• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

维护尊严的痴呆症护理:一项综合分析。

Dignity-preserving dementia care: a metasynthesis.

作者信息

Tranvåg Oscar, Petersen Karin A, Nåden Dagfinn

机构信息

University of Bergen, Norway; Oslo and Akershus University College, Norway.

出版信息

Nurs Ethics. 2013 Dec;20(8):861-80. doi: 10.1177/0969733013485110. Epub 2013 May 28.

DOI:10.1177/0969733013485110
PMID:23715554
Abstract

Research indicates the essentiality of dignity as a vital component for quality of life, reconfirming the emphasis on dignity preservation in the international code of nursing ethics. Applying Noblit and Hare's meta-ethnography, the aim of the study was to develop a theory model by synthesizing 10 qualitative articles from various cultural contexts, exploring nurse and allied healthcare professional perception/practice concerning dignity-preserving dementia care. "Advocating the person's autonomy and integrity," which involves "having compassion for the person," "confirming the person's worthiness and sense of self," and "creating a humane and purposeful environment," was identified as a primary foundation for dignity-preserving dementia care. "Balancing individual choices among persons no longer able to make sound decisions, against the duty of making choices on behalf of the person," which involves "persuasion" and/or "mild restraint," was considered a crucial aspect in certain situations. "Sheltering human worth-remembering those who forget" was identified as a comprehensive motive and core value within dignity-preserving dementia care.

摘要

研究表明尊严作为生活质量的重要组成部分至关重要,再次证实了国际护理伦理准则中对维护尊严的强调。运用诺布利特和黑尔的元民族志方法,该研究的目的是通过综合来自不同文化背景的10篇定性文章,构建一个理论模型,探索护士及相关医疗保健专业人员对维护尊严的痴呆症护理的认知/实践。“倡导人的自主性和完整性”,包括“对人有同情心”、“确认人的价值和自我意识”以及“营造一个人道且有意义的环境”,被确定为维护尊严的痴呆症护理的主要基础。“在无法做出合理决策的人之间平衡个人选择与代表其做出选择的责任”,包括“劝说”和/或“适度约束”,在某些情况下被视为关键方面。“守护人类价值——铭记那些遗忘的人”被确定为维护尊严的痴呆症护理中的一个全面动机和核心价值。

相似文献

1
Dignity-preserving dementia care: a metasynthesis.维护尊严的痴呆症护理:一项综合分析。
Nurs Ethics. 2013 Dec;20(8):861-80. doi: 10.1177/0969733013485110. Epub 2013 May 28.
2
Relational interactions preserving dignity experience: Perceptions of persons living with dementia.维护尊严体验的关系互动:痴呆症患者的认知
Nurs Ethics. 2015 Aug;22(5):577-93. doi: 10.1177/0969733014549882. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
3
Autonomy and dignity of patients with dementia: Perceptions of multicultural caretakers.痴呆症患者的自主性与尊严:多元文化护理者的认知
Nurs Ethics. 2018 Feb;25(1):37-53. doi: 10.1177/0969733016642625. Epub 2016 Apr 24.
4
Dignity work of older women caring for a husband with dementia at home.老年女性在家照顾患有痴呆症丈夫的尊严工作。
Health Care Women Int. 2019 Oct;40(10):1047-1069. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2019.1578780. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
5
Dignity as a Central Issue in Treating Patients with Dementia Associated with COVID-19 Infection.尊严:新冠感染相关性痴呆患者治疗的核心问题
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Sep 1;59(9):1588. doi: 10.3390/medicina59091588.
6
Human dignity and autonomy in the care for patients with dementia: differences among formal caretakers from various cultural backgrounds.在痴呆症患者护理中体现人的尊严和自主性:不同文化背景的正式照护者之间的差异。
Ethn Health. 2018 Feb;23(2):121-141. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2016.1246519. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
7
Patient Perspectives of Dignity, Autonomy and Control at the End of Life: Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography.患者对临终时尊严、自主性和控制权的看法:系统评价与元民族志研究
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 24;11(3):e0151435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151435. eCollection 2016.
8
Dignity in people with dementia: A concept analysis.痴呆患者的尊严:概念分析。
Nurs Ethics. 2024 Nov;31(7):1220-1232. doi: 10.1177/09697330241262469. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
9
'Like a prison without bars': dementia and experiences of dignity.“宛如没有栅栏的牢笼”:痴呆症与尊严体验
Nurs Ethics. 2013 Dec;20(8):881-92. doi: 10.1177/0969733013484484. Epub 2013 May 23.
10
Dignity and autonomy in the care for patients with dementia: Differences among formal caretakers of varied cultural backgrounds and their meaning.痴呆症患者护理中的尊严与自主权:不同文化背景的正式护理人员之间的差异及其意义。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2017 May-Jun;70:19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2016.12.003. Epub 2016 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Dignity-Preserving Dementia Care in Old Age Homes in Nepal: Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives.尼泊尔养老院中维护尊严的痴呆症护理:医疗保健专业人员的观点
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2025 Aug 27;12:23333936251369444. doi: 10.1177/23333936251369444. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Experiences of Older Mental Health Patients and Their Care Partners Using a Proxy Account to Access Open Notes: Qualitative Interview Study.老年心理健康患者及其护理伙伴使用代理账户访问开放病历的体验:定性访谈研究
JMIR Aging. 2025 Feb 24;8:e66690. doi: 10.2196/66690.
3
Social health markers in the context of cognitive decline and dementia: an international qualitative study.
认知衰退和痴呆背景下的社会健康指标:一项国际质性研究
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 19;15:1384636. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1384636. eCollection 2024.
4
Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on Dignity in Dementia: A Qualitative Analysis.医疗保健专业人员对痴呆症患者尊严的看法:一项定性分析。
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2024 Sep 3;11:23333936241278074. doi: 10.1177/23333936241278074. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
5
Ethical considerations for the use of anti-amyloid immunotherapy in patients with early Alzheimer's disease.在早期阿尔茨海默病患者中使用抗淀粉样蛋白免疫疗法的伦理考量
Alzheimers Dement. 2024 May;20(5):3664-3665. doi: 10.1002/alz.13795. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
6
A Principle-Based Approach to Visual Identification Systems for Hospitalized People with Dementia.基于原则的住院痴呆患者视觉识别系统方法。
J Bioeth Inq. 2024 Jun;21(2):331-344. doi: 10.1007/s11673-023-10315-x. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
7
Dignity as a Central Issue in Treating Patients with Dementia Associated with COVID-19 Infection.尊严:新冠感染相关性痴呆患者治疗的核心问题
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Sep 1;59(9):1588. doi: 10.3390/medicina59091588.
8
Considering management behaviours to identify vulnerable caregivers of persons with dementia.考虑管理行为,以确定痴呆症患者的弱势照顾者。
Psychogeriatrics. 2023 Jul;23(4):650-656. doi: 10.1111/psyg.12973. Epub 2023 May 5.
9
Do differences exist in cross-cultural caregivers' respect for the autonomy/dignity of people with dementia? Real-time field observations in nursing homes.跨文化护理员对痴呆症患者自主性/尊严的尊重是否存在差异?养老院的实时实地观察。
Dementia (London). 2023 Jul;22(5):935-963. doi: 10.1177/14713012231158410. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
10
Informal caregivers and assistive technology in Norwegian nursing homes.挪威养老院中的非正式照护者和辅助技术。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 4;17(10):e0275474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275474. eCollection 2022.