Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
E. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, Russia.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Dec;34(12):2472-2483. doi: 10.1111/jce.16081. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a pivotal part of ablative therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF). Currently, there are multiple techniques available to realize PVI, including: manual-guided cryoballoon (MAN-CB), manual-guided radiofrequency (MAN-RF), and robotic magnetic navigation-guided radiofrequency ablation (RMN-RF). There is a lack of large prospective trials comparing contemporary RMN-RF with the more conventional ablation techniques. This study prospectively compared three catheter ablation techniques as treatment of paroxysmal AF.
This multicenter, prospective study included patients with paroxysmal AF who underwent their first ablation procedure. Procedural parameters (including procedural efficiency), complication rates, and freedom of AF during 12-month follow-up, were compared between three study groups which were defined by the utilized ablation technique.
A total of 221 patients were included in this study. Total procedure time was significantly shorter in MAN-CB (78 ± 21 min) compared to MAN-RF (115 ± 41 min; p < .001) and compared to RMN-RF (129 ± 32 min; p < .001), whereas it was comparable between the two radiofrequency (RF) groups (p = .062). A 3% complication rate was observed, which was comparable between all groups. At 12-month follow-up, AF recurrence was observed in 40 patients (19%) and was significantly lower in the robotic group (MAN-CB 19 [24%], MAN-RF 16 [23%], RMN-RF 5 [8%] AF recurrences, p = .045) (multivariate hazard ratio of RMN-RF on AF recurrence 0.32, 95% confidence interval: 0.12-0.87, p = .026).
RMN-guided PVI results in high freedom of AF in patients with paroxysmal AF, when compared to cryoablation and manual RF ablation. Cryoablation remains the most time-efficient ablation technique, whereas RMN nowadays has comparable efficiency with manual RF ablation.
肺静脉隔离(PVI)是治疗心房颤动(AF)的消融治疗的关键部分。目前,有多种技术可实现 PVI,包括:手动引导冷冻球囊(MAN-CB)、手动引导射频(MAN-RF)和机器人磁导航引导射频消融(RMN-RF)。目前缺乏比较当代 RMN-RF 与更传统消融技术的大型前瞻性试验。本研究前瞻性比较了三种导管消融技术作为阵发性 AF 的治疗方法。
这项多中心前瞻性研究纳入了首次接受消融治疗的阵发性 AF 患者。比较了三组研究患者的消融技术,比较了三组患者的手术参数(包括手术效率)、并发症发生率和 12 个月随访期间的 AF 复发率。
本研究共纳入 221 例患者。MAN-CB(78±21 分钟)的总手术时间明显短于 MAN-RF(115±41 分钟;p<.001)和 RMN-RF(129±32 分钟;p<.001),而 MAN-RF 与 MAN-RF 两组之间的手术时间无显著差异(p=.062)。观察到 3%的并发症发生率,三组之间无显著差异。在 12 个月的随访中,40 例(19%)患者出现 AF 复发,机器人组的复发率明显较低(MAN-CB 19[24%],MAN-RF 16[23%],RMN-RF 5[8%])(RMN-RF 对 AF 复发的多变量危险比为 0.32,95%置信区间:0.12-0.87,p=0.026)。
与冷冻消融和手动 RF 消融相比,RMN 引导的 PVI 可使阵发性 AF 患者获得较高的 AF 复发率。冷冻消融仍然是最有效的消融技术,而 RMN 现在与手动 RF 消融的效率相当。