Spilsbury Francis, Kisielius Vaidotas, Bester Kai, Backhaus Thomas
Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg 40530, Sweden.
Department of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark.
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jan 1;906:167440. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167440. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
Reducing the risk posed by mixtures of pharmaceuticals is a goal of current initiatives such as the European Green Deal to reduce anthropological environmental impacts. Wastewater effluent typically contains large numbers of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs). For some APIs, existing technology such as conventional activated sludge (CAS) wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) have removal rates below 20 %, thus the WWTP discharges are adding to the toxic burden of receiving waters. We present an environmental risk assessment of mixtures of 35 APIs in effluent samples from 82 Northern European WWTPs using the concentration addition model, and identify the respective risk-driving APIs. This is then compared to a corresponding mixture risk assessment of effluent samples from the Danish Hillerød WWTP subjected to post-treatment with varying specific ozone doses (0.15-1.05 mgO/mgDOC) and/or granulated activated carbon (GAC). All 82 WWTP effluent samples exceeded risk thresholds by at least a factor of 30, with a median RQ of 92.9, highlighting the need for effluent post-treatment and/or a substantial dilution in the recipient waters. Antibiotics, analgesics and anti-depressants were among the top risk drivers with 99 % of the average mixture risk attributable to azithromycin, diclofenac, venlafaxine, clarithromycin and mycophenolic acid. Effluent mixture risk was reduced by ozonation in a concentration-dependent manner, decreasing below threshold levels to a median RQ of 0.83 following treatment with 0.65 mgO/mg DOC. Fresh GAC was also effective at reducing the mixture risk both alone and with ozone treatment, with median RQ of 0.04 and 0.07 respectively. To our knowledge, this is the first study to present a risk assessment of pharmaceutical mixtures in effluent comparing "conventional" WWTP processes with additional post-treatment with ozone and/or GAC for reducing the joint risks of pharmaceutical mixtures for recipient waters. We demonstrate the need for additional WWTP treatment technologies, and the efficacy of GAC and ozonation in decreasing the risk to the aquatic environment from pharmaceutical mixtures to below acceptable threshold limits.
降低药物混合物带来的风险是当前一些倡议(如欧洲绿色协议)的目标,这些倡议旨在减少人类活动对环境的影响。废水排放物通常含有大量活性药物成分(APIs)。对于某些活性药物成分,传统活性污泥(CAS)污水处理厂(WWTPs)等现有技术的去除率低于20%,因此污水处理厂的排放增加了受纳水体的毒性负担。我们使用浓度相加模型对来自82个北欧污水处理厂的出水样本中35种活性药物成分的混合物进行了环境风险评估,并确定了各自的风险驱动活性药物成分。然后将其与丹麦希勒勒德污水处理厂经过不同特定臭氧剂量(0.15 - 1.05 mgO/mgDOC)和/或颗粒活性炭(GAC)后处理的出水样本的相应混合物风险评估进行比较。所有82个污水处理厂的出水样本都超过了风险阈值至少30倍,中位数风险商(RQ)为92.9,这突出表明需要对出水进行后处理和/或在受纳水体中进行大幅稀释。抗生素、镇痛药和抗抑郁药是主要的风险驱动因素,平均混合物风险的99%归因于阿奇霉素、双氯芬酸、文拉法辛、克拉霉素和霉酚酸。臭氧处理以浓度依赖的方式降低了出水混合物风险,在用0.65 mgO/mg DOC处理后,风险降低到阈值水平以下,中位数风险商为0.83。新鲜的颗粒活性炭单独使用以及与臭氧处理结合使用时,也能有效降低混合物风险,中位数风险商分别为0.04和0.07。据我们所知,这是第一项对污水处理厂出水药物混合物进行风险评估的研究,该研究将“传统”污水处理工艺与臭氧和/或颗粒活性炭的额外后处理进行比较,以降低药物混合物对受纳水体的联合风险。我们证明了需要额外的污水处理技术,以及颗粒活性炭和臭氧处理在将药物混合物对水生环境的风险降低到可接受阈值以下方面的有效性。