Department of General Surgery, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Department of General Surgery, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Surgeon. 2021 Dec;19(6):365-379. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2021.01.018. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare outcomes of single-port laparoscopic appendicectomy (SPLA) and conventional three-port laparoscopic appendicectomy (CLA) in the management of acute appendicitis.
A comprehensive systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with subsequent meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of outcomes were conducted. Post-operative pain at 12-h, cosmesis, need for an additional port(s), operative time, port-site hernia, ileus, surgical site infection (SSI), intra-abdominal collection, length of hospital stay (LOS), readmission, and reoperation were the evaluated outcome parameters.
Sixteen RCTs with total number of 2017 patients who underwent SPLA (n = 1009) or CLA (n = 1008) were included. SPLA was associated with a significantly higher cosmetic score (MD 1.11, P= 0.03) but significantly longer operative time (MD 7.08, P = 0.00001) compared to CLA. However, the difference was not significant between SPLA and CLA in the post-operative pain score at 12-h (MD -0.13, P = 0.69), need for additional port(s) (RR0.03, P = 0.07), port-site hernia (RD: 0.00, P = 0.68), ileus (RR 0.74, P = 0.51), SSI (RR 1.38, P = 0.28), post-operative intra-abdominal collection (RR 0.00, P = 0.62), LOS (MD -2.41, P = 0.16), readmission to the hospital (RR 0.45, P = 0.22), and return to theatre (RR 0.00, P = 0.49). Trial sequential analysis demonstrated that the meta-analysis is conclusive for most of the outcomes, except LOS and intra-abdominal collection.
Although SPLA is associated with a slightly longer operative time, its efficacy and safety are comparable to CLA in management of uncomplicated appendicitis. Moreover, it offers improved post-operative cosmesis. The available evidence is conclusive, and further trials may not be required.
本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在比较单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术(SPLA)和传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术(CLA)治疗急性阑尾炎的效果。
对随机对照试验(RCT)进行全面系统评价,并随后进行荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。评估的结果参数包括术后 12 小时的疼痛、美容效果、是否需要额外的端口、手术时间、切口疝、肠梗阻、手术部位感染(SSI)、腹腔内积液、住院时间(LOS)、再入院和再次手术。
纳入了 16 项 RCT,共 2017 名接受 SPLA(n=1009)或 CLA(n=1008)治疗的患者。与 CLA 相比,SPLA 具有更高的美容评分(MD 1.11,P=0.03),但手术时间明显更长(MD 7.08,P=0.00001)。然而,SPLA 与 CLA 在术后 12 小时的疼痛评分(MD-0.13,P=0.69)、是否需要额外的端口(RR0.03,P=0.07)、切口疝(RD:0.00,P=0.68)、肠梗阻(RR 0.74,P=0.51)、SSI(RR 1.38,P=0.28)、术后腹腔内积液(RR 0.00,P=0.62)、LOS(MD-2.41,P=0.16)、再入院(RR 0.45,P=0.22)和再次手术(RR 0.00,P=0.49)方面差异无统计学意义。试验序贯分析表明,除 LOS 和腹腔内积液外,大多数结果的荟萃分析具有结论性。
尽管 SPLA 手术时间稍长,但在治疗单纯性阑尾炎方面,其疗效和安全性与 CLA 相当。此外,它还能提供更好的术后美容效果。现有证据具有结论性,可能不需要进一步的试验。