Cogo Elise, Elsayed Mohamed, Bhardwaj Sukriti, Cooley Kieran, Aycho Christilynn, Liang Vivian, Papadogianis Peter, Psihogios Athanasios, Seely Dugald
Patterson Institute for Integrative Oncology Research, Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine, Toronto, ON M2K 1E2, Canada.
Radiation Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo 11796, Egypt.
Curr Oncol. 2023 Sep 6;30(9):8196-8219. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30090595.
We aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of mistletoe extract (ME) use during the oncological perioperative period.
Details registered a priori on PROSPERO (CRD42018086168).
Seven RCTs (comprising 663 participants in nine reports) and three nonrandomized studies were included. In five RCTs, ME was evaluated as adjunctive care and the control group had no additional intervention, whereas in two RCTs, ME was compared head-to-head against common cancer treatments (i.e., etoposide or bacillus Calmette-Guérin) with the intervention groups not receiving standard care. Meta-analyses found no evidence for a difference between ME and no added therapy for mortality and recurrence (RR, 95% CI: 1.00, 0.79-1.27; and 1.03, 0.79-1.33, respectively). Two RCTs reported beneficial effects of ME on immune cells, specifically natural killer cells, in colorectal cancer, and one RCT reported quality of life improvement. Two RCTs reported ME discontinuations due to adverse events and grade 3/4 toxicities. Nevertheless, no safety signals were detected from these 10 studies. Quality appraisal revealed a substantial risk of bias.
Preliminary data are encouraging for mistletoe extracts, particularly in the context of colorectal cancer. However, the evidence is limited by the number of studies, an evaluation of different outcomes, and methodological limitations. Further high-quality research is warranted.
我们旨在评估在肿瘤围手术期使用槲寄生提取物(ME)的安全性和有效性。
预先在PROSPERO(CRD42018086168)上注册详细信息。
纳入了7项随机对照试验(9篇报告中的663名参与者)和3项非随机研究。在5项随机对照试验中,ME被评估为辅助治疗,对照组未接受额外干预,而在2项随机对照试验中,ME与常见癌症治疗(即依托泊苷或卡介苗)进行了直接比较,干预组未接受标准治疗。荟萃分析未发现ME与未添加治疗在死亡率和复发率方面存在差异的证据(相对风险,95%置信区间:分别为1.00,0.79 - 1.27;以及1.03,0.79 - 1.33)。两项随机对照试验报告了ME对结直肠癌免疫细胞,特别是自然杀伤细胞的有益作用,一项随机对照试验报告了生活质量的改善。两项随机对照试验报告了因不良事件和3/4级毒性而停用ME的情况。然而,从这10项研究中未检测到安全信号。质量评估显示存在严重的偏倚风险。
槲寄生提取物的初步数据令人鼓舞,特别是在结直肠癌方面。然而,证据受到研究数量、不同结局评估以及方法学局限性的限制。有必要进行进一步的高质量研究。