Davey Charlie J E, van der Meer Tom V, Ter Laak Thomas L, Verdonschot Piet F M, Kraak Michiel H S
Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
Wageningen Environmental Research Wageningen UR P.O. Box 47 6700 AA Wageningen The Netherlands.
Environ Sci (Camb). 2025 May 9. doi: 10.1039/d5ew00011d.
Psychopharmaceuticals are an emerging group of hazardous contaminants that pose a risk to the aquatic environment. Yet, modern wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) do not remove them sufficiently to alleviate these risks. The present study aimed therefore to explore the effectiveness of an alternative nature-based tertiary treatment of WWTP effluent to remove psychopharmaceuticals. To this end, an algae-mussel trophic cascade setup was designed in which algae were grown in effluent over the course of 11 days and subsequently fed to mussels for a further 3 days. Removal of 30 psychopharmaceuticals for each of the treatments (algae, mussels, algae + mussels) was calculated relative to control samples, and removal efficiency was contextualised by performing an indicative risk assessment. Twelve psychopharmaceuticals were quantified during the experiment, with 11 encountered in all treatments. The compounds fell into 3 categories: positive removal (citalopram, lamotrigine, and venlafaxine), negative removal (carbamazepine, gabapentin, and pregabalin), and no significant changes in concentration (amitriptyline, quetiapine, tramadol, fluvoxamine, lidocaine, and ibuprofen). Both positive and negative removals were largely driven by the presence of the algae rather than that of the mussels. Compounds with a low p showed negative removal due to the algal growth induced rise in pH, which was not negated by the mussels at the end of the cascade. Ibuprofen was not removed by any treatment and was also the only compound that represented a substantial risk. The cumulative risks indicated that the algal-mussel cascade actually increased the risk due to the negative removal of compounds present in high concentrations such as carbamazepine. Pregabalin and gabapentin also increased in risk, but did, however, not significantly change the overall risk from the analysed compounds due to their low concentrations. Since the presently designed nature-based treatment could not negate risk, it is not suitable for the removal of psychopharmaceuticals.
精神药物是一类新兴的有害污染物,对水生环境构成风险。然而,现代污水处理厂(WWTPs)对它们的去除效果不足以减轻这些风险。因此,本研究旨在探索一种基于自然的污水处理厂出水三级处理方法去除精神药物的有效性。为此,设计了一种藻类-贻贝营养级联装置,其中藻类在出水中生长11天,随后再投喂给贻贝3天。计算每种处理(藻类、贻贝、藻类+贻贝)相对于对照样品对30种精神药物的去除率,并通过进行指示性风险评估来确定去除效率。实验过程中对12种精神药物进行了定量分析,所有处理中均检测到11种。这些化合物分为3类:正去除(西酞普兰、拉莫三嗪和文拉法辛)、负去除(卡马西平、加巴喷丁和普瑞巴林)以及浓度无显著变化(阿米替林、喹硫平、曲马多、氟伏沙明、利多卡因和布洛芬)。正去除和负去除主要是由藻类的存在而非贻贝驱动的。p值较低的化合物由于藻类生长导致pH值升高而出现负去除,在级联末端贻贝并未抵消这种影响。布洛芬未被任何处理去除,也是唯一一种具有重大风险的化合物。累积风险表明,由于对高浓度存在的化合物(如卡马西平)进行负去除,藻类-贻贝级联实际上增加了风险。普瑞巴林和加巴喷丁的风险也增加了,但由于其浓度较低,并未显著改变分析化合物的总体风险。由于目前设计的基于自然的处理方法无法消除风险,因此它不适用于去除精神药物。