Suppr超能文献

斑秃严重程度评估的二维平面测量法与斑秃严重程度工具的比较:一项初步研究。

Two-dimensional planimetry for alopecia areata severity evaluation compared with severity of alopecia tool: A pilot study.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University, Busan, South Korea.

出版信息

Skin Res Technol. 2023 Sep;29(9):e13440. doi: 10.1111/srt.13440.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) is widely used to assess the severity of alopecia areata (AA). However, physician-related subjectivity exists in SALT scoring (S1-5), especially with initial inspection in the clinical practice. This study investigated two-dimensional planimetric method to calculate actual surface area of AA, validating SALT scoring.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

SALT score was measured twice in each patient based on "initial" inspection in the clinic (SALT-I) and retrospective assessment of the "photograph" (SALT-P). Planimetric surface area was calculated by Image J program. Subgroup analysis was performed depending on the agreement between SALT-I and -P; score was described in the order of SALT-I and SALT-P.

RESULTS

A total of 93 subjects were enrolled. Planimetric surface area (cm ) of SALT-I was 2.5-74.9 (S1), 48.8-100.6 (S2), 83.6-205.4 (S3), and 282-367.9 (S4), while SALT-P was 2.5-59.2 (S1), 41.6-205.4 (S2), 48.8-183.2 (S3), and 282-367.9 (S4). In subgroup analysis, SALT-I and SALT-P agreed group showed planimetric surface area (cm ) as 2.5-59.2 (S1-1), 64.2-100.6 (S2-2), 168.3-183 (S3-3), and 282.6-367.9 (S4-4). Disagreed group showed the value as 54.7 (S1-2), 41.6-74.9 (S2-1), 83.6-205.4 (S2-3), and 48.8-88.6 (S3-2).

CONCLUSION

SALT-P was more clearly correlated with actual surface area than SALT-I. Planimetric surface area measurement could be used as a supplementary method especially in the S1 to S3, suggesting 60 cm , 100 cm , and 200 cm as objective cutoff values to differentiate S1, S2, and S3.

摘要

背景

脱发严重程度评估工具(SALT)广泛用于评估斑秃(AA)的严重程度。然而,在 SALT 评分中存在医生相关的主观性(S1-5),尤其是在临床实践中的初始检查。本研究旨在通过二维平面测量法计算 AA 的实际表面积,验证 SALT 评分的准确性。

材料与方法

每位患者均根据诊所的“初始”检查(SALT-I)和“照片”的回顾性评估(SALT-P)进行两次 SALT 评分。使用 Image J 程序计算表面积。根据 SALT-I 和 SALT-P 的一致性进行亚组分析;按 SALT-I 和 SALT-P 的顺序描述评分。

结果

共纳入 93 例患者。SALT-I 的平面面积(cm )为 2.5-74.9(S1)、48.8-100.6(S2)、83.6-205.4(S3)和 282-367.9(S4),而 SALT-P 为 2.5-59.2(S1)、41.6-205.4(S2)、48.8-183.2(S3)和 282-367.9(S4)。在亚组分析中,SALT-I 和 SALT-P 一致的组显示平面面积(cm )为 2.5-59.2(S1-1)、64.2-100.6(S2-2)、168.3-183(S3-3)和 282-367.9(S4-4)。不一致的组显示值为 54.7(S1-2)、41.6-74.9(S2-1)、83.6-205.4(S2-3)和 48.8-88.6(S3-2)。

结论

与 SALT-I 相比,SALT-P 与实际表面积的相关性更明显。平面面积测量可作为一种补充方法,尤其是在 S1 至 S3 中,建议使用 60 cm 、100 cm 和 200 cm 作为客观截断值来区分 S1、S2 和 S3。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b35/10444945/2a6be2d20b5b/SRT-29-e13440-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验