRA compared to LAA in terms of intra-abdominal collection (IAC) rate and using Sunshine Appendicitis Grading System (SAGS).

METHODS

Records of two-hundred and seventy-three patients undergoing laparoscopic appendicectomy by LAA and LRA approaches were analysed. The severity of appendicitis was rated using a standardised Sunshine Appendicitis Grading System (SAGS) score intra-operatively. The primary outcome measure was the occurrence of an intra-abdominal collection, and secondary measures were procedure time, post-operative length of stay and other complications.

RESULTS

Of the two-hundred and seventy-three patients, there were two patients who developed an intra-abdominal collection. Both patients were in the LAA group with SAGS IV scores. Between SAGS IV patients, Chi-squared value of 0.6691. Therefore, there was no statically significant difference in the intra-abdominal collection (IAC) rate between LAA and LRA groups from this study.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study has shown that laparoscopic retrograde appendicectomy (LRA) does not increase risk of intra-abdominal collection compared to laparoscopic antegrade appendicectomy (LAA) within the limit of this study.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜阑尾切除术是全球最常施行的外科手术之一。与标准的腹腔镜顺行阑尾切除术(LAA,从尖端到根部的方法)相比,评估腹腔镜逆行阑尾切除术(LRA,从根部到尖端的方法)的作用和安全性的证据有限。本研究旨在根据腹腔内积液(IAC)发生率并使用阳光阑尾炎分级系统(SAGS)评估LRA与LAA相比的安全性。

方法

分析了273例通过LAA和LRA方法接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术的患者的记录。术中使用标准化的阳光阑尾炎分级系统(SAGS)评分对阑尾炎的严重程度进行评级。主要结局指标是腹腔内积液的发生情况,次要指标是手术时间、术后住院时间和其他并发症。

结果

在273例患者中,有2例发生了腹腔内积液。这两名患者均在LAA组,SAGS评分为IV级。在SAGS IV级患者之间,卡方值为0.6691。因此,本研究中LAA组和LRA组之间的腹腔内积液(IAC)发生率没有统计学上的显著差异。

结论

本研究表明,在本研究的范围内,与腹腔镜顺行阑尾切除术(LAA)相比,腹腔镜逆行阑尾切除术(LRA)不会增加腹腔内积液的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1ac/10518383/24c7a1711174/fsurg-10-1256256-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验