• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜逆行阑尾切除术(从根部到尖端入路)的安全性和有效性

The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic retrograde appendicectomy, base-to-tip approach.

作者信息

Ko Ara, Lindsay Perry, Choi Julian

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Western Health, St Albans, VIC, Australia.

School of Medicine, Monash University, Campus Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2023 Sep 11;10:1256256. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1256256. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2023.1256256
PMID:37753531
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10518383/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic appendicectomy is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures worldwide. There is limited evidence evaluating the role and safety of laparoscopic retrograde appendicectomy (LRA), base to tip approach, compared to standard laparoscopic antegrade appendicectomy (LAA), tip to base approach. This study aims to assess the safety of LRA compared to LAA in terms of intra-abdominal collection (IAC) rate and using Sunshine Appendicitis Grading System (SAGS).

METHODS

Records of two-hundred and seventy-three patients undergoing laparoscopic appendicectomy by LAA and LRA approaches were analysed. The severity of appendicitis was rated using a standardised Sunshine Appendicitis Grading System (SAGS) score intra-operatively. The primary outcome measure was the occurrence of an intra-abdominal collection, and secondary measures were procedure time, post-operative length of stay and other complications.

RESULTS

Of the two-hundred and seventy-three patients, there were two patients who developed an intra-abdominal collection. Both patients were in the LAA group with SAGS IV scores. Between SAGS IV patients, Chi-squared value of 0.6691. Therefore, there was no statically significant difference in the intra-abdominal collection (IAC) rate between LAA and LRA groups from this study.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study has shown that laparoscopic retrograde appendicectomy (LRA) does not increase risk of intra-abdominal collection compared to laparoscopic antegrade appendicectomy (LAA) within the limit of this study.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜阑尾切除术是全球最常施行的外科手术之一。与标准的腹腔镜顺行阑尾切除术(LAA,从尖端到根部的方法)相比,评估腹腔镜逆行阑尾切除术(LRA,从根部到尖端的方法)的作用和安全性的证据有限。本研究旨在根据腹腔内积液(IAC)发生率并使用阳光阑尾炎分级系统(SAGS)评估LRA与LAA相比的安全性。

方法

分析了273例通过LAA和LRA方法接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术的患者的记录。术中使用标准化的阳光阑尾炎分级系统(SAGS)评分对阑尾炎的严重程度进行评级。主要结局指标是腹腔内积液的发生情况,次要指标是手术时间、术后住院时间和其他并发症。

结果

在273例患者中,有2例发生了腹腔内积液。这两名患者均在LAA组,SAGS评分为IV级。在SAGS IV级患者之间,卡方值为0.6691。因此,本研究中LAA组和LRA组之间的腹腔内积液(IAC)发生率没有统计学上的显著差异。

结论

本研究表明,在本研究的范围内,与腹腔镜顺行阑尾切除术(LAA)相比,腹腔镜逆行阑尾切除术(LRA)不会增加腹腔内积液的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1ac/10518383/24c7a1711174/fsurg-10-1256256-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1ac/10518383/24c7a1711174/fsurg-10-1256256-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1ac/10518383/24c7a1711174/fsurg-10-1256256-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic retrograde appendicectomy, base-to-tip approach.腹腔镜逆行阑尾切除术(从根部到尖端入路)的安全性和有效性
Front Surg. 2023 Sep 11;10:1256256. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1256256. eCollection 2023.
2
Prospective evaluation of the Sunshine Appendicitis Grading System score.阳光阑尾炎分级系统评分的前瞻性评估。
ANZ J Surg. 2017 May;87(5):368-371. doi: 10.1111/ans.13271. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
3
Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in children: a UK District General Hospital experience.儿童腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:一家英国地区综合医院的经验
J Pediatr Surg. 2014 Feb;49(2):277-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.11.039. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
4
Single-port laparoscopic appendicectomy versus conventional three-port approach for acute appendicitis: A systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统三孔法治疗急性阑尾炎的比较:系统评价、荟萃分析和随机对照试验的序贯分析。
Surgeon. 2021 Dec;19(6):365-379. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2021.01.018. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
5
A population-based comparison of the post-operative outcomes of open and laparoscopic appendicectomy in children.基于人群的儿童开腹和腹腔镜阑尾切除术术后结局比较。
Med J Aust. 2018 Jul 16;209(2):80-85. doi: 10.5694/mja17.00541. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
6
Early Laparoscopic Washout may Resolve Persistent Intra-abdominal Infection Post-appendicectomy.早期腹腔镜冲洗可能解决阑尾切除术后持续的腹腔内感染。
World J Surg. 2019 Apr;43(4):998-1006. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4871-8.
7
Prevention of intra-abdominal abscess following laparoscopic appendicectomy for perforated appendicitis: a prospective study.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗穿孔性阑尾炎后腹腔内脓肿的预防:一项前瞻性研究
Int J Surg. 2008 Oct;6(5):374-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2008.06.006. Epub 2008 Jun 27.
8
Laparoscopic appendicectomy in obese is associated with improvements in clinical outcome: systematic review.腹腔镜阑尾切除术在肥胖患者中的应用与临床结局的改善相关:系统评价。
Int J Surg. 2015 Jan;13:250-256. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.11.052. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
9
Comparison of intra-abdominal abscess formation following laparoscopic and open appendicectomy in children.儿童腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术后腹腔内脓肿形成的比较。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010 May;20(4):391-4. doi: 10.1089/lap.2009.0193.
10
Laparoscopic appendicectomy for complicated appendicitis: is it safe and justified?: A retrospective analysis.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎:是否安全且合理?一项回顾性分析。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Jun;21(3):142-5. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31821ad770.

本文引用的文献

1
Is the use of endoloops safe and efficient for the closure of the appendicular stump in complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis?在复杂和不复杂的急性阑尾炎中,使用 Endoloops 闭合阑尾残端是否安全有效?
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Aug;406(5):1581-1589. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-02050-3. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
2
How to do a laparoscopic retrograde appendicectomy for the difficult appendix.
ANZ J Surg. 2020 Apr;90(4):612-613. doi: 10.1111/ans.15658. Epub 2020 Jan 19.
3
Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management.急性阑尾炎:发病机制、诊断和治疗的现代认识。
Lancet. 2015 Sep 26;386(10000):1278-1287. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00275-5.
4
Prospective evaluation of the Sunshine Appendicitis Grading System score.阳光阑尾炎分级系统评分的前瞻性评估。
ANZ J Surg. 2017 May;87(5):368-371. doi: 10.1111/ans.13271. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
5
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients with suspected appendicitis: a systematic review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.疑似阑尾炎患者的腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:随机对照试验的Meta分析的系统评价
BMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr 15;15:48. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0277-3.
6
Short-term complications and long-term morbidity of laparoscopic and open appendicectomy in a national cohort.腹腔镜和开腹阑尾切除术在全国队列中的短期并发症和长期发病率。
Br J Surg. 2014 Aug;101(9):1135-42. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9552. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
7
The "BASE-FIRST" technique in laparoscopic appendectomy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的“基底优先”技术。
J Minim Access Surg. 2012 Jan;8(1):6-8. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.91772.
8
Simplified technique for laparoscopic appendectomy.
ANZ J Surg. 2002 Apr;72(4):294-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2002.02370.x.
9
Risk factors for post-appendicectomy intra-abdominal abscess.阑尾切除术后腹腔内脓肿的危险因素。
Aust N Z J Surg. 1999 May;69(5):373-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1622.1999.01576.x.
10
Endoscopic appendectomy.内镜下阑尾切除术
Endoscopy. 1983 Mar;15(2):59-64. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1021466.