• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

职业治疗师评估横向捏力调制时的年龄相关认知偏差。

Age-Related Cognitive Bias in the Assessment of Lateral Pinch Modulation by Occupational Therapists.

机构信息

Hadassah Medical Center, Department of Physical Therapy, Jerusalem 9765418, Israel.

Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2023 Sep 8;23(18):7747. doi: 10.3390/s23187747.

DOI:10.3390/s23187747
PMID:37765804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10535652/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cognitive bias may appear in occupational therapists' interpretation of physical examinations. Since different strategies for decision making have been shown to reduce bias, its quantification is an essential first step towards awareness and bias reduction. Our aims: (1) quantify cognitive bias by testing the differences in occupational therapists' assessment of lateral pinch force modulation between young and older adults, and between women and men; and (2) to test for a correlation between the tendency to bypass an intuitive response and the degree of cognitive bias.

METHODS

Occupational therapists (n = 37; age 40.3 ± 11.4 years) used a visual analogue scale to rate pre-recorded simulations of the digital output of lateral pinch modulation videos of different levels of abilities coupled with videos of young/old men/woman pressing the force sensor. They filled out the Cognitive Reflection Test and the Rational-Experiential Inventory-40.

RESULTS

Subjects showed higher bias towards old individuals compared to young ones ( < 0.001), but with no sex bias ( = 0.119). Rational ability correlated with cognitive bias of assessment of lateral pinch modulation in old individuals (r = 0.537, < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Occupational therapists might underestimate the physical abilities of older adults. Biased evaluation might cause assignment of redundant exercises and therefore loss of time, effort, and resources.

摘要

背景

认知偏差可能出现在作业治疗师对体格检查的解释中。由于已经证明不同的决策策略可以减少偏差,因此量化认知偏差是提高意识和减少偏差的重要第一步。我们的目的是:(1)通过测试作业治疗师对年轻和老年成年人以及男女之间的侧捏力调制评估的差异,来量化认知偏差;(2)测试绕过直觉反应的倾向与认知偏差程度之间的相关性。

方法

作业治疗师(n = 37;年龄 40.3 ± 11.4 岁)使用视觉模拟量表对不同能力水平的侧捏调制视频的数字输出的预录制模拟进行评分,这些视频与年轻/老年男性/女性按压力传感器的视频相结合。他们填写了认知反射测试和理性-经验库存-40。

结果

与年轻人相比,受试者对老年人的偏见更高( < 0.001),但没有性别偏见( = 0.119)。理性能力与评估老年人侧捏调制的认知偏差相关(r = 0.537, < 0.001)。

讨论

作业治疗师可能低估了老年人的身体能力。有偏差的评估可能会导致分配冗余的练习,从而浪费时间、精力和资源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/226c/10535652/c4e5c3ba81bc/sensors-23-07747-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/226c/10535652/a9e9638f934b/sensors-23-07747-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/226c/10535652/91ef9edf158c/sensors-23-07747-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/226c/10535652/7f9d141bfb26/sensors-23-07747-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/226c/10535652/725d5376ce7a/sensors-23-07747-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/226c/10535652/c4e5c3ba81bc/sensors-23-07747-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/226c/10535652/a9e9638f934b/sensors-23-07747-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/226c/10535652/91ef9edf158c/sensors-23-07747-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/226c/10535652/7f9d141bfb26/sensors-23-07747-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/226c/10535652/725d5376ce7a/sensors-23-07747-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/226c/10535652/c4e5c3ba81bc/sensors-23-07747-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Age-Related Cognitive Bias in the Assessment of Lateral Pinch Modulation by Occupational Therapists.职业治疗师评估横向捏力调制时的年龄相关认知偏差。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Sep 8;23(18):7747. doi: 10.3390/s23187747.
2
A Survey of Occupational Therapy Practice in Beijing, China.中国北京职业治疗实践调查
Occup Ther Int. 2016 Jun;23(2):186-95. doi: 10.1002/oti.1423. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
3
Occupational Therapists' Perceived Confidence in the Management of Concussion: Implications for Occupational Therapy Education.职业治疗师对脑震荡管理的感知信心:对职业治疗教育的启示
Occup Ther Int. 2019 Feb 24;2019:9245153. doi: 10.1155/2019/9245153. eCollection 2019.
4
Therapists' experience of the cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance (CO-OP) approach: Shifting from conventional practice.治疗师对日常职业表现认知取向(CO-OP)方法的体验:从传统实践的转变。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2020 Feb;27(2):133-141. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2018.1483424. Epub 2018 Jul 8.
5
Clinical reasoning of occupational therapists in selecting activities together with older adults with dementia to postpone further development of cognitive decline.职业治疗师与患有痴呆症的老年人共同选择活动以延缓认知能力下降进一步发展的临床推理。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2023 Jan;30(1):98-108. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2022.2112282. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
6
Occupational Therapists' Views of Nussbaum's Life Capability: An Exploratory Study.职业治疗师对努斯鲍姆生活能力的看法:一项探索性研究。
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2015 Oct;35(4):239-49. doi: 10.1177/1539449215601010. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
7
Occupational Therapists With Oncology Exposure: Perceived Needs on Adults and Older Adults With Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairments.接触肿瘤学的职业治疗师:对患有癌症相关认知障碍的成年人和老年人的认知需求
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2017 Jul;37(3):149-154. doi: 10.1177/1539449217698105. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
8
Occupational Therapists' Perceptions of Online Competence Assessment and Evidence-Based Resources.职业治疗师对在线能力评估和循证资源的看法。
Am J Occup Ther. 2019 Mar/Apr;73(2):7302205090p1-7302205090p8. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2019.029322.
9
Occupational engagement of people living with a life-limiting illness: Occupational therapists' perceptions.患有生命受限疾病者的职业参与:职业治疗师的看法。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2019 Apr;66(2):145-153. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12557. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
10
Introducing robotic upper limb training into routine clinical practice for stroke survivors: Perceptions of occupational therapists and physiotherapists.将机器人上肢训练引入中风幸存者的常规临床实践:职业治疗师和物理治疗师的看法。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2019 Aug;66(4):530-538. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12594. Epub 2019 Jul 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Decision making biases in the allied health professions: A systematic scoping review.辅助卫生专业人员的决策偏差:系统范围综述。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 20;15(10):e0240716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240716. eCollection 2020.
2
The Biology of Sex and Sport.性与运动的生物学
JBJS Rev. 2020 Mar;8(3):e0140. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.19.00140.
3
Effect of Teaching Bayesian Methods Using Learning by Concept vs Learning by Example on Medical Students' Ability to Estimate Probability of a Diagnosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
使用概念学习与范例学习对比教学贝叶斯方法对医学生诊断概率估计能力的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1918023. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18023.
4
Emotions and performance in rugby.橄榄球运动中的情绪与表现
J Sport Health Sci. 2019 Nov;8(6):595-600. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2016.05.007. Epub 2016 May 25.
5
Exercise training in older adults, what effects on muscle force control? A systematic review of randomized clinical trials.老年人的运动训练,对肌肉力量控制有何影响?一项随机临床试验的系统评价。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2019 Jul-Aug;83:138-150. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
6
Cognitive bias in clinical medicine.临床医学中的认知偏差。
J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2018 Sep;48(3):225-232. doi: 10.4997/JRCPE.2018.306.
7
Measuring Up to Expectation: Cognitive Bias in Wrist Range-of-Motion Measurement.符合期望:腕关节活动范围测量中的认知偏差。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Dec;46(12):1037-1041. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.6845. Epub 2016 Oct 30.
8
Correlates of Gross Motor Competence in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.儿童和青少年粗大运动能力的相关因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sports Med. 2016 Nov;46(11):1663-1688. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0495-z.
9
Is it time for studying real-life debiasing? Evaluation of the effectiveness of an analogical intervention technique.是时候研究现实生活中的去偏误了吗?对一种类比干预技术有效性的评估。
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 4;6:1120. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01120. eCollection 2015.
10
Teaching about how doctors think: a longitudinal curriculum in cognitive bias and diagnostic error for residents.教授医生如何思考:针对住院医师的认知偏差和诊断错误的纵向课程。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Dec;22(12):1044-50. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001987. Epub 2013 Aug 16.