A National Survey Exploring Practices and Perceptions of Sharing Experiential Evaluations With Future Preceptors.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to understand pharmacy programs' policies and processes of sharing Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience (APPE) assessment information among preceptors and to determine the types of grading scales currently being used nationally.

METHODS

A 14-question survey was utilized to collect information on Experiential Education policies and practices regarding APPE evaluations and assessment data sharing. The survey was administered electronically to Experiential Education Administrators at accredited schools of pharmacy nationally and gathered information on approach to APPE assessment, information sharing with future preceptors and open-ended responses on how struggling student learners are supported. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze quantitative responses, while qualitative open-ended comments were analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 95 responses were included in the analysis (67.9% response rate). The majority of programs (83.2%) reported not sharing student performance assessments with future preceptors. Themes that emerged from the analysis of open-ended comments included concerns about bias and privacy violations, and the benefits of sharing evaluations for preceptor preparation and longitudinal student growth. The grading approach varied, with 53.7% of programs using traditional tiered letter grades and 45.3% using a pass/fail grading system.

CONCLUSION

Most pharmacy programs do not share APPE assessment information with future preceptors due to concerns about bias and protecting student privacy. However, programs may be looking for alternative processes that address the need to facilitate student growth and to support struggling learners. Examples shared may provide stimulus and insight for Experiential Education Offices to engage in programmatic discussions about the approach to assessment sharing practices.