Cash Jasmine J, Bowden Mark G, Boan Andrea D, McTeague Lisa M, Kindred John H
Department of Health Sciences and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Department of Clinical Integration and Research, Brooks Rehabilitation, Jacksonville, FL 32216, USA.
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 15;12(18):5993. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185993.
The purpose of this investigation was to elucidate the relationship between the resting motor threshold (rMT) and active motor threshold (aMT). A cross-sectional comparison of MTs measured at four states of lower extremity muscle activation was conducted: resting, 5% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), 10%MVC, and standing. MTs were measured at the tibialis anterior in the ipsilesional and contralesional limbs in participants in the chronic phase (>6 months) of stroke ( = 11) and in the dominant limb of healthy controls ( = 11). To compare across activation levels, the responses were standardized using averaged peak-to-peak background electromyography (EMG) activity measured at 10%MVC + 2SD for each participant, in addition to the traditional 0.05 mV criterion for rMT (rMT). In all participants, as muscle activation increased, the least square mean estimates of MTs decreased (contralesional: = 0.008; ipsilesional: = 0.0015, healthy dominant: < 0.0001). In healthy controls, rMT was significantly different from all other MTs ( < 0.0344), while in stroke, there were no differences in either limb ( > 0.10). This investigation highlights the relationship between rMT and aMTs, which is important as many stroke survivors do not present with an rMT, necessitating the use of an aMT. Future works may consider the use of the standardized criterion that accounted for background EMG activity across activation levels.
本研究的目的是阐明静息运动阈值(rMT)与主动运动阈值(aMT)之间的关系。我们对下肢肌肉在四种激活状态下测得的运动阈值进行了横断面比较:静息、5%最大自主收缩(MVC)、10%MVC和站立。在中风慢性期(>6个月)的参与者(n = 11)的患侧和健侧肢体的胫前肌以及健康对照组(n = 11)优势肢体的胫前肌测量运动阈值。为了在不同激活水平之间进行比较,除了传统的rMT的0.05 mV标准外,还使用每个参与者在10%MVC + 2SD时测得的平均峰峰值背景肌电图(EMG)活动对反应进行标准化。在所有参与者中,随着肌肉激活增加,运动阈值的最小二乘均值估计值下降(健侧:P = 0.008;患侧:P = 0.0015,健康优势侧:P < 0.0001)。在健康对照组中,rMT与所有其他运动阈值均有显著差异(P < 第344页),而在中风患者中,两侧肢体均无差异(P > 0.10)。本研究突出了rMT与aMT之间的关系,这一点很重要,因为许多中风幸存者没有rMT,因此需要使用aMT。未来的研究可能会考虑使用考虑跨激活水平背景EMG活动的标准化标准。