Suppr超能文献

单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统三孔法治疗急性阑尾炎的比较:系统评价、荟萃分析和随机对照试验的序贯分析。

Single-port laparoscopic appendicectomy versus conventional three-port approach for acute appendicitis: A systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.

Department of General Surgery, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Surgeon. 2021 Dec;19(6):365-379. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2021.01.018. Epub 2021 Mar 19.

Abstract

AIMS

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare outcomes of single-port laparoscopic appendicectomy (SPLA) and conventional three-port laparoscopic appendicectomy (CLA) in the management of acute appendicitis.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with subsequent meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of outcomes were conducted. Post-operative pain at 12-h, cosmesis, need for an additional port(s), operative time, port-site hernia, ileus, surgical site infection (SSI), intra-abdominal collection, length of hospital stay (LOS), readmission, and reoperation were the evaluated outcome parameters.

RESULTS

Sixteen RCTs with total number of 2017 patients who underwent SPLA (n = 1009) or CLA (n = 1008) were included. SPLA was associated with a significantly higher cosmetic score (MD 1.11, P= 0.03) but significantly longer operative time (MD 7.08, P = 0.00001) compared to CLA. However, the difference was not significant between SPLA and CLA in the post-operative pain score at 12-h (MD -0.13, P = 0.69), need for additional port(s) (RR0.03, P = 0.07), port-site hernia (RD: 0.00, P = 0.68), ileus (RR 0.74, P = 0.51), SSI (RR 1.38, P = 0.28), post-operative intra-abdominal collection (RR 0.00, P = 0.62), LOS (MD -2.41, P = 0.16), readmission to the hospital (RR 0.45, P = 0.22), and return to theatre (RR 0.00, P = 0.49). Trial sequential analysis demonstrated that the meta-analysis is conclusive for most of the outcomes, except LOS and intra-abdominal collection.

CONCLUSION

Although SPLA is associated with a slightly longer operative time, its efficacy and safety are comparable to CLA in management of uncomplicated appendicitis. Moreover, it offers improved post-operative cosmesis. The available evidence is conclusive, and further trials may not be required.

摘要

目的

本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在比较单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术(SPLA)和传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术(CLA)治疗急性阑尾炎的效果。

方法

对随机对照试验(RCT)进行全面系统评价,并随后进行荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。评估的结果参数包括术后 12 小时的疼痛、美容效果、是否需要额外的端口、手术时间、切口疝、肠梗阻、手术部位感染(SSI)、腹腔内积液、住院时间(LOS)、再入院和再次手术。

结果

纳入了 16 项 RCT,共 2017 名接受 SPLA(n=1009)或 CLA(n=1008)治疗的患者。与 CLA 相比,SPLA 具有更高的美容评分(MD 1.11,P=0.03),但手术时间明显更长(MD 7.08,P=0.00001)。然而,SPLA 与 CLA 在术后 12 小时的疼痛评分(MD-0.13,P=0.69)、是否需要额外的端口(RR0.03,P=0.07)、切口疝(RD:0.00,P=0.68)、肠梗阻(RR 0.74,P=0.51)、SSI(RR 1.38,P=0.28)、术后腹腔内积液(RR 0.00,P=0.62)、LOS(MD-2.41,P=0.16)、再入院(RR 0.45,P=0.22)和再次手术(RR 0.00,P=0.49)方面差异无统计学意义。试验序贯分析表明,除 LOS 和腹腔内积液外,大多数结果的荟萃分析具有结论性。

结论

尽管 SPLA 手术时间稍长,但在治疗单纯性阑尾炎方面,其疗效和安全性与 CLA 相当。此外,它还能提供更好的术后美容效果。现有证据具有结论性,可能不需要进一步的试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验