• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 MRI 的机器学习模型预测脑膜瘤的恶性生物学行为。

MRI-based machine learning models predict the malignant biological behavior of meningioma.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Chengdu Qingbaijiang District People's Hospital, Chengdu, 610300, Sichuan, China.

Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, 610500, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

BMC Med Imaging. 2023 Sep 27;23(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12880-023-01101-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12880-023-01101-7
PMID:37759192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10537075/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The WHO grade and Ki-67 index are independent indices used to evaluate the malignant biological behavior of meningioma. This study aims to develop MRI-based machine learning models to predict the malignant biological behavior of meningioma from the perspective of the WHO grade, Ki-67 index, and their combination.

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective study included 313 meningioma patients, of which 70 were classified as high-grade (WHO II/III) and 243 as low-grade (WHO I). The Ki-67 expression was classified into low-expression (n = 216) and high-expression (n = 97) groups with a threshold of 5%. Among them, there were 128 patients with malignant biological behavior whose WHO grade or Ki-67 index increased either or both. Data from Center A and B are were utilized for model development, while data from Center C and D were used for external validation. Radiomic features were extracted from the maximum cross-sectional area (2D) region of Interest (ROI) and the whole tumor volume (3D) ROI using different paraments from the T1, T2-weighted, and T1 contrast-enhanced sequences (T1CE), followed by five independent feature selections and eight classifiers. 240 prediction models were constructed to predict the WHO grade, Ki-67 index and their combination respectively. Models were evaluated by cross-validation in training set (n = 224). Suitable models were chosen by comparing the cross-validation (CV) area under the curves (AUC) and their relative standard deviations (RSD). Clinical and radiological features were collected and analyzed; meaningful features were combined with radiomic features to establish the clinical-radiological-radiomic (CRR) models. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate those models in validation set. Radiomic models and CRR models were compared by Delong test.

RESULTS

1218 and 1781 radiomic features were extracted from 2D ROI and 3D ROI of each sequence. The selected grade, Ki-67 index and their combination radiomic models were T1CE-2D-LASSO-LR, T1CE-3D-LASSO-NB, and T1CE-2D-LASSO-LR, with cross-validated AUCs on the training set were 0.857, 0.798, and 0.888, the RSDs were 0.06, 0.09, and 0.05, the validation set AUCs were 0.829, 0.752, and 0.904, respectively. Heterogeneous enhancement was found to be associated with high grade and Ki-67 status, while surrounding invasion was associated with the high grade status, peritumoral edema and cerebrospinal fluid space surrounding tumor were correlated with the high Ki-67 status. The Delong test showed that these significant radiological features did not significantly improve the predictive performance. The AUCs for CRR models predicting grade, Ki-67 index, and their combination in the validation set were 0.821, 0.753, and 0.906, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that MRI-based machine learning models could effectively predict the grade, Ki-67 index of meningioma. Models considering these two indices might be valuable for improving the predictive sensitivity and comprehensiveness of prediction of malignant biological behavior of meningioma.

摘要

背景

世界卫生组织(WHO)分级和 Ki-67 指数是评估脑膜瘤恶性生物学行为的独立指标。本研究旨在从 WHO 分级、Ki-67 指数及其组合的角度,利用基于 MRI 的机器学习模型预测脑膜瘤的恶性生物学行为。

方法

这是一项多中心、回顾性研究,共纳入 313 例脑膜瘤患者,其中 70 例为高级别(WHO II/III 级),243 例为低级别(WHO I 级)。Ki-67 表达以 5%为界分为低表达(n=216)和高表达(n=97)组。其中,有 128 例患者的 WHO 分级或 Ki-67 指数升高。利用来自中心 A 和 B 的数据进行模型开发,同时利用来自中心 C 和 D 的数据进行外部验证。从 T1、T2 加权和 T1 对比增强序列(T1CE)的最大横截面积(2D)感兴趣区(ROI)和整个肿瘤体积(3D)ROI 中提取放射组学特征,然后使用不同参数进行五次独立特征选择和八种分类器。分别构建 240 个预测模型来预测 WHO 分级、Ki-67 指数及其组合。在训练集(n=224)中通过交叉验证评估模型。通过比较交叉验证(CV)曲线下面积(AUC)及其相对标准偏差(RSD)来选择合适的模型。收集和分析临床和影像学特征;将有意义的特征与放射组学特征相结合,建立临床-放射-放射组学(CRR)模型。利用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析在验证集上评估这些模型。通过 Delong 检验比较放射组学模型和 CRR 模型。

结果

从每个序列的 2D ROI 和 3D ROI 中提取了 1218 个和 1781 个放射组学特征。选定的分级、Ki-67 指数及其组合的放射组学模型分别为 T1CE-2D-LASSO-LR、T1CE-3D-LASSO-NB 和 T1CE-2D-LASSO-LR,在训练集上的 CV AUC 分别为 0.857、0.798 和 0.888,RSD 分别为 0.06、0.09 和 0.05,验证集 AUC 分别为 0.829、0.752 和 0.904。不均匀强化与高级别和 Ki-67 状态相关,而周围侵犯与高级别相关,周围肿瘤水肿和肿瘤周围脑脊液空间与高 Ki-67 状态相关。Delong 检验表明这些显著的影像学特征并没有显著提高预测性能。CRR 模型在验证集上预测分级、Ki-67 指数及其组合的 AUC 分别为 0.821、0.753 和 0.906。

结论

本研究表明,基于 MRI 的机器学习模型可以有效地预测脑膜瘤的分级、Ki-67 指数。考虑这些两个指数的模型可能有助于提高脑膜瘤恶性生物学行为预测的敏感性和全面性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adf1/10537075/6d3653110001/12880_2023_1101_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adf1/10537075/ef98f1bfcb30/12880_2023_1101_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adf1/10537075/262834863d5d/12880_2023_1101_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adf1/10537075/729d8d5f3ff6/12880_2023_1101_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adf1/10537075/6d3653110001/12880_2023_1101_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adf1/10537075/ef98f1bfcb30/12880_2023_1101_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adf1/10537075/262834863d5d/12880_2023_1101_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adf1/10537075/729d8d5f3ff6/12880_2023_1101_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adf1/10537075/6d3653110001/12880_2023_1101_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
MRI-based machine learning models predict the malignant biological behavior of meningioma.基于 MRI 的机器学习模型预测脑膜瘤的恶性生物学行为。
BMC Med Imaging. 2023 Sep 27;23(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12880-023-01101-7.
2
Radiomic signatures of meningiomas using the Ki-67 proliferation index as a prognostic marker of clinical outcomes.使用 Ki-67 增殖指数作为脑膜瘤临床结局的预后标志物的脑膜瘤放射组学特征。
Neurosurg Focus. 2023 Jun;54(6):E17. doi: 10.3171/2023.3.FOCUS2337.
3
Radiomic Features of the Edema Region May Contribute to Grading Meningiomas With Peritumoral Edema.瘤周水肿区的放射组学特征可能有助于脑膜瘤分级。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2023 Jul;58(1):301-310. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28494. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
4
Machine learning-based radiomics analysis in predicting the meningioma grade using multiparametric MRI.基于机器学习的多参数 MRI 放射组学分析预测脑膜瘤分级。
Eur J Radiol. 2020 Oct;131:109251. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109251. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
5
Machine Learning Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomic Feature Analysis to Predict Ki-67 in World Health Organization Grade I Meningiomas.基于多参数磁共振成像放射组学特征分析的机器学习预测世界卫生组织一级脑膜瘤的 Ki-67 指数。
Neurosurgery. 2021 Oct 13;89(5):928-936. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyab307.
6
Meningioma Consistency Can Be Defined by Combining the Radiomic Features of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasound Elastography. A Pilot Study Using Machine Learning Classifiers.脑膜瘤的一致性可以通过结合磁共振成像和超声弹性成像的放射组学特征来定义。使用机器学习分类器的初步研究。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Feb;146:e1147-e1159. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.11.113. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
7
Multi-parametric MRI-based machine learning model for prediction of WHO grading in patients with meningiomas.基于多参数 MRI 的机器学习模型预测脑膜瘤患者的 WHO 分级。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Apr;34(4):2468-2479. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10252-8. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
8
Predicting meningioma grades and pathologic marker expression via deep learning.通过深度学习预测脑膜瘤的分级和病理标志物表达。
Eur Radiol. 2024 May;34(5):2997-3008. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10258-2. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
9
Machine learning analyses can differentiate meningioma grade by features on magnetic resonance imaging.机器学习分析可以通过磁共振成像上的特征来区分脑膜瘤的级别。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Nov 1;45(5):E4. doi: 10.3171/2018.8.FOCUS18191.
10
Machine-Learning and Radiomics-Based Preoperative Prediction of Ki-67 Expression in Glioma Using MRI Data.基于机器学习和放射组学的 MRI 数据预测脑胶质瘤 Ki-67 表达。
Acad Radiol. 2024 Aug;31(8):3397-3405. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.02.009. Epub 2024 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Attention-based deep learning network for predicting World Health Organization meningioma grade and Ki-67 expression based on magnetic resonance imaging.基于磁共振成像的注意力深度学习网络用于预测世界卫生组织脑膜瘤分级和Ki-67表达
Eur Radiol. 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11958-7.
2
MRI-based multiregional radiomics for preoperative prediction of Ki-67 expression in meningiomas: a two-center study.基于磁共振成像的多区域影像组学用于术前预测脑膜瘤中Ki-67的表达:一项双中心研究
Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 24;16:1554539. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1554539. eCollection 2025.
3
Advancements in the application of MRI radiomics in meningioma.

本文引用的文献

1
Biparametric MRI-based radiomics classifiers for the detection of prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10 ng/mL.基于双参数MRI的影像组学分类器用于检测血清前列腺特异抗原(PSA)水平为4至10 ng/mL的前列腺癌患者。
Front Oncol. 2022 Dec 5;12:1020317. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1020317. eCollection 2022.
2
Efficient Prediction of Ki-67 Proliferation Index in Meningiomas on MRI: From Traditional Radiological Findings to a Machine Learning Approach.基于MRI对脑膜瘤中Ki-67增殖指数的高效预测:从传统放射学发现到机器学习方法
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jul 26;14(15):3637. doi: 10.3390/cancers14153637.
3
A radiomics nomogram for predicting the meningioma grade based on enhanced WI images.
磁共振成像放射组学在脑膜瘤中的应用进展
Radiat Oncol. 2025 Jul 1;20(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13014-025-02679-8.
4
Performance of Radiomics-based machine learning and deep learning-based methods in the prediction of tumor grade in meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于影像组学的机器学习和深度学习方法在预测脑膜瘤肿瘤分级中的性能:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Jan 24;48(1):78. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03236-3.
5
A systematic review of radiological prediction of ki 67 proliferation index of meningioma.脑膜瘤Ki-67增殖指数的放射学预测的系统评价。
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Dec 2;47(1):881. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-03074-9.
基于增强 WI 图像的脑膜瘤分级预测放射组学列线图
Br J Radiol. 2022 Sep 1;95(1137):20220141. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220141. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
4
Machine Learning Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomic Feature Analysis to Predict Ki-67 in World Health Organization Grade I Meningiomas.基于多参数磁共振成像放射组学特征分析的机器学习预测世界卫生组织一级脑膜瘤的 Ki-67 指数。
Neurosurgery. 2021 Oct 13;89(5):928-936. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyab307.
5
The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary.2021 年世卫组织中枢神经系统肿瘤分类:概述。
Neuro Oncol. 2021 Aug 2;23(8):1231-1251. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab106.
6
EANO guideline on the diagnosis and management of meningiomas.EANO 指南:脑膜瘤的诊断与管理。
Neuro Oncol. 2021 Nov 2;23(11):1821-1834. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab150.
7
Meningioma: A Review of Epidemiology, Pathology, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Future Directions.脑膜瘤:流行病学、病理学、诊断、治疗及未来方向综述
Biomedicines. 2021 Mar 21;9(3):319. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9030319.
8
Resected WHO grade I meningioma and predictors of local control.切除的世界卫生组织一级脑膜瘤及局部控制的预测因素。
J Neurooncol. 2021 Mar;152(1):145-151. doi: 10.1007/s11060-020-03688-1. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
9
Meningiomas: Preoperative predictive histopathological grading based on radiomics of MRI.脑膜瘤:基于 MRI 影像组学的术前预测性组织病理学分级。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Apr;77:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2020.11.009. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
10
The Current State of Radiomics for Meningiomas: Promises and Challenges.脑膜瘤的影像组学现状:前景与挑战
Front Oncol. 2020 Oct 27;10:567736. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.567736. eCollection 2020.