Institute of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Korytkova 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Int J Legal Med. 2024 Mar;138(2):395-400. doi: 10.1007/s00414-023-03099-7. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
Optimizing analysis parameters and sample input is crucial in forensic genetics methods to generate reliable results, and even more so when working with muti-copy mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and low-quality samples. This study compared mitotypes based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) results derived from the same samples at two different sequencing library concentrations-30 pM and 0.3 pM. Thirty femur samples from the Second World War were used as a model for poorly preserved DNA. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) method targeting 113 bp long fragment was employed to assess the quantity of mitogenomes. HID Ion Chef™ Instrument with Precision ID mtDNA Control Region Panel was used for library preparation and templating. Sequencing was performed with Ion GeneStudio™ S5 System. Reference haplotypes were determined from sequencing samples at 30 pM library input. Haplotypes were compared between optimal (30 pM) and suboptimal (0.3 pM) library inputs. Often the difference in haplotypes was length heteroplasmy, which in line with other studies shows that this type of variant is not reliable for interpretation in forensics. Excluding length variants at positions 573, 309, and 16,193, 56.7% of the samples matched, and in two samples, no sequence was obtained at suboptimal library input. The rest of the samples differed between optimal and suboptimal library input. To conclude, genotyping and analyzing low-quantity libraries derived from low-quality aged skeletonized human remains therefore must be done with caution in forensic genetics casework.
优化分析参数和样本输入对于法医遗传学方法至关重要,尤其是在处理多拷贝线粒体 DNA(mtDNA)和低质量样本时更是如此。本研究比较了基于下一代测序(NGS)结果的线粒体类型,这些结果来自两种不同测序文库浓度-30 pM 和 0.3 pM 的相同样本。使用二战时期的 30 个股骨样本作为保存不佳的 DNA 模型。使用针对 113 bp 长片段的定量 PCR(qPCR)方法评估线粒体基因组的数量。使用 HID Ion Chef™ Instrument 和 Precision ID mtDNA 控制区面板进行文库制备和模板化。使用 Ion GeneStudio™ S5 系统进行测序。在 30 pM 文库输入下从测序样本中确定参考单倍型。比较了最佳(30 pM)和次优(0.3 pM)文库输入之间的单倍型。通常,单倍型的差异是长度异质性,这与其他研究一致,表明这种类型的变体在法医学解释中不可靠。排除位置 573、309 和 16193 的长度变体,56.7%的样本匹配,在两个样本中,次优文库输入时没有获得序列。其余样本在最佳和次优文库输入之间存在差异。总之,必须谨慎对待从低质量老化骨骼人类遗骸中获得的低数量文库的基因分型和分析,因此在法医遗传学案件工作中必须谨慎进行。