Bauer G
Wien Med Wochenschr. 1986 Jul 31;136(14):357-65.
Procuring death is in the borderline area between life and death. Nowadays there is general agreement on the validity of the formula that the physician shall not be instrumental in inducing death but only in easing the process of dying. From the medico-legal point of view the problems must be treated in relation to the provisions of criminal law which constitute the physician's legistic field of tension in the situations at issue. From these passages of law emerge some basic principles to be observed by the physician when having to take decisions in borderline cases between life and death. Ranking first is the general prohibition on homicide, which includes the killing of another person at this person's own request as defined in section 77 and aiding and abetting suicide as defined in section 78 of the Austrian penal code. All of these are cases of objective crime, so that in each case the causal connection between the physician's death has to be established. According to Austrian jurisdiction a person incapable of living just as a person dying qualifies as object of homicide. In addition section 78 of the Austrian penal code prohibits any form of participation in suicide.
促成死亡处于生死边缘地带。如今,对于医生不应促成死亡而只能缓解死亡过程这一准则的有效性已达成普遍共识。从法医学角度来看,这些问题必须依据刑法规定来处理,而刑法规定在相关情形中构成了医生的法定紧张领域。从这些法律条文可以得出医生在生死边缘案件中做决策时必须遵守的一些基本原则。首要的是一般的杀人禁令,这包括奥地利刑法典第77条所定义的应他人请求杀害他人以及第78条所定义的协助自杀。所有这些都是客观犯罪情形,所以在每种情况下都必须确定医生行为与死亡之间的因果关系。根据奥地利的司法管辖权,一个无法存活的人如同一个濒死之人一样被视为杀人对象。此外,奥地利刑法典第78条禁止任何形式的参与自杀行为。