Szotek Michał, Drużbicki Łukasz, Sabatowski Karol, Amoroso Gisella R, De Schouwer Koen, Matusik Paweł T
Department of Electrocardiology, The John Paul II Hospital, 80 Prądnicka St., 31-202 Kraków, Poland.
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantology, The John Paul II Hospital, 80 Prądnicka St., 31-202 Kraków, Poland.
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 19;12(18):6056. doi: 10.3390/jcm12186056.
Over the last decades, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) or replacement (TAVR) has become a potential, widely accepted, and effective method of treating aortic stenosis in patients at moderate and high surgical risk and those disqualified from surgery. The method evolved what translates into a noticeable decrease in the incidence of complications and more beneficial clinical outcomes. However, the incidence of conduction abnormalities related to TAVI, including left bundle branch block and complete or second-degree atrioventricular block (AVB), remains high. The occurrence of AVB requiring permanent pacemaker implantation is associated with a worse prognosis in this group of patients. The identification of risk factors for conduction disturbances requiring pacemaker placement and the assessment of their relation to pacing dependence may help to develop methods of optimal care, including preventive measures, for patients undergoing TAVI. This approach is crucial given the emerging evidence of no worse outcomes for intermediate and low-risk patients undergoing TAVI in comparison to surgical aortic valve replacement. This paper comprehensively discusses the mechanisms, risk factors, and consequences of conduction abnormalities and arrhythmias, including AVB, atrial fibrillation, and ventricular arrhythmias associated with aortic stenosis and TAVI, as well as provides insights into optimized patient care, along with the potential of conduction system pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy, to minimize the risk of unfavorable clinical outcomes.
在过去几十年中,经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)或置换术(TAVR)已成为治疗中、高手术风险以及不适合手术的主动脉瓣狭窄患者的一种潜在、广泛接受且有效的方法。该方法不断发展,并发症发生率显著降低,临床结局更有益。然而,与TAVI相关的传导异常发生率,包括左束支传导阻滞和完全性或二度房室传导阻滞(AVB),仍然很高。在这类患者中,需要植入永久起搏器的AVB的发生与更差的预后相关。识别需要放置起搏器的传导障碍的危险因素并评估它们与起搏依赖的关系,可能有助于为接受TAVI的患者制定最佳护理方法,包括预防措施。鉴于有新证据表明,与外科主动脉瓣置换术相比,中低风险患者接受TAVI的结局并不更差,这种方法至关重要。本文全面讨论了传导异常和心律失常的机制、危险因素及后果,包括与主动脉瓣狭窄和TAVI相关的AVB、心房颤动和室性心律失常,同时还深入探讨了优化患者护理的方法,以及传导系统起搏和心脏再同步治疗降低不良临床结局风险的潜力。