• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Dignity as a Central Issue in Treating Patients with Dementia Associated with COVID-19 Infection.尊严:新冠感染相关性痴呆患者治疗的核心问题
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Sep 1;59(9):1588. doi: 10.3390/medicina59091588.
2
Dignity-preserving dementia care: a metasynthesis.维护尊严的痴呆症护理:一项综合分析。
Nurs Ethics. 2013 Dec;20(8):861-80. doi: 10.1177/0969733013485110. Epub 2013 May 28.
3
Dignity in people with dementia: A concept analysis.痴呆患者的尊严:概念分析。
Nurs Ethics. 2024 Nov;31(7):1220-1232. doi: 10.1177/09697330241262469. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
4
Ethical care during COVID-19 for care home residents with dementia.COVID-19 期间对养老院痴呆症患者的伦理关怀。
Nurs Ethics. 2021 Feb;28(1):46-57. doi: 10.1177/0969733020976194. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
5
Dignity, Autonomy, and Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources During COVID-19.新冠疫情期间的尊严、自主和稀缺医疗资源的分配。
J Bioeth Inq. 2020 Dec;17(4):691-696. doi: 10.1007/s11673-020-09998-3. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
6
Relational interactions preserving dignity experience: Perceptions of persons living with dementia.维护尊严体验的关系互动:痴呆症患者的认知
Nurs Ethics. 2015 Aug;22(5):577-93. doi: 10.1177/0969733014549882. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
7
Dignity at stake: Caring for persons with impaired autonomy.尊严面临威胁:关爱自主性受损的人。
Nurs Ethics. 2020 Feb;27(1):104-115. doi: 10.1177/0969733019845128. Epub 2019 May 19.
8
Human Dignity as Leading Principle in Public Health Ethics: A Multi-Case Analysis of 21st Century German Health Policy Decisions.人的尊严作为公共卫生伦理的主导原则:对 21 世纪德国卫生政策决策的多案例分析。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Mar 1;7(3):210-224. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.67.
9
Appealing to Tacit Knowledge and Axiology to Enhance Medical Practice in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Hermeneutic Bioethical Analysis.呼吁利用隐性知识和价值论增强 COVID-19 大流行中的医疗实践:系统评价和解释学生命伦理学分析。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 8;9:686773. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.686773. eCollection 2021.
10
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Vaccine access, equity and justice: COVID-19 vaccines and vaccination.疫苗的可及性、公平性和正义:COVID-19 疫苗和接种。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Jun;8(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-011881.
2
Psychological Resilience, Anxiety, and Well-Being of Health Care Providers During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间医护人员的心理韧性、焦虑与幸福感
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 May 12;16:1327-1335. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S403681. eCollection 2023.
3
The Effects of SARS-CoV-2 Infection on the Cognitive Functioning of Patients with Pre-Existing Dementia.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染对已患痴呆症患者认知功能的影响
J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2023 Feb 14;7(1):119-128. doi: 10.3233/ADR-220090. eCollection 2023.
4
Laboratory Findings and Clinical Outcomes of ICU-admitted COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Assessment of Particularities Identified among Romanian Minorities.入住重症监护病房的新冠病毒肺炎患者的实验室检查结果及临床结局:对罗马尼亚少数民族中发现的特殊性进行的回顾性评估
J Pers Med. 2023 Jan 21;13(2):195. doi: 10.3390/jpm13020195.
5
Dementia and COVID-19 among Older African American Adults: A Scoping Review of Healthcare Access and Resources.老年非裔美国人的痴呆症和 COVID-19:医疗保健机会和资源的范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 16;20(4):3494. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043494.
6
Behavioral symptoms, depression symptoms, and medication use in Michigan nursing home residents with dementia during COVID-19.密歇根州养老院痴呆症居民在 COVID-19 期间的行为症状、抑郁症状和药物使用情况。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Feb;71(2):414-422. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18116. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
7
Chemical and physical restraint use during acute care hospitalization of older adults: A retrospective cohort study and time series analysis.老年人急性住院期间使用化学和身体约束:回顾性队列研究和时间序列分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 26;17(10):e0276504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276504. eCollection 2022.
8
Long-term neurologic outcomes of COVID-19.COVID-19 的长期神经系统预后。
Nat Med. 2022 Nov;28(11):2406-2415. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-02001-z. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
9
Subtle vascular and astrocytic changes in the brain of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.新型冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)患者脑部细微的血管和星形胶质细胞变化。
Eur J Neurol. 2022 Dec;29(12):3676-3692. doi: 10.1111/ene.15545. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
10
Neurological and psychiatric risk trajectories after SARS-CoV-2 infection: an analysis of 2-year retrospective cohort studies including 1 284 437 patients.SARS-CoV-2 感染后神经和精神风险轨迹:包括 1284437 名患者的 2 年回顾性队列研究分析。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Oct;9(10):815-827. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00260-7. Epub 2022 Aug 17.

尊严:新冠感染相关性痴呆患者治疗的核心问题

Dignity as a Central Issue in Treating Patients with Dementia Associated with COVID-19 Infection.

机构信息

Department of Legal Medicine and Bioethics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.

Medical Clinical Department, Dunărea de Jos University, 800201 Galați, Romania.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Sep 1;59(9):1588. doi: 10.3390/medicina59091588.

DOI:10.3390/medicina59091588
PMID:37763707
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10537082/
Abstract

COVID-19 was initially considered a primary respiratory disorder associated with various short- and long-term complications, affecting many patients and imposing a significant burden. Patients who have dementia are especially vulnerable to the SARS-CoV2 infection, which is associated with an increased risk for neuropsychiatric complications. These patients need a unique approach to managing ethical issues related to the COVID-19 pandemic, including autonomy, veracity, non-maleficence, justice, compassion, and dignity. The latter is one of the most elusive and misunderstood concepts in medical ethics and is extremely important in debates surrounding the proper management of patients with dementia. However, it is often left out of ethical analysis, as most clinicians, when debating issues associated with clinical practice, often evaluate only the "classical" principles of biomedical ethics. In this article, we aim to assess the unique features of dignity in treating this group of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. We will briefly analyze dignity as a bioethical concept. We will further explore its principal axes, namely compassion, creating a humane and purposeful environment, employing persuasion to meet the person's essential needs, exerting a certain degree of mild restraint to meet the person's critical needs, minimizing harm in terminal care, and justice, through the lens of people who had dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Applying this principle in clinical practice requires significant commitment from all healthcare workers. New approaches to the analysis of dignity, such as through the Ring Theory of Personhood, may facilitate its understanding by practitioners and aid its implementation in populations with multiple vulnerabilities, such as dementia patients, during an infectious outbreak that generates significant social and medical changes.

摘要

COVID-19 最初被认为是一种主要的呼吸道疾病,与各种短期和长期并发症有关,影响许多患者并带来巨大负担。患有痴呆症的患者特别容易感染 SARS-CoV2,这与神经精神并发症的风险增加有关。这些患者需要一种独特的方法来处理与 COVID-19 大流行相关的伦理问题,包括自主性、真实性、不伤害、正义、同情和尊严。尊严是医学伦理学中最难以捉摸和误解的概念之一,在围绕适当管理痴呆症患者的辩论中极其重要。然而,它经常被排除在伦理分析之外,因为大多数临床医生在辩论与临床实践相关的问题时,通常只评估生物医学伦理的“经典”原则。在本文中,我们旨在评估在 COVID-19 大流行期间治疗这组患者时尊严的独特特征。我们将简要分析尊严作为一个生物伦理概念。我们将进一步探讨其主要轴,即同情、创造一个人道和有目的的环境、运用说服来满足人的基本需求、在满足人的关键需求时施加一定程度的温和约束、在临终关怀中最大限度地减少伤害,以及正义,通过 COVID-19 大流行期间患有痴呆症的人的视角。将这一原则应用于临床实践需要所有医疗保健工作者的巨大承诺。通过人格的环理论等新的尊严分析方法,可能有助于从业者理解它,并在面临重大社会和医疗变革的易受感染人群中,如痴呆症患者,实施它。