• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessing satisfaction in simulation among nursing students: psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience - Italian Version scale.评估护理专业学生对模拟教学的满意度:模拟体验满意度量表-意大利语版的心理测量特性
BMC Nurs. 2024 Apr 30;23(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01974-1.
2
The development and psychometric testing of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale.《模拟体验满意度量表的编制及心理测量学检验》。
Nurse Educ Today. 2011 Oct;31(7):705-10. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.01.004. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
3
Psychometric testing of the Norwegian version of the Simulation Design Scale, the Educational Practices Questionnaire and the Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale in nursing education.挪威版模拟设计量表、教育实践问卷以及护理教育中学习的学生满意度与自信心量表的心理测量测试。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2020 Oct 25;2:100012. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2020.100012. eCollection 2020 Nov.
4
Translation and validation of the Chinese version of the Friedman life balance scale among nursing students: A psychometric analysis.护理专业学生 Friedman 生活平衡量表中文版的翻译与验证:心理计量学分析。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Jan;66:103505. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103505. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
5
Validation of a short version of the high-fidelity simulation satisfaction scale in nursing students.护理专业学生中高保真模拟满意度量表简版的验证
BMC Nurs. 2023 Sep 28;22(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01515-2.
6
First Italian validation of the "Satisfaction with simulation experience" scale (SSE) for the evaluation of the learning experience through simulation.首次对“通过模拟评估学习体验的满意度”量表(SSE)进行意大利文验证。
Acta Biomed. 2021 Mar 31;92(S2):e2021002. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92iS2.11339.
7
Chinese version of the clinical supervision self-assessment tool: Assessment of reliability and validity.临床督导自我评估工具中文版:信效度评估
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Mar;98:104734. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104734. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
8
Nurse Competence Scale: psychometric assessment in the Italian context.护士能力量表:意大利背景下的心理测量评估
Ann Ig. 2018 Nov-Dec;30(6):458-469. doi: 10.7416/ai.2018.2246.
9
Nursing students' Psychological Safety in High fidelity Simulations: Development of a new scale for psychometric evaluation.护理专业学生在高仿真模拟中的心理安全感:心理测量评估新量表的开发。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Oct;105:105017. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105017. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
10
Development and psychometric testing of the satisfaction with Cultural Simulation Experience Scale.文化模拟体验量表满意度的编制与心理测量学测试
Nurse Educ Pract. 2015 Nov;15(6):530-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2015.07.009. Epub 2015 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric analysis of the Slovak version of the satisfaction with simulation experience scale (measurement invariance).斯洛伐克语版模拟体验满意度量表的心理测量分析(测量不变性)
Med Educ Online. 2025 Dec;30(1):2534055. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2025.2534055. Epub 2025 Jul 15.

本文引用的文献

1
The effectiveness of high-fidelity simulation methods to gain Foley catheterization knowledge, skills, satisfaction and self-confidence among novice nursing students: A randomized controlled trial.高保真模拟方法在新手护生中获取导尿知识、技能、满意度和自信心方面的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Nov;130:105952. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105952. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
2
Predictors of nursing student satisfaction as a key quality indicator of tertiary students' education experience: An integrative review.护理专业学生满意度的预测因素作为高等教育学生体验质量的关键指标:综合评价。
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Jul;126:105806. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105806. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
3
Is high-fidelity simulation-based training in emergency nursing effective in enhancing clinical decision-making skills? A mixed methods study.基于高保真模拟的急诊护理培训是否能有效提高临床决策技能?一项混合方法研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 May;69:103610. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103610. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
4
Performance effects of simulation training for medical students - a systematic review.模拟训练对医学生表现的影响——系统评价。
GMS J Med Educ. 2022 Nov 15;39(5):Doc51. doi: 10.3205/zma001572. eCollection 2022.
5
Simulation debriefing as part of simulation for clinical teaching and learning in nursing education: A scoping review.模拟讲评作为护理教育临床教学模拟的一部分:范围综述。
Nurs Open. 2023 Mar;10(3):1217-1233. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1426. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
6
Instrument development and psychometric testing in nursing education research.护理教育研究中的工具开发与心理测量测试。
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Dec;119:105603. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105603. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
7
Satisfaction evaluation for ACLS training.ACL 培训的满意度评估。
Acta Biomed. 2022 Jul 1;93(3):e2022260. doi: 10.23750/abm.v93i3.13337.
8
High-fidelity simulation duration and learning outcomes among undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review and meta-analysis.高保真模拟持续时间和本科护生学习成果之间的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Sep;116:105435. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105435. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
9
Learning effects of virtual versus high-fidelity simulations in nursing students: a crossover comparison.虚拟模拟与高保真模拟对护生的学习效果:一项交叉比较研究
BMC Nurs. 2022 Apr 27;21(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00878-2.
10
High-fidelity simulation in undergraduate nursing education: A meta-analysis.本科护理教育中的高保真模拟:一项荟萃分析。
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Apr;111:105291. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105291. Epub 2022 Feb 3.

评估护理专业学生对模拟教学的满意度:模拟体验满意度量表-意大利语版的心理测量特性

Assessing satisfaction in simulation among nursing students: psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience - Italian Version scale.

作者信息

Alberti Sara, Guasconi Massimo, Bolzoni Marina, Donnini Giulia, Volpi Paola, Rovesti Sergio, Monaco Federico, Bonacaro Antonio, Ferri Paola

机构信息

Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, str. Giuseppe Campi n° 287, Modena, 41125, Italy.

Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, via Gramsci n° 14, Parma, 43126, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Nurs. 2024 Apr 30;23(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01974-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12912-024-01974-1
PMID:38689264
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11061976/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Satisfaction with Simulation Experience scale is a 5-point Likert scale that measures students' satisfaction in medium and high-fidelity simulation scenarios. This study aims at investigating the psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience - Italian Version scale.

METHODS

A multi-centre cross-sectional study was conducted. The scale was administered to a sample of 266 undergraduate nursing students from two Italian universities after attending a medium- and high-fidelity simulation session in November 2022 and March 2023. Cronbach's alpha coefficient and item-total correlation were sorted out to assess internal consistency and reliability. The test-retest method was used as a measure of scale stability over time as well as the confirmatory factor analysis to verify construct validity.

RESULTS

The Cronbach's alpha value was 0.94 for the overall scale, indicating excellent reliability, and it was 0.84 or higher for each subscales, indicating good reliability. A large correlation coefficient of 0.60 or higher was found between each item and its subscale and between each item and the overall scale score. A medium test-retest correlation coefficient was found for most items (r > 0.30). The confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the factorial structure found in the original study.

CONCLUSIONS

Satisfaction is an important teaching and learning quality indicator along with the achievement of learning outcomes in simulation. The Satisfaction with Simulation Experience - Italian Version scale showed good reliability and validity; therefore, it could be a useful tool to assess simulation impact in Italian nursing students. The extensive utilization of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience scale, along with its various validated versions, could facilitate assessing satisfaction in simulation across diverse contexts and enable comparisons of findings across studies in different countries.

摘要

背景

模拟体验满意度量表是一个5点李克特量表,用于衡量学生在中高保真模拟场景中的满意度。本研究旨在调查模拟体验满意度量表意大利语版的心理测量特性。

方法

进行了一项多中心横断面研究。2022年11月和2023年3月,在两所意大利大学的266名本科护理专业学生参加中高保真模拟课程后,对他们使用了该量表。整理出克朗巴哈系数和项目与总分的相关性,以评估内部一致性和可靠性。采用重测法来衡量量表随时间的稳定性,并通过验证性因素分析来验证结构效度。

结果

总量表的克朗巴哈系数值为0.94,表明可靠性极佳,各子量表的克朗巴哈系数值为0.84或更高,表明可靠性良好。每个项目与其子量表之间以及每个项目与总量表得分之间的相关系数均大于或等于0.60。大多数项目的重测相关系数中等(r > 0.30)。验证性因素分析证实了原始研究中发现的因子结构。

结论

满意度是模拟教学中与学习成果达成情况同样重要的教学质量指标。模拟体验满意度量表意大利语版显示出良好的信效度;因此,它可能是评估意大利护理专业学生模拟效果的有用工具。模拟体验满意度量表及其各种经过验证的版本的广泛应用,有助于评估不同背景下模拟的满意度,并能够比较不同国家研究的结果。