• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤患者的地面与空中转运:医学及后勤方面的考量

Ground versus air transport of trauma victims: medical and logistical considerations.

作者信息

Burney R E, Fischer R P

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1986 Dec;15(12):1491-5. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(86)80950-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0196-0644(86)80950-7
PMID:3777623
Abstract

Emergency aeromedical transport for trauma victims varies widely, from 10% or less in some programs to more than 90% in others. There is the potential in all such programs for dramatic, lifesaving efforts as well as for costly and dangerous overuse. We propose the following preliminary guidelines for emergency aeromedical transport of trauma victims. Trauma scene flights should be dispatched only for seriously injured patients who are potentially salvageable. Trauma scene flights are not justified if the flight does not significantly reduce the interval between injury and patient arrival at an appropriate hospital (eg, from motor vehicle accident with entrapment) unless the flight delivers needed medical expertise or equipment to the scene. Critically injured patients should be returned to the closest hospital of appropriate capabilities and demonstrated expertise. Flight services should be a public service fully integrated into the metropolitan emergency medical services system. Scene flights should be dispatched within medical guidelines established by the regional emergency medical services system. Emergency aeromedical evacuation of trauma victims should assist the regionalization of trauma care to centers with special capabilities for the management of seriously injured patients. Promulgation of more detailed guidelines will depend on the accumulation of clinical experience and will be possible only if consistent efforts are made to obtain measures of injury severity, categories of injury, and long-term outcomes of management.

摘要

创伤患者的紧急航空医疗转运差异很大,在一些项目中占比10%或更低,而在另一些项目中则超过90%。所有此类项目都有可能做出巨大的、挽救生命的努力,也有可能出现代价高昂且危险的过度使用情况。我们提出以下关于创伤患者紧急航空医疗转运的初步指导原则。创伤现场飞行仅应派遣给有潜在挽救可能的重伤患者。如果飞行不能显著缩短受伤与患者抵达合适医院之间的间隔时间(例如,对于被困在机动车事故中的患者),除非飞行将所需的医疗专业知识或设备运送到现场,否则创伤现场飞行是不合理的。重伤患者应被送回具备相应能力且有专业经验证明的最近医院。飞行服务应作为一项公共服务,完全融入大都市紧急医疗服务系统。现场飞行应在区域紧急医疗服务系统制定的医疗指导原则内派遣。创伤患者的紧急航空医疗后送应有助于将创伤护理区域化到具备管理重伤患者特殊能力的中心。更详细指导原则的颁布将取决于临床经验的积累,并且只有在持续努力获取损伤严重程度、损伤类别以及管理的长期结果等衡量指标的情况下才有可能实现。

相似文献

1
Ground versus air transport of trauma victims: medical and logistical considerations.创伤患者的地面与空中转运:医学及后勤方面的考量
Ann Emerg Med. 1986 Dec;15(12):1491-5. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(86)80950-7.
2
Are scene flights for penetrating trauma justified?穿透性创伤的现场飞行是否合理?
J Trauma. 1997 Jul;43(1):83-6; discussion 86-8. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199707000-00019.
3
Characteristics of aeromedical transport, both interhospital and directly from the scene of the incident, in patients with acute myocardial infarction or acute trauma between 2011-2016 in Poland: A case-control study.2011-2016 年波兰急性心肌梗死或急性创伤患者的医联转运和现场直接转运的航空医疗转运特征:病例对照研究。
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2019 Nov;28(11):1495-1505. doi: 10.17219/acem/109456.
4
Maryland State Police Aviation Division. A model emergency medical system for our nation.马里兰州警方航空部门。我国的一个模范紧急医疗系统。
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2004;14(5):401-14. doi: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.v14.i5.60.
5
Urban helicopter response to the scene of injury.城市直升机对受伤现场的响应。
J Trauma. 1984 Nov;24(11):946-51. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198411000-00004.
6
Differences in mortality rates among trauma patients transported by helicopter and ambulance in Maryland.马里兰州直升机和救护车运送的创伤患者死亡率差异。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 1999 Jul-Sep;14(3):159-64.
7
A comparison of the association of helicopter and ground ambulance transport with the outcome of injury in trauma patients transported from the scene.直升机和地面救护车转运与从现场转运的创伤患者损伤结局之间关联的比较。
J Trauma. 1997 Dec;43(6):940-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199712000-00013.
8
Hospital Mortality Based on the Mode of Emergency Medical Services Transportation.基于紧急医疗服务运输方式的医院死亡率
Air Med J. 2017 Jul-Aug;36(4):188-192. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2017.03.003. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
9
Effect of aeromedical aircraft on care of trauma patients: evaluation using the Revised Trauma Score.
South Med J. 1992 Nov;85(11):1065-71. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199211000-00004.
10
A comparison of ground paramedics and aeromedical treatment of severe blunt trauma patients.
Conn Med. 1990 Dec;54(12):660-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Research priorities for administrative challenges of integrated networks of care.整合型医疗照护网络行政挑战的研究重点。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Dec;17(12):1330-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00934.x.
2
Clinical review: communication and logistics in the response to the 1998 terrorist bombing in Omagh, Northern Ireland.临床综述:北爱尔兰奥马1998年恐怖爆炸事件应对中的沟通与后勤保障
Crit Care. 2005 Aug;9(4):401-8. doi: 10.1186/cc3502. Epub 2005 Mar 23.
3
A trauma resource allocation model for ambulances and hospitals.一种针对救护车和医院的创伤资源分配模型。
Health Serv Res. 2000 Jun;35(2):489-507.
4
Impact of helicopters on trauma care and clinical results.直升机对创伤护理及临床结果的影响。
Ann Surg. 1988 Dec;208(6):673-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198812000-00001.