Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Francie van Zijl Drive, Tygerberg, Cape Town 7505, South Africa.
The United States (US) Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), National Center for PTSD, Dissemination and Training Division, VA Palo Alto Health Care System; NCPTSD - 334; 795 Willow Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025, United States.
Psychiatry Res. 2023 Nov;329:115493. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115493. Epub 2023 Sep 24.
COVID-19 affected the well-being of healthcare workers (HCWs) globally. Mental health app interventions (MHAIs) may offer appropriate and accessible means to support HCWs' mental health. We conducted a pilot randomised controlled crossover trial involving 34 clinicians randomised to either a MHAI or a waitlisted group. After one month, outcome assessments were repeated and the waitlisted group then crossed over to the MHAI; they again completed outcome assessments after a month. The primary outcomes were feasibility, assessed with the Systems Usability Scale (SUS), and acceptability, assessed with the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ). Secondary outcomes included efficacy for various mental health parameters. The SUS and CSQ scores indicated above average feasibility and acceptability. There was a significant difference in anxiety from baseline to 1-month follow-up between the groups, with greater improvement in the MHAI group. The groups differed in resilience and patient-related burnout from baseline to 1-month follow-up, with a trend towards significance, with greater improvements in the MHAI group. Anxiety and acute stress disorder severity improved significantly from pre- to post-intervention. We demonstrated that MHAIs hold potential for improving well-being of HCWs, although these findings will need to be replicated in adequately powered trials.
COVID-19 对全球医护人员(HCWs)的健康产生了影响。心理健康应用干预(MHAIs)可能为支持 HCWs 的心理健康提供适当和可及的手段。我们进行了一项试点随机对照交叉试验,涉及 34 名临床医生,随机分为 MHAI 组或候补组。一个月后,重复进行结果评估,然后候补组交叉到 MHAI 组;一个月后,他们再次完成结果评估。主要结果是使用系统可用性量表(SUS)评估的可行性和使用客户满意度问卷(CSQ)评估的可接受性。次要结果包括各种心理健康参数的疗效。SUS 和 CSQ 评分表明具有较高的可行性和可接受性。两组在焦虑方面存在从基线到 1 个月随访的显著差异,MHAI 组的改善更为明显。两组在从基线到 1 个月随访的韧性和与患者相关的倦怠方面存在差异,具有显著趋势,MHAI 组的改善更为明显。焦虑和急性应激障碍严重程度在干预前后显著改善。我们证明了 MHAIs 有可能改善 HCWs 的幸福感,尽管这些发现需要在足够大的试验中得到复制。