• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

团队紧急评估测量量表在本科医学生和跨专业临床团队中的应用:智利应用的西班牙语版本的效度证据

Application of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure Scale in undergraduate medical students and interprofessional clinical teams: validity evidence of a Spanish version applied in Chile.

作者信息

Armijo-Rivera Soledad, Ferrada-Rivera Sandra, Aliaga-Toledo Marcela, Pérez Leonardo A

机构信息

Escuela de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.

Unidad de Calidad y Seguridad del Paciente, Hospital Padre Hurtado, Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Sep 13;10:1256982. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1256982. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2023.1256982
PMID:37771978
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10525305/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Teamwork is one of the competencies necessary for physicians to work effectively in health systems and is a competency that can be developed with simulation in professionals and medicine students. The Team Emergency Assessment Measurement (TEAM) was created to evaluate the non-technical performance of team members during resuscitation events in real teams. The TEAM scale includes items to assess leadership, teamwork, situational awareness, and task management. An objective evaluation tool in Spanish is valuable for training health professionals at all undergraduate and continuing education levels. This study aimed to generate evidence of the validity of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) in Spanish to measure the performance of medical students and adult, pediatric, and obstetric emergency clinical teams in simulated emergencies as a self-assessment tool.

METHODS

To develop the Spanish version of the instrument, a forward and backward translation process was followed by independent translators, native and fluent in English and Spanish, and a review by a panel of Chilean experts comprising three trained simulation instructors to verify semantics and cultural equivalence. High-fidelity simulations with debriefing were conducted with 5th-year medical students, in which students and instructors applied the Spanish version of the TEAM scale. In the second stage, adult, pediatric, and obstetric emergency management simulations were conducted using the TEAM scale for real clinical teams as a self-assessment tool.

FINDINGS

By applying the overall TEAM scale to medicine students and clinical teams, Cronbach's alpha was 0.921. For medical students' self-assessment, we obtained Cronbach's alpha of 0.869. No significant differences were found between the overall scores and the scores by dimensions evaluated by instructors and students ( > 0.05). In the case of clinical team training, Cronbach's alpha was 0.755 for adult emergency teams, 0.797 for pediatric emergency teams, and 0.853 for obstetric emergency teams.

CONCLUSION

The validated instrument is adequate for evaluating teamwork in medical student simulations by instructors and peers and for self-assessment in adult, pediatric, and obstetric emergency clinical teams.

摘要

背景

团队合作是医生在卫生系统中有效工作所需的能力之一,并且是一种可以通过针对专业人员和医学生的模拟训练来培养的能力。团队应急评估测量(TEAM)工具旨在评估实际团队在复苏事件中团队成员的非技术表现。TEAM量表包括评估领导力、团队合作、态势感知和任务管理的项目。一个西班牙语的客观评估工具对于各级本科和继续教育阶段的卫生专业人员培训具有重要价值。本研究旨在提供证据,证明西班牙语版的团队应急评估测量(TEAM)工具作为一种自我评估工具,在测量医学生以及成人、儿科和产科急诊临床团队在模拟紧急情况下的表现方面的有效性。

方法

为开发该工具的西班牙语版本,由精通英语和西班牙语的独立翻译人员进行了正向和反向翻译过程,并由一个由三名训练有素的模拟培训师组成的智利专家小组进行审核,以验证语义和文化等效性。对五年级医学生进行了带有汇报环节的高保真模拟,学生和培训师应用了西班牙语版的TEAM量表。在第二阶段,将TEAM量表作为自我评估工具,对成人、儿科和产科急诊管理模拟中的实际临床团队进行了测试。

结果

将整体TEAM量表应用于医学生和临床团队时,克朗巴赫α系数为0.921。对于医学生的自我评估,我们得到的克朗巴赫α系数为0.869。培训师和学生评估的总分与各维度得分之间未发现显著差异(>0.05)。在临床团队培训中,成人急诊团队的克朗巴赫α系数为0.755,儿科急诊团队为0.797,产科急诊团队为0.853。

结论

经验证的该工具适用于培训师和同伴对医学生模拟中的团队合作进行评估,以及适用于成人、儿科和产科急诊临床团队的自我评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/505c/10525305/f4abf1f5c624/fmed-10-1256982-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/505c/10525305/8c784f7ee2b0/fmed-10-1256982-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/505c/10525305/8eac7e497cab/fmed-10-1256982-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/505c/10525305/f4abf1f5c624/fmed-10-1256982-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/505c/10525305/8c784f7ee2b0/fmed-10-1256982-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/505c/10525305/8eac7e497cab/fmed-10-1256982-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/505c/10525305/f4abf1f5c624/fmed-10-1256982-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Application of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure Scale in undergraduate medical students and interprofessional clinical teams: validity evidence of a Spanish version applied in Chile.团队紧急评估测量量表在本科医学生和跨专业临床团队中的应用:智利应用的西班牙语版本的效度证据
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Sep 13;10:1256982. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1256982. eCollection 2023.
2
Conceptualizing Interprofessional Teams as Multi-Team Systems-Implications for Assessment and Training.将跨专业团队概念化为多团队系统——对评估和培训的启示
Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(4):366-9. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1077136.
3
The Teamwork Assessment Scale: A Novel Instrument to Assess Quality of Undergraduate Medical Students' Teamwork Using the Example of Simulation-based Ward-Rounds.团队合作评估量表:一种以基于模拟的病房查房为例评估本科医学生团队合作质量的新型工具。
GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2015 May 13;32(2):Doc19. doi: 10.3205/zma000961. eCollection 2015.
4
The TEAM instrument for measuring emergency team performance: validation of the Swedish version at two emergency departments.TEAM 工具用于测量应急团队绩效:在两个急诊科验证瑞典语版本。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Sep 20;29(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00952-9.
5
Improvement in student-led debriefing analysis after simulation-based team training using a revised teamwork assessment tool.使用经过修订的团队评估工具后,基于模拟的团队培训中学生主导的汇报分析得到改善。
Surgery. 2021 Dec;170(6):1659-1664. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.06.014. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
6
A Simulation-based Approach to Measuring Team Situational Awareness in Emergency Medicine: A Multicenter, Observational Study.基于模拟的急诊医学团队情境意识测量方法:一项多中心观察性研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Feb;25(2):196-204. doi: 10.1111/acem.13257. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
7
The PETRA (Perinatal Emergency Team Response Assessment) Scale: A High-Fidelity Simulation Validation Study.佩特拉(围产期应急团队反应评估)量表:一项高保真模拟验证研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017 Jul;39(7):523-533.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2016.12.036.
8
Measuring situation awareness and team effectiveness in pediatric acute care by using the situation global assessment technique.使用态势感知全局评估技术测量儿科急症护理中的态势感知和团队效能。
Eur J Pediatr. 2019 Jun;178(6):837-850. doi: 10.1007/s00431-019-03358-z. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
9
Leadership and teamwork in medical emergencies: performance of nursing students and registered nurses in simulated patient scenarios.医疗紧急情况中的领导力与团队合作:护理专业学生和注册护士在模拟患者场景中的表现
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Jan;24(1-2):90-100. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12611. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
10
Validating the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) in obstetric and gynaecologic resuscitation teams.验证产科和妇科复苏团队的团队应急评估工具(TEAM)。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Dec;61(6):855-861. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13362. Epub 2021 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Early introduction of simulation in the medical curriculum: the MedInTo perspective.医学课程中模拟教学的早期引入:MedInTo的观点。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jan 4;10:1280592. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1280592. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
The TEAM instrument for measuring emergency team performance: validation of the Swedish version at two emergency departments.TEAM 工具用于测量应急团队绩效:在两个急诊科验证瑞典语版本。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Sep 20;29(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00952-9.
2
Validating the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) in obstetric and gynaecologic resuscitation teams.验证产科和妇科复苏团队的团队应急评估工具(TEAM)。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Dec;61(6):855-861. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13362. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
3
The effect of team and leadership training of advanced life support providers on patient outcomes: A systematic review.
高级生命支持提供者的团队和领导力培训对患者结局的影响:系统评价。
Resuscitation. 2021 Mar;160:126-139. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.01.020. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
4
Best Practices and Theoretical Foundations for Simulation Instruction Using Rapid-Cycle Deliberate Practice.运用快速循环刻意练习进行模拟教学的最佳实践和理论基础。
Simul Healthc. 2020 Oct;15(5):356-362. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000433.
5
An observational study of ad-hoc anaesthesia teams.临时麻醉团队的观察性研究。
J Perioper Pract. 2020 Apr;30(4):102-106. doi: 10.1177/1750458919864837. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
6
Rating the quality of teamwork-a comparison of novice and expert ratings using the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) in simulated emergencies.团队协作质量评估——使用团队紧急评估量表(TEAM)在模拟紧急情况下对新手和专家评估结果的比较。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Feb 8;27(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0591-9.
7
Measuring the teamwork performance of teams in crisis situations: a systematic review of assessment tools and their measurement properties.测量危机情境下团队的团队协作表现:评估工具及其测量特性的系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Apr;28(4):327-337. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008260. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
8
2018 Consensus framework for good assessment.2018 年良好评估共识框架。
Med Teach. 2018 Nov;40(11):1102-1109. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1500016. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
9
Evaluation of TEAM dynamics before and after remote simulation training utilizing CERTAIN platform.利用 CERTAIN 平台评估远程模拟培训前后的 TEAM 动态。
Med Educ Online. 2018 Dec;23(1):1485431. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2018.1485431.
10
COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.COSMIN 患者报告结局测量系统评价偏倚风险清单。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1171-1179. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4. Epub 2017 Dec 19.