Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
The Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Nat Rev Urol. 2024 Mar;21(3):133-157. doi: 10.1038/s41585-023-00818-y. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
The clinical presentation of renal cell cancer (RCC) is shifting towards incidental and early detection, creating new challenges in RCC diagnosis. Overtreatment might be reduced with the development of new diagnostic biomarkers to distinguish benign from malignant small renal masses (SRMs). Differently from tissue biopsies, liquid biopsies are obtained from a patient's blood or urine and, therefore, are minimally invasive and suitable for longitudinal monitoring. The most promising types of liquid biopsy biomarkers for RCC diagnosis are circulating tumour cells, extracellular vesicles (EVs) and cell-free DNA. Circulating tumour cell assays have the highest specificity, with low processing time and costs. However, the biological characteristics and low sensitivity limit the use of these markers in SRM diagnostics. Cell-free DNA might complement the diagnosis of high-volume RCC, but the potential for clinical application in SRMs is limited. EVs have the highest biological abundance and the highest sensitivity in identifying low-volume disease; moreover, the molecular characteristics of these markers make EVs suitable for multiple analytical applications. Thus, currently, EV assays have the greatest potential for diagnostic application in RCC (including identification of SRMs). All these liquid biomarkers have potential in clinical practice, pending validation studies. Biomarker implementation will be needed to also improve characterization of RCC subtypes. Last, diagnostic biomarkers might be extended to prognostic or predictive applications.
肾细胞癌 (RCC) 的临床表现正朝着偶发性和早期发现的方向转变,这给 RCC 的诊断带来了新的挑战。通过开发新的诊断生物标志物来区分良性和恶性小肾肿瘤 (SRM),可以减少过度治疗。与组织活检不同,液体活检是从患者的血液或尿液中获得的,因此具有微创性,适合进行纵向监测。用于 RCC 诊断的最有前途的液体活检生物标志物类型是循环肿瘤细胞、细胞外囊泡 (EV) 和无细胞 DNA。循环肿瘤细胞检测具有最高的特异性,处理时间和成本低。然而,这些标记物的生物学特性和低灵敏度限制了它们在 SRM 诊断中的应用。无细胞 DNA 可能有助于诊断大体积 RCC,但在 SRM 中的临床应用潜力有限。EV 具有最高的生物学丰度和识别小体积疾病的最高灵敏度;此外,这些标记物的分子特征使 EV 适合多种分析应用。因此,目前,EV 检测在 RCC(包括 SRM 识别)的诊断应用中具有最大的潜力。所有这些液体生物标志物都具有临床应用的潜力,但有待验证研究的验证。生物标志物的实施还需要改善 RCC 亚型的特征。最后,诊断生物标志物可能扩展到预后或预测应用。