Suppr超能文献

护理专业学生中高保真模拟满意度量表简版的验证

Validation of a short version of the high-fidelity simulation satisfaction scale in nursing students.

作者信息

Martínez-Arce Alejandro, Rodríguez-Almagro Julián, Vélez-Vélez Esperanza, Rodríguez-Gómez Paloma, Tovar-Reinoso Alberto, Hernández-Martínez Antonio

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Fundación Jimenez Díaz School of Nursing- UAM, Madrid, Spain.

Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing of Ciudad Real, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain.

出版信息

BMC Nurs. 2023 Sep 28;22(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01515-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical simulation provides a practical and effective learning method during the undergraduate education of health professions. Currently there is only one validated scale in Spanish to assess nursing students' satisfaction with the use of high-fidelity simulation, therefore, our objective is to validate a brief version of this scale in undergraduate nursing students with or without clinical experience.

METHOD

A cross-sectional descriptive study was performed. Between 2018 and 2020, the students from all academic courses of the Fundación Jiménez Díaz nursing school completed the satisfaction scale at the end of their simulation experiences. To validate this scale, composed of 33 items and eight dimensions, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the principal components was performed, the internal consistency was studied using Cronbach's alpha, and the corrected item-test correlation of each of the items of the total scale was reviewed.

RESULTS

425 students completed the scale, after the exploratory factor analysis, a scale consisting of 25 items distributed into six subscales, each containing between two and six items, explained a variance of 66.5%. The KMO test (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) obtained a value of 0.938, Bartlett's sphericity test was < 0.01 and Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) was 0.991.

CONCLUSION

The modified ESSAF scale, reduced from 33 to 25 items and divided into six subscales, is as valid and reliable as the original scale for use in nursing students of different levels, with, or without clinical experience.

摘要

背景

临床模拟为卫生专业本科教育提供了一种实用且有效的学习方法。目前仅有一个经过验证的西班牙语量表用于评估护理专业学生对高保真模拟使用的满意度,因此,我们的目标是在有或无临床经验的本科护理专业学生中验证该量表的简版。

方法

进行了一项横断面描述性研究。在2018年至2020年期间,希门尼斯·迪亚斯基金会护理学院所有学术课程的学生在模拟体验结束时完成了满意度量表。为验证这个由33个项目和八个维度组成的量表,进行了主成分探索性因子分析(EFA),使用克朗巴哈系数研究内部一致性,并审查了总量表各项目的校正项目-测验相关性。

结果

425名学生完成了该量表,经过探索性因子分析后,一个由25个项目组成的量表分为六个子量表,每个子量表包含2至6个项目,解释了66.5%的方差。KMO检验(凯泽-迈耶-奥尔金检验)得到的值为0.938,巴特利特球形度检验<0.01,拟合优度指数(GFI)为0.991。

结论

修改后的ESSAF量表从33个项目减少到25个项目,并分为六个子量表,对于不同水平、有或无临床经验的护理专业学生来说,与原始量表一样有效且可靠。

相似文献

3
Developing an instrument to measure nursing students' attitudes towards nurses during clinical practice: A quantitative study.
Nurse Educ Pract. 2024 Oct;80:104127. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104127. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
4
Nursing students' Psychological Safety in High fidelity Simulations: Development of a new scale for psychometric evaluation.
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Oct;105:105017. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105017. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
7
Validation of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in an Indonesian population: a scale adaptation study.
Fam Med Community Health. 2023 Jun;11(2). doi: 10.1136/fmch-2022-001775.
8
"Clinical simulation as a learning tool in undergraduate nursing: Validation of a questionnaire".
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Apr;39:128-34. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.01.027. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
9
Development of Nutrition Literacy Scale for Middle School Students in Chongqing, China: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Front Nutr. 2022 May 20;9:888137. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.888137. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

2
Use of Simulation to Develop Teamwork Skills in Prelicensure Nursing Students: An Integrative Review.
Nurse Educ. 2019 Sep/Oct;44(5):E7-E11. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000616.
3
"Clinical simulation as a learning tool in undergraduate nursing: Validation of a questionnaire".
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Apr;39:128-34. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.01.027. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
4
INACSL Standards of Best Practice for Simulation: Past, Present, and Future.
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2015 Sep-Oct;36(5):294-8. doi: 10.5480/15-1670.
6
The effects of simulation-based learning using standardized patients in nursing students: A meta-analysis.
Nurse Educ Today. 2015 May;35(5):e6-e15. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.01.019. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
7
Theories and styles of debriefing: the good judgment method as a tool for formative assessment in healthcare.
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2015 Apr;68(4):282-5. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2014.05.018. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
9
High fidelity simulation in Spain: from dreams to reality.
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2015 Jan;62(1):18-28. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2014.05.008. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
10
A systematic review of the effectiveness of simulation debriefing in health professional education.
Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Jun;34(6):e58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.09.020. Epub 2013 Oct 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验