• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于双参数MRI的影像组学分类器用于检测血清前列腺特异抗原(PSA)水平为4至10 ng/mL的前列腺癌患者。

Biparametric MRI-based radiomics classifiers for the detection of prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10 ng/mL.

作者信息

Lu Yangbai, Li Binfei, Huang Hongxing, Leng Qu, Wang Qiang, Zhong Rui, Huang Yaqiang, Li Canyong, Yuan Runqiang, Zhang Yongxin

机构信息

Department of Urology, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China.

Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2022 Dec 5;12:1020317. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1020317. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2022.1020317
PMID:36582803
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9793773/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the predictive performance of the combined model by integrating clinical variables and radiomic features for the accurate detection of prostate cancer (PCa) in patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) serum levels of 4-10 ng/mL.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 136 males (mean age, 67.3 ± 8.4 years) with Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v2.1 category ≤3 lesions and PSA serum levels of 4-10 ng/mL were performed. All patients underwent multiparametric MRI at 3.0T and transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy in their clinical workup. Radiomic features were extracted from axial T2-weighted images (T2WI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps of each patient using PyRadiomics. Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) and recursive feature elimination (RFE) were implemented to identify the most significant radiomic features. Independent clinic-radiological factors were identified univariate and multivariate regression analyses. Seven machine-learning algorithms were compared to construct a single-layered radiomic score (ie, radscore) and multivariate regression analysis was applied to construct the fusion radscore. Finally, the radiomic nomogram was further developed by integrating useful clinic-radiological factors and fusion radscore using multivariate regression analysis. The discriminative power of the nomogram was evaluated by area under the curve (AUC), DeLong test, calibration curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), and clinical impact curve (CIC).

RESULTS

The transitional zone-specific antigen density was identified as the only independent clinic-radiological factor, which yielded an AUC of 0.592 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.527-0.657). The ADC radscore based on six features and Naive Bayes achieved an AUC of 0.779 (95%CI: 0.730-0.828); the T2WI radscore based on 13 features and Support Vector Machine yielded an AUC of 0.808 (95%CI: 0.761-0.855). The fusion radscore obtained an improved AUC of 0.844 (95%CI: 0.801-0.887), which was higher than the single-layered radscores (both P<0.05). The radiomic nomogram achieved the highest value among all models (all P<0.05), with an AUC of 0.872 (95%CI: 0.835-0.909). Calibration curve showed good agreement and DCA together with CIC confirmed the clinical benefits of the radiomic nomogram.

CONCLUSION

The radiomic nomogram holds the potential for accurate and noninvasive identification of PCa in patients with PI-RADS ≤3 lesions and PSA of 4-10 ng/mL, which could reduce unnecessary biopsy.

摘要

目的

通过整合临床变量和影像组学特征,研究联合模型对前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)血清水平为4 - 10 ng/mL的患者中前列腺癌(PCa)的准确检测的预测性能。

方法

对136例男性(平均年龄67.3±8.4岁)进行回顾性研究,这些患者的前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)v2.1类别≤3级病变且PSA血清水平为4 - 10 ng/mL。所有患者在临床检查中均接受了3.0T多参数MRI和经直肠超声引导下的系统性前列腺穿刺活检。使用PyRadiomics从每位患者的轴向T2加权图像(T2WI)和表观扩散系数(ADC)图中提取影像组学特征。采用Pearson相关系数(PCC)和递归特征消除(RFE)来识别最显著的影像组学特征。通过单因素和多因素回归分析确定独立的临床-放射学因素。比较七种机器学习算法以构建单层影像组学评分(即radscore),并应用多因素回归分析构建融合radscore。最后,通过多因素回归分析整合有用的临床-放射学因素和融合radscore,进一步开发影像组学列线图。通过曲线下面积(AUC)、DeLong检验、校准曲线、决策曲线分析(DCA)和临床影响曲线(CIC)评估列线图的判别能力。

结果

移行区特异性抗原密度被确定为唯一的独立临床-放射学因素,其AUC为0.592(95%置信区间[CI]:0.527 - 0.657)。基于六个特征和朴素贝叶斯的ADC radscore的AUC为0.779(95%CI:0.730 - 0.828);基于13个特征和支持向量机的T2WI radscore的AUC为0.808(95%CI:0.761 - 0.855)。融合radscore的AUC提高到0.844(95%CI:0.801 - 0.887),高于单层radscore(均P<0.05)。影像组学列线图在所有模型中具有最高值(均P<0.05),AUC为0.872(95%CI:0.835 - 0.909)。校准曲线显示出良好的一致性,DCA和CIC共同证实了影像组学列线图的临床益处。

结论

影像组学列线图具有准确、无创识别PI-RADS≤3级病变且PSA为4 - 10 ng/mL的患者中PCa的潜力,这可以减少不必要的活检。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e37/9793773/c3f13c01b4a8/fonc-12-1020317-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e37/9793773/3e404ef84373/fonc-12-1020317-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e37/9793773/108492d4ab2f/fonc-12-1020317-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e37/9793773/08f8f25afbcd/fonc-12-1020317-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e37/9793773/4c14515e3efc/fonc-12-1020317-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e37/9793773/c3f13c01b4a8/fonc-12-1020317-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e37/9793773/3e404ef84373/fonc-12-1020317-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e37/9793773/108492d4ab2f/fonc-12-1020317-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e37/9793773/08f8f25afbcd/fonc-12-1020317-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e37/9793773/4c14515e3efc/fonc-12-1020317-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e37/9793773/c3f13c01b4a8/fonc-12-1020317-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Biparametric MRI-based radiomics classifiers for the detection of prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10 ng/mL.基于双参数MRI的影像组学分类器用于检测血清前列腺特异抗原(PSA)水平为4至10 ng/mL的前列腺癌患者。
Front Oncol. 2022 Dec 5;12:1020317. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1020317. eCollection 2022.
2
Utility of Clinical-Radiomic Model to Identify Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Biparametric MRI PI-RADS V2.1 Category 3 Lesions.临床影像组学模型在双参数MRI的PI-RADS V2.1 3类病变中识别具有临床意义的前列腺癌的效用
Front Oncol. 2022 Feb 24;12:840786. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.840786. eCollection 2022.
3
MRI-Based Radiomics Nomogram for Predicting Prostate Cancer with Gray-Zone Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels to Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies.基于MRI的影像组学列线图用于预测处于前列腺特异性抗原灰色区域水平的前列腺癌,以减少不必要的活检。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Dec 1;12(12):3005. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12123005.
4
MRI-Based Surrogate Imaging Markers of Aggressiveness in Prostate Cancer: Development of a Machine Learning Model Based on Radiomic Features.基于MRI的前列腺癌侵袭性替代成像标志物:基于放射组学特征的机器学习模型的开发
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Aug 28;13(17):2779. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13172779.
5
Utility of machine learning of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and T2-weighted (T2W) radiomic features in PI-RADS version 2.1 category 3 lesions to predict prostate cancer diagnosis.基于表观扩散系数(ADC)和 T2 加权(T2W)影像组学特征的机器学习在 PI-RADS 版本 2.1 分类 3 病变中预测前列腺癌诊断的效用。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Dec;46(12):5647-5658. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03235-0. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
6
Multiparametric MRI-Based Radiomics for Prostate Cancer Screening With PSA in 4-10 ng/mL to Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies.基于多参数磁共振成像的影像组学用于血清前列腺特异抗原水平在4至10 ng/mL之间的前列腺癌筛查以减少不必要的活检
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Jun;51(6):1890-1899. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27008. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
7
Prostate Cancer Differentiation and Aggressiveness: Assessment With a Radiomic-Based Model vs. PI-RADS v2.前列腺癌分化与侵袭性:基于放射组学模型与 PI-RADS v2 评估的比较
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Mar;49(3):875-884. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26243. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
8
MRI-based multiregional radiomics for predicting lymph nodes status and prognosis in patients with resectable rectal cancer.基于磁共振成像的多区域影像组学预测可切除直肠癌患者的淋巴结状态及预后
Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 4;12:1087882. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1087882. eCollection 2022.
9
Development and Validation of a Radiomics Nomogram for Predicting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in PI-RADS 3 Lesions.用于预测PI-RADS 3类病变中具有临床意义的前列腺癌的影像组学列线图的开发与验证
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 26;11:825429. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.825429. eCollection 2021.
10
Development of a nomogram combining multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and PSA-related parameters to enhance the detection of clinically significant cancer across different region.开发一种结合多参数磁共振成像和前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)相关参数的列线图,以提高不同区域临床显著性癌症的检测率。
Prostate. 2022 Apr;82(5):556-565. doi: 10.1002/pros.24302. Epub 2022 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Radiomic Analysis and Different Machine Learning Models in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.放射组学分析及不同机器学习模型在前列腺癌诊断中的作用
J Imaging. 2025 Jul 23;11(8):250. doi: 10.3390/jimaging11080250.
2
Clinical-radiomics hybrid modeling outperforms conventional models: machine learning enhances stratification of adverse prognostic features in prostate cancer.临床放射组学混合模型优于传统模型:机器学习增强了前列腺癌不良预后特征的分层。
Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 6;15:1625158. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1625158. eCollection 2025.
3
Predicting clinically significant prostate cancer in PI-RADS 3 lesions using MRI-based radiomics: a literature review of methodological variations and performance.

本文引用的文献

1
Inter-reader agreement of the prostate imaging reporting and data system version v2.1 for detection of prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.前列腺影像报告和数据系统v2.1版在前列腺癌检测方面的阅片者间一致性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 29;12:1013941. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1013941. eCollection 2022.
2
Prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer with a multimodal MRI-based radiomics nomogram.基于多模态磁共振成像的影像组学列线图预测具有临床意义的前列腺癌
Front Oncol. 2022 Jul 15;12:918830. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.918830. eCollection 2022.
3
Emerging MR methods for improved diagnosis of prostate cancer by multiparametric MRI.
使用基于MRI的放射组学预测PI-RADS 3类病变中具有临床意义的前列腺癌:方法学差异与性能的文献综述
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Apr 2. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-04914-y.
4
Comparison in prostate cancer diagnosis with PSA 4-10 ng/mL: radiomics-based model VS. PI-RADS v2.1.在 PSA 4-10ng/mL 范围内的前列腺癌诊断中比较:基于放射组学的模型与 PI-RADS v2.1。
BMC Urol. 2024 Oct 23;24(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01625-2.
5
Radiomic Pipelines for Prostate Cancer in External Beam Radiation Therapy: A Review of Methods and Future Directions.适形调强放疗中前列腺癌的影像组学流程:方法与未来方向综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 3;13(13):3907. doi: 10.3390/jcm13133907.
6
MRI-based machine learning models predict the malignant biological behavior of meningioma.基于 MRI 的机器学习模型预测脑膜瘤的恶性生物学行为。
BMC Med Imaging. 2023 Sep 27;23(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12880-023-01101-7.
7
Predicting prostate cancer in men with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/mL: MRI-based radiomics can help junior radiologists improve the diagnostic performance.预测 PSA 水平在 4-10ng/mL 之间的男性前列腺癌:基于 MRI 的放射组学有助于初级放射科医生提高诊断性能。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 24;13(1):4846. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31869-1.
新兴的磁共振方法通过多参数 MRI 提高前列腺癌的诊断准确性。
MAGMA. 2022 Aug;35(4):587-608. doi: 10.1007/s10334-022-01031-5. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
4
Evaluation of the Efficiency of MRI-Based Radiomics Classifiers in the Diagnosis of Prostate Lesions.基于磁共振成像的放射组学分类器在前列腺病变诊断中的效率评估
Front Oncol. 2022 Jul 5;12:934108. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.934108. eCollection 2022.
5
Avoiding Unnecessary Systematic Biopsy in Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Comparison Between MRI-Based Radiomics Model and PI-RADS Category.避免在具有临床意义的前列腺癌中进行不必要的系统活检:基于MRI的放射组学模型与PI-RADS类别之间的比较
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2023 Feb;57(2):578-586. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28333. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
6
A narrative review of biparametric MRI (bpMRI) implementation on screening, detection, and the overall accuracy for prostate cancer.关于双参数磁共振成像(bpMRI)在前列腺癌筛查、检测及总体准确性方面应用的叙述性综述。
Ther Adv Urol. 2022 May 4;14:17562872221096377. doi: 10.1177/17562872221096377. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
7
Application Value of Radiomic Nomogram in the Differential Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer and Hyperplasia.影像组学列线图在前列腺癌与增生鉴别诊断中的应用价值
Front Oncol. 2022 Apr 14;12:859625. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.859625. eCollection 2022.
8
Classification of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Multi-Parametric MRI: A Validation Study Comparing Deep Learning and Radiomics.多参数磁共振成像上临床显著前列腺癌的分类:一项比较深度学习和放射组学的验证研究
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Dec 21;14(1):12. doi: 10.3390/cancers14010012.
9
Can machine learning-based analysis of multiparameter MRI and clinical parameters improve the performance of clinically significant prostate cancer diagnosis?基于机器学习的多参数 MRI 和临床参数分析能否提高临床显著前列腺癌诊断的性能?
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2021 Dec;16(12):2235-2249. doi: 10.1007/s11548-021-02507-w. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
10
Utility of machine learning of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and T2-weighted (T2W) radiomic features in PI-RADS version 2.1 category 3 lesions to predict prostate cancer diagnosis.基于表观扩散系数(ADC)和 T2 加权(T2W)影像组学特征的机器学习在 PI-RADS 版本 2.1 分类 3 病变中预测前列腺癌诊断的效用。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Dec;46(12):5647-5658. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03235-0. Epub 2021 Aug 31.