Department of Legal Medicine and Bioethics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Medical Clinical Department, Dunărea de Jos University, 800201 Galați, Romania.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Sep 1;59(9):1588. doi: 10.3390/medicina59091588.
COVID-19 was initially considered a primary respiratory disorder associated with various short- and long-term complications, affecting many patients and imposing a significant burden. Patients who have dementia are especially vulnerable to the SARS-CoV2 infection, which is associated with an increased risk for neuropsychiatric complications. These patients need a unique approach to managing ethical issues related to the COVID-19 pandemic, including autonomy, veracity, non-maleficence, justice, compassion, and dignity. The latter is one of the most elusive and misunderstood concepts in medical ethics and is extremely important in debates surrounding the proper management of patients with dementia. However, it is often left out of ethical analysis, as most clinicians, when debating issues associated with clinical practice, often evaluate only the "classical" principles of biomedical ethics. In this article, we aim to assess the unique features of dignity in treating this group of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. We will briefly analyze dignity as a bioethical concept. We will further explore its principal axes, namely compassion, creating a humane and purposeful environment, employing persuasion to meet the person's essential needs, exerting a certain degree of mild restraint to meet the person's critical needs, minimizing harm in terminal care, and justice, through the lens of people who had dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Applying this principle in clinical practice requires significant commitment from all healthcare workers. New approaches to the analysis of dignity, such as through the Ring Theory of Personhood, may facilitate its understanding by practitioners and aid its implementation in populations with multiple vulnerabilities, such as dementia patients, during an infectious outbreak that generates significant social and medical changes.
COVID-19 最初被认为是一种主要的呼吸道疾病,与各种短期和长期并发症有关,影响许多患者并带来巨大负担。患有痴呆症的患者特别容易感染 SARS-CoV2,这与神经精神并发症的风险增加有关。这些患者需要一种独特的方法来处理与 COVID-19 大流行相关的伦理问题,包括自主性、真实性、不伤害、正义、同情和尊严。尊严是医学伦理学中最难以捉摸和误解的概念之一,在围绕适当管理痴呆症患者的辩论中极其重要。然而,它经常被排除在伦理分析之外,因为大多数临床医生在辩论与临床实践相关的问题时,通常只评估生物医学伦理的“经典”原则。在本文中,我们旨在评估在 COVID-19 大流行期间治疗这组患者时尊严的独特特征。我们将简要分析尊严作为一个生物伦理概念。我们将进一步探讨其主要轴,即同情、创造一个人道和有目的的环境、运用说服来满足人的基本需求、在满足人的关键需求时施加一定程度的温和约束、在临终关怀中最大限度地减少伤害,以及正义,通过 COVID-19 大流行期间患有痴呆症的人的视角。将这一原则应用于临床实践需要所有医疗保健工作者的巨大承诺。通过人格的环理论等新的尊严分析方法,可能有助于从业者理解它,并在面临重大社会和医疗变革的易受感染人群中,如痴呆症患者,实施它。